Literature DB >> 2329484

Comparison of A-scan device accuracy.

U Giers1, C Epple.   

Abstract

A-scan biometry is recognized as a useful aid in predicting intraocular lens power. Measurements are reported to be accurate to better than +/- 0.1 mm. Three biometry devices were compared in examinations of 159 persons, each examination being repeated several times. Axial length averaged 23.77 mm when measured by the immersion technique; applanation and modified applanation techniques yielded 0.1 mm and 0.3 mm shorter distances, respectively. Measured values of axial lengths did not have the same probability of being measured, even if they were close together. Results were not distributed in smooth Gaussian curves; on the contrary, clusters of values, on the pattern of our choice of ultrasound wavelength, were seen even when biometry was performed with electronic gates in the devices. Retest reliability decreased when short distances in the anterior segment of the eye were measured. Measurements of lens thickness were less readily reproducible in cataractous lenses than in healthy young eyes; anterior chamber depth, on the other hand, was measured more reliably in cataract patients. This last finding may have resulted in part from uncertainties about ultrasound velocity in the cataractous lens and in part from accommodation. In cataract patients, axial length was measured most reproducibly by the immersion technique; it was measured less accurately in young healthy eyes with a modified applanation device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2329484     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80737-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  12 in total

1.  IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  H Eleftheriadis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Axial length measurements by contact and immersion techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract.

Authors:  Rupal H Trivedi; M Edward Wilson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry.

Authors:  S Jasvinder; T F Khang; K K S Sarinder; V P Loo; V Subrayan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Lens thickness with age and accommodation by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kathryn Richdale; Mark A Bullimore; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Comparison of Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements from the Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer with IOLMaster.

Authors:  Roma P Patel; Rahul T Pandit
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Agreement between Orbscan II, VuMAX UBM and Artemis-2 very-high frequency ultrasound scanner for measurement of anterior chamber depth.

Authors:  Haya Matuoq Al Farhan
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 7.  Optical correction of aphakia in children.

Authors:  Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Ebrahim Shirzadeh; Medi Eslani; Mitra Akbari
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2014-01

8.  Accuracy of biometry for intraocular lens implantation using the new partial coherence interferometer, AL-scan.

Authors:  Sang Woo Moon; Sung Hyup Lim; Ho Young Lee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-19

9.  Influence of Biometric Variables on Refractive Outcomes after Cataract Surgery in Angle-closure Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Kyoung Nam Kim; Hyung Bin Lim; Jong Joo Lee; Chang-Sik Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-21

10.  Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner.

Authors:  Haya M Al-Farhan; Reem N Almutairi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.