Literature DB >> 23303546

Bird song and anthropogenic noise: vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities.

Erwin Nemeth1, Nadia Pieretti, Sue Anne Zollinger, Nicole Geberzahn, Jesko Partecke, Ana Catarina Miranda, Henrik Brumm.   

Abstract

When animals live in cities, they have to adjust their behaviour and life histories to novel environments. Noise pollution puts a severe constraint on vocal communication by interfering with the detection of acoustic signals. Recent studies show that city birds sing higher-frequency songs than their conspecifics in non-urban habitats. This has been interpreted as an adaptation to counteract masking by traffic noise. However, this notion is debated, for the observed frequency shifts seem to be less efficient at mitigating noise than singing louder, and it has been suggested that city birds might use particularly high-frequency song elements because they can be produced at higher amplitudes. Here, we present the first phonetogram for a songbird, which shows that frequency and amplitude are strongly positively correlated in the common blackbird (Turdus merula), a successful urban colonizer. Moreover, city blackbirds preferentially sang higher-frequency elements that can be produced at higher intensities and, at the same time, happen to be less masked in low-frequency traffic noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23303546      PMCID: PMC3574330          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  33 in total

1.  Reverberation and frequency attenuation in forests--implications for acoustic communication in animals.

Authors:  Mark Padgham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Niels Bouton; Ilse van Opzeeland; Aukje Coers; Carel ten Cate; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Eira Bermúdez-Cuamatzin; Alejandro A Ríos-Chelén; Diego Gil; Constantino Macías Garcia
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Biomechanics and control of vocalization in a non-songbird.

Authors:  Coen P H Elemans; Riccardo Zaccarelli; Hanspeter Herzel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Sander Bot; Jasper Buikx; Marco van der Velde; Jan Komdeur; Carel ten Cate; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Testosterone implants alter the frequency range of zebra finch songs.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cynx; N Jay Bean; Ian Rossman
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.587

7.  Behavioral plasticity allows short-term adjustment to a novel environment.

Authors:  Karin Gross; Gilberto Pasinelli; Hansjoerg P Kunc
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  The Lombard effect.

Authors:  Sue Anne Zollinger; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins.

Authors:  Richard A Fuller; Philip H Warren; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Developmental stress affects song learning but not song complexity and vocal amplitude in zebra finches.

Authors:  Henrik Brumm; Sue Anne Zollinger; Peter J B Slater
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.980

View more
  24 in total

1.  Learning to cope with degraded sounds: female zebra finches can improve their expertise in discriminating between male voices at long distances.

Authors:  Solveig C Mouterde; Julie E Elie; Frédéric E Theunissen; Nicolas Mathevon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Direct and indirect effects of noise pollution alter biological communities in and near noise-exposed environments.

Authors:  Masayuki Senzaki; Taku Kadoya; Clinton D Francis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Vocal plasticity in a reptile.

Authors:  Henrik Brumm; Sue Anne Zollinger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Noise-Induced Frequency Modifications of Tamarin Vocalizations: Implications for Noise Compensation in Nonhuman Primates.

Authors:  Cara F Hotchkin; Susan E Parks; Daniel J Weiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Linking the sender to the receiver: vocal adjustments by bats to maintain signal detection in noise.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Holger R Goerlitz; Henrik Brumm; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Territorial black-capped chickadee males respond faster to high- than to low-frequency songs in experimentally elevated noise conditions.

Authors:  Stefanie E LaZerte; Hans Slabbekoorn; Ken A Otter
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Potential effects of anthropogenic noise on echolocation behavior in horseshoe bats.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage; Walter Metzner
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2013-05-10

8.  Sleepless in town--drivers of the temporal shift in dawn song in urban European blackbirds.

Authors:  Anja Nordt; Reinhard Klenke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predicting bird song from space.

Authors:  Thomas B Smith; Ryan J Harrigan; Alexander N G Kirschel; Wolfgang Buermann; Sassan Saatchi; Daniel T Blumstein; Selvino R de Kort; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  The Lombard effect in male ultrasonic frogs: Regulating antiphonal signal frequency and amplitude in noise.

Authors:  Jun-Xian Shen; Zhi-Min Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.