Literature DB >> 23288659

Individual differences in the gesture effect on working memory.

Lars Marstaller1, Hana Burianová.   

Abstract

Co-speech gestures have been shown to interact with working memory (WM). However, no study has investigated whether there are individual differences in the effect of gestures on WM. Combining a novel gesture/no-gesture task and an operation span task, we examined the differences in WM accuracy between individuals who gestured and individuals who did not gesture in relation to their WM capacity. Our results showed individual differences in the gesture effect on WM. Specifically, only individuals with low WM capacity showed a reduced WM accuracy when they did not gesture. Individuals with low WM capacity who did gesture, as well as high-capacity individuals (irrespective of whether they gestured or not), did not show the effect. Our findings show that the interaction between co-speech gestures and WM is affected by an individual's WM load.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23288659     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0365-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  23 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: individual differences in voluntary saccade control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Josef C Schrock; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Interactions between working memory, attention and eye movements.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Artem Belopolsky; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-02-23

Review 5.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

6.  Visible embodiment: gestures as simulated action.

Authors:  Autumn B Hostetter; Martha W Alibali
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

7.  Working memory capacity and go/no-go task performance: selective effects of updating, maintenance, and inhibition.

Authors:  Thomas S Redick; Alejandra Calvo; Catherine E Gay; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Influence of response prepotency strength, general working memory resources, and specific working memory load on the ability to inhibit predominant responses: a comparison of young and elderly participants.

Authors:  Julien Grandjean; Fabienne Collette
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking about nonpresent objects.

Authors:  Raedy Ping; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-05

10.  Gestures, but not meaningless movements, lighten working memory load when explaining math.

Authors:  Susan Wagner Cook; Terina Kuang Yi Yip; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-05-01
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Gesture as simulated action: Revisiting the framework.

Authors:  Autumn B Hostetter; Martha W Alibali
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

2.  Gesturing during mental problem solving reduces eye movements, especially for individuals with lower visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Wim T J L Pouw; Myrto-Foteini Mavilidi; Tamara van Gog; Fred Paas
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-03-19

3.  A speaker's gesture style can affect language comprehension: ERP evidence from gesture-speech integration.

Authors:  Christian Obermeier; Spencer D Kelly; Thomas C Gunter
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Verbal working memory predicts co-speech gesture: evidence from individual differences.

Authors:  Maureen Gillespie; Ariel N James; Kara D Federmeier; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-05-08

5.  Contrast Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Infelicitous Beat Gesture Increases Cognitive Load During Online Spoken Discourse Comprehension.

Authors:  Laura M Morett; Jennifer M Roche; Scott H Fraundorf; James C McPartland
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-10

6.  Inconsistent use of gesture space during abstract pointing impairs language comprehension.

Authors:  Thomas C Gunter; J E Douglas Weinbrenner; Henning Holle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-09

7.  Toward a more embedded/extended perspective on the cognitive function of gestures.

Authors:  Wim T J L Pouw; Jacqueline A de Nooijer; Tamara van Gog; Rolf A Zwaan; Fred Paas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-24

8.  High gamma oscillations in medial temporal lobe during overt production of speech and gestures.

Authors:  Lars Marstaller; Hana Burianová; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Links between Gestures and Multisensory Processing: Individual Differences Suggest a Compensation Mechanism.

Authors:  Simon B Schmalenbach; Jutta Billino; Tilo Kircher; Bianca M van Kemenade; Benjamin Straube
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-16

Review 10.  Working Memory for Linguistic and Non-linguistic Manual Gestures: Evidence, Theory, and Application.

Authors:  Mary Rudner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.