PURPOSE: To use four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI to characterize and quantify 3D blood flow in the left atria (LA) of patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 4D flow MRI was acquired in 19 volunteers (n = 9<30 years, n = 10>50 years) and 10 patients with AF (62 ± 9.6 years; n = 4 in persistent AF, n = 6 postintervention). The LA in each dataset was segmented, and intra-atrial blood flow velocity was quantified. Flow coherence was measured as the consistency of the net blood flow vector. RESULTS: Quantification of atrial flow revealed significant differences in atrial hemodynamics between age groups. Postintervention AF patients had a mean blood flow of 0.22 ± 0.04 m/s, which was not significantly different than age-matched volunteers (0.21 ± 0.03 m/s). Patients with persistent AF had a mean blood flow of 0.13 ± 0.01 m/s, lower than AF patients in sinus rhythm (0.22 ± 0.04 m/s, P = 0.005), or age-matched volunteers (0.21 ± 0.03 m/s, P < 0.001). Flow coherence was significantly impaired in patients in AF. CONCLUSION: Flow-sensitive MRI shows that patients with a history of AF had global hemodynamics in the LA similar to those of age-matched volunteers. Additional studies with larger cohorts of AF patients and correlation with outcome are needed to further investigate the potential of atrial 4D flow MRI to flow patterns indicative of stroke risk in AF.
PURPOSE: To use four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI to characterize and quantify 3D blood flow in the left atria (LA) of patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 4D flow MRI was acquired in 19 volunteers (n = 9<30 years, n = 10>50 years) and 10 patients with AF (62 ± 9.6 years; n = 4 in persistent AF, n = 6 postintervention). The LA in each dataset was segmented, and intra-atrial blood flow velocity was quantified. Flow coherence was measured as the consistency of the net blood flow vector. RESULTS: Quantification of atrial flow revealed significant differences in atrial hemodynamics between age groups. Postintervention AFpatients had a mean blood flow of 0.22 ± 0.04 m/s, which was not significantly different than age-matched volunteers (0.21 ± 0.03 m/s). Patients with persistent AF had a mean blood flow of 0.13 ± 0.01 m/s, lower than AFpatients in sinus rhythm (0.22 ± 0.04 m/s, P = 0.005), or age-matched volunteers (0.21 ± 0.03 m/s, P < 0.001). Flow coherence was significantly impaired in patients in AF. CONCLUSION: Flow-sensitive MRI shows that patients with a history of AF had global hemodynamics in the LA similar to those of age-matched volunteers. Additional studies with larger cohorts of AFpatients and correlation with outcome are needed to further investigate the potential of atrial 4D flow MRI to flow patterns indicative of stroke risk in AF.
Authors: Emilie Bollache; Pim van Ooij; Alex Powell; James Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Michael Markl; Jacob Fluckiger; Daniel C Lee; Jason Ng; Jeffrey J Goldberger Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Julio Garcia; Alex J Barker; Pim van Ooij; Susanne Schnell; Jyothy Puthumana; Robert O Bonow; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Julio Garcia; Roel L F van der Palen; Emilie Bollache; Kelly Jarvis; Michael J Rose; Alex J Barker; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Joshua Robinson; Cynthia K Rigsby; Michael Markl Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Daniel C Lee; Michael Markl; Jason Ng; Maria Carr; Brandon Benefield; James C Carr; Jeffrey J Goldberger Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Jeffrey J Goldberger; Rishi Arora; David Green; Philip Greenland; Daniel C Lee; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Michael Markl; Jason Ng; Sanjiv J Shah Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Michael Markl; Daniel C Lee; Nicholas Furiasse; Maria Carr; Charles Foucar; Jason Ng; James Carr; Jeffrey J Goldberger Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: M Markl; S Schnell; C Wu; E Bollache; K Jarvis; A J Barker; J D Robinson; C K Rigsby Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 2.350