Debra Sprague1, Joan Russo, Donna L LaVallie, Dedra Buchwald. 1. Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research and Partnerships for Native Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. dedra@u.washington.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: American Indians and Alaska Natives (AIs/ANs) have some of the highest cancer-related mortality rates of all US racial and ethnic groups, but they are underrepresented in clinical trials. We sought to identify factors that influence willingness to participate in cancer clinical trials among AI/AN tribal college students, and to compare attitudes toward clinical trial participation among these students with attitudes among older AI/AN adults. METHODS: Questionnaire data from 489 AI/AN tribal college students were collected and analyzed along with previously collected data from 112 older AI/AN adults. We examined 10 factors that influenced participation in the tribal college sample, and using chi-square analysis and these 10 factors, we compared attitudes toward research participation among 3 groups defined by age: students younger than 40, students 40 and older, and nonstudent adults 40 and older. FINDINGS: About 80% of students were willing to participate if the study would lead to new treatments or help others with cancer in their community, the study doctor had experience treating AI/AN patients, and they received payment. Older nonstudent adults were less likely to participate on the basis of the doctor's expertise than were students (73% vs 84%, P = .007), or if the study was conducted 50 miles away (24% vs 41%, P= .001). CONCLUSIONS: Finding high rates of willingness to participate is an important first step in increasing participation of AIs/ANs in clinical trials. More information is needed on whether these attitudes influence actual behavior when opportunities to participate become available.
PURPOSE: American Indians and Alaska Natives (AIs/ANs) have some of the highest cancer-related mortality rates of all US racial and ethnic groups, but they are underrepresented in clinical trials. We sought to identify factors that influence willingness to participate in cancer clinical trials among AI/AN tribal college students, and to compare attitudes toward clinical trial participation among these students with attitudes among older AI/AN adults. METHODS: Questionnaire data from 489 AI/AN tribal college students were collected and analyzed along with previously collected data from 112 older AI/AN adults. We examined 10 factors that influenced participation in the tribal college sample, and using chi-square analysis and these 10 factors, we compared attitudes toward research participation among 3 groups defined by age: students younger than 40, students 40 and older, and nonstudent adults 40 and older. FINDINGS: About 80% of students were willing to participate if the study would lead to new treatments or help others with cancer in their community, the study doctor had experience treating AI/AN patients, and they received payment. Older nonstudent adults were less likely to participate on the basis of the doctor's expertise than were students (73% vs 84%, P = .007), or if the study was conducted 50 miles away (24% vs 41%, P= .001). CONCLUSIONS: Finding high rates of willingness to participate is an important first step in increasing participation of AIs/ANs in clinical trials. More information is needed on whether these attitudes influence actual behavior when opportunities to participate become available.
Authors: Daniel G Petereit; Deborah Rogers; Frank Govern; Norman Coleman; Christen H Osburn; Steve P Howard; Judith Kaur; Linda Burhansstipanov; C Jack F Fowler; Richard Chappell; Minesh P Mehta Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-11-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jean G Ford; Mollie W Howerton; Gabriel Y Lai; Tiffany L Gary; Shari Bolen; M Chris Gibbons; Jon Tilburt; Charles Baffi; Teerath Peter Tanpitukpongse; Renee F Wilson; Neil R Powe; Eric B Bass Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kathleen Thiede Call; Donna D McAlpine; Pamela Jo Johnson; Timothy J Beebe; James A McRae; Yunjie Song Journal: Med Care Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Daniel G Petereit; Petra Helbig; David Koop; Patricia Kussman; Emily Fox Dunn; Asha Patnaik Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2009-11-23 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: John H Stewart; Alain G Bertoni; Jennifer L Staten; Edward A Levine; Cary P Gross Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-08-08 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: David K Espey; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Judith Swan; Charles Wiggins; Melissa A Jim; Elizabeth Ward; Phyllis A Wingo; Holly L Howe; Lynn A G Ries; Barry A Miller; Ahmedin Jemal; Faruque Ahmed; Nathaniel Cobb; Judith S Kaur; Brenda K Edwards Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kassandra I Alcaraz; Jamilia Sly; Kimlin Ashing; Linda Fleisher; Virginia Gil-Rivas; Sabrina Ford; Jean C Yi; Qian Lu; Cathy D Meade; Usha Menon; Clement K Gwede Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2016-08-10
Authors: Skyler J Bordeaux; Anthony W Baca; Rene L Begay; Francine C Gachupin; J Gregory Caporaso; Melissa M Herbst-Kralovetz; Naomi R Lee Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2021-09-24 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Jennifer A H Bell; Victoria Forcina; Laura Mitchell; Seline Tam; Kate Wang; Abha A Gupta; Jeremy Lewin Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 4.430