Literature DB >> 25978593

Velocity quantification by electrocardiography-gated phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac arrhythmia: a simulation study based on real time transesophageal echocardiography data in atrial fibrillation.

Michael Markl1, Jacob Fluckiger, Daniel C Lee, Jason Ng, Jeffrey J Goldberger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically investigate the impact of beat-to-beat variations on electrocardiography (ECG)-gated multibeat flow imaging with phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on real time in vivo transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) data in patients with known arrhythmia.
METHODS: Real-time 2-dimensional Doppler TEE was performed in five patients with atrial fibrillation (4 men, age = 64 ± 8.7 years). The TEE data provided real-time left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) flow velocities in consecutive cardiac cycles with different RR interval durations. The PC MRI acquisitions were simulated from the TEE velocity measures by constructing time-resolved k-space data for segmented sampling schemes typically used for ECG-gated 2-dimensional PC MRI. Each simulation was repeated 100 times to minimize effects from data that may be weighted to a particular beat in the center of k-space. The resulting LA and LV velocities were compared to the average TEE velocities and data from individual cardiac cycles.
RESULTS: Despite beat-to-beat variations of velocities in TEE data, ECG-gated flow imaging with MRI could reproduce persistent average LA and LV mean velocities within 7.0% to 7.4% compared to TEE.
CONCLUSIONS: The PC MRI velocity measurements in patients with varying RR interval durations are not significantly different from time-averaged real-time velocity data for a typical segmented k-space data acquisition schemes. Though beat-to-beat variations in atrial velocities that were observed with TEE cannot be detected with ECG-gated multibeat PC MRI, it can reliably assess average flow patterns across multiple beats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25978593      PMCID: PMC4435847          DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  20 in total

Review 1.  The future of real-time cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Krishna S Nayak; Bob S Hu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  How we perform cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow assessment using phase-contrast velocity mapping.

Authors:  Ping Chai; Raad Mohiaddin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 3.  Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI.

Authors:  Peter D Gatehouse; Jennifer Keegan; Lindsey A Crowe; Sharmeen Masood; Raad H Mohiaddin; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; David N Firmin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  MR blood flow measurement. Clinical application in the heart and circulation.

Authors:  R H Mohiaddin; D J Pennell
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.213

5.  Pathophysiologic correlates of thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: I. Reduced flow velocity in the left atrial appendage (The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation [SPAF-III] study).

Authors:  M E Goldman; L A Pearce; R G Hart; M Zabalgoitia; R W Asinger; R Safford; J L Halperin
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Left atrial flow velocity distribution and flow coherence using four-dimensional FLOW MRI: a pilot study investigating the impact of age and Pre- and Postintervention atrial fibrillation on atrial hemodynamics.

Authors:  Jacob U Fluckiger; Jeffrey J Goldberger; Daniel C Lee; Jason Ng; Richard Lee; Amita Goyal; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Patients with atrial fibrillation and dense spontaneous echo contrast at high risk a prospective and serial follow-up over 12 months with transesophageal echocardiography and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter Bernhardt; Harald Schmidt; Christoph Hammerstingl; Berndt Lüderitz; Heyder Omran
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Transesophageal echocardiographic correlates of thromboembolism in high-risk patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators Committee on Echocardiography.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo.

Authors:  D Fatkin; R P Kelly; M P Feneley
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Analysis and implications.

Authors:  W M Feinberg; J L Blackshear; A Laupacis; R Kronmal; R G Hart
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-03-13
View more
  4 in total

1.  Left Atrial 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Stasis and Velocity Mapping in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Daniel C Lee; Jason Ng; Maria Carr; James Carr; Jeffrey J Goldberger
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 2.  Evaluating the Atrial Myopathy Underlying Atrial Fibrillation: Identifying the Arrhythmogenic and Thrombogenic Substrate.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Goldberger; Rishi Arora; David Green; Philip Greenland; Daniel C Lee; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Michael Markl; Jason Ng; Sanjiv J Shah
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Left Atrial and Left Atrial Appendage 4D Blood Flow Dynamics in Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Daniel C Lee; Nicholas Furiasse; Maria Carr; Charles Foucar; Jason Ng; James Carr; Jeffrey J Goldberger
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Assessment of left and right atrial 3D hemodynamics in patients with atrial fibrillation: a 4D flow MRI study.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Maria Carr; Jason Ng; Daniel C Lee; Kelly Jarvis; James Carr; Jeffrey J Goldberger
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.357

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.