Literature DB >> 16808751

Attitudes of urban American Indians and Alaska Natives regarding participation in research.

Dedra Buchwald1, Veronica Mendoza-Jenkins, Calvin Croy, Helen McGough, Marjorie Bezdek, Paul Spicer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine what factors influence participation in health research among American Indians and Alaska Natives.
METHODS: Using vignettes that described 3 types of research studies (a behavioral intervention trial, a genetic association study, and a pharmacotherapy trial), we surveyed 319 patients and 101 staff from an urban Indian health care facility to ascertain how study design, institutional sponsorship, community involvement, human subjects' issues, and subject matter influence participation.
RESULTS: Overall response rates were 93% for patients and 75% for staff. Hypothetical participation was highest for the genetic study (patients=64%; staff=48%), followed by the behavioral intervention (patients=46%; staff=42%), and the pharmacotherapy trial (patients=32%; staff=23%). The odds of participation (odds ratio [OR]) were generally increased among patients and staff when the study was conducted by health care providers (OR=1.3 to 2.9) and addressed serious health problems (OR=1.2 to 7.2), but were decreased if the federal government led the study (OR=0.3 to 0.5), confidentiality might be broken (OR=0.1 to 0.3), and compensation was not provided (OR=0.5 to 0.7).
CONCLUSION: Close attention to study type, institutional sponsorship, community involvement, potential risks and benefits, and topic are essential to conceptualizing, designing, and implementing successful health research with American Indian and Alaska Native populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16808751      PMCID: PMC1924613          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00449.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  30 in total

1.  Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration.

Authors:  R M Groves; E Singer; A Corning
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  Recruitment and retention of minority women in cancer screening, prevention, and treatment trials.

Authors:  D R Brown; M N Fouad; K Basen-Engquist; G Tortolero-Luna
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 3.  Recruitment and retention of latino dementia family caregivers in intervention research: issues to face, lessons to learn.

Authors:  Dolores Gallagher-Thompson; Nancy Solano; David Coon; Patricia Areán
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2003-02

4.  Recruitment and baseline characteristics of participants in the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension trial. DASH Collaborative Research Group.

Authors:  L J Appel; W M Vollmer; E Obarzanek; K M Aicher; P R Conlin; B M Kennedy; J B Charleston; P M Reams
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1999-08

5.  History of medical ethics and perspectives on disparities in minority recruitment and involvement in health research.

Authors:  B Seto
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.378

6.  Recruitment of older African Americans for survey research: a process evaluation of the community and church-based strategy in The Durham Elders Project.

Authors:  Peter S Reed; Kristie Long Foley; John Hatch; Elizabeth J Mutran
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2003-02

Review 7.  Recruiting minorities into clinical trials: toward a participant-friendly system.

Authors:  G M Swanson; A J Ward
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-12-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Increasing ethnic minority participation in Alzheimer disease research.

Authors:  Jason T Olin; Karen S Dagerman; Lauren S Fox; Beth Bowers; Lon S Schneider
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.703

9.  Recruitment strategies in the women's health trial: feasibility study in minority populations. WHT:FSMP Investigators Group. Women's Health Trial:Feasibility Study in Minority Populations.

Authors:  C E Lewis; V George; M Fouad; V Porter; D Bowen; N Urban
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1998-10

10.  Bridging the gap: recruitment of African-American women into mental health research studies.

Authors:  Judith A Meinert; Mary C Blehar; Kathleen S Peindl; Angela Neal-Barnett; Katherine L Wisner
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  2003
View more
  35 in total

1.  Considerations in the construction of an instrument to assess attitudes regarding critical illness gene variation research.

Authors:  Bradley D Freeman; Carie R Kennedy; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Alexander Eastman; Ellen Iverson; Erica Shehane; Aaron Celious; Jennifer Barillas; Brian Clarridge
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 2.  Public willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rene Sterling; Gail E Henderson; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership.

Authors:  Suzanne Christopher; Vanessa Watts; Alma Knows His Gun McCormick; Sara Young
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Promoting wellness in Alaskan villages: integrating traditional knowledge and science of wild berries.

Authors:  Courtney G Flint; Ewan S Robinson; Joshua Kellogg; Gary Ferguson; Lama Boufajreldin; Mallory Dolan; Ilya Raskin; Mary Ann Lila
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.184

5.  Promoting ethical research with American Indian and Alaska Native people living in urban areas.

Authors:  Nicole P Yuan; Jami Bartgis; Deirdre Demers
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Perceptions regarding genetic testing in populations at risk for nephropathy.

Authors:  Barry I Freedman; Alison J Fletcher; Vivek R Sanghani; Mitzie Spainhour; Angelina W Graham; Gregory B Russell; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Ana S Iltis; Nancy M P King
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.754

7.  Perspectives on communication and engagement with regard to collecting biospecimens and family health histories for cancer research in a rural Alaska Native community.

Authors:  Lisa G Dirks; Jennifer L Shaw; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Julie A Beans; Janet J Kelly; Denise A Dillard
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-01-30

8.  What leads Indians to participate in clinical trials? A meta-analysis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Jatin Y Shah; Amruta Phadtare; Dimple Rajgor; Meenakshi Vaghasia; Shreyasee Pradhan; Hilary Zelko; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Barriers to cancer clinical trial participation among American Indian and Alaska Native tribal college students.

Authors:  Debra Sprague; Joan Russo; Donna L LaVallie; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.