Literature DB >> 21885178

Influence of response prepotency strength, general working memory resources, and specific working memory load on the ability to inhibit predominant responses: a comparison of young and elderly participants.

Julien Grandjean1, Fabienne Collette.   

Abstract

One conception of inhibitory functioning suggests that the ability to successfully inhibit a predominant response depends mainly on the strength of that response, the general functioning of working memory processes, and the working memory demand of the task (Roberts, Hager, & Heron, 1994). The proposal that inhibition and functional working memory capacity interact was assessed in the present study using two motor inhibition tasks (Go/No-Go and response incompatibility) in young and older participants. The strength of prepotency was assessed with a short or long training phase for the response to be inhibited. The influence of working memory resources was evaluated by administering the tasks in full vs. divided attention conditions. The effect of working memory load was manipulated by increasing the number of target and distracter items in each task. Results showed no effect of prepotency strength, whereas dividing attentional resources and increasing working memory load were associated with greater inhibitory effects in both groups and for both tasks. This deleterious effect was higher for older participants, except in the working memory load condition of the Go/No-Go task. These results suggest an interactive link between working memory and response inhibition by showing that taxing working memory resources increases the difficulty of inhibiting prepotent responses in younger and older subjects. The additional detrimental effect of these factors on healthy elderly subjects was related to their decreased cognitive resources and to their shorter span size.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21885178     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  9 in total

1.  Individual differences in the gesture effect on working memory.

Authors:  Lars Marstaller; Hana Burianová
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

2.  Age-related changes in post-movement beta synchronization during a selective inhibition task.

Authors:  Etienne Sallard; Jessica Tallet; Gregor Thut; Marie-Pierre Deiber; Jérôme Barral
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Aging and response conflict solution: behavioural and functional connectivity changes.

Authors:  Robert Langner; Edna C Cieslik; Simone D Behrwind; Christian Roski; Svenja Caspers; Katrin Amunts; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Intentional and Reactive Inhibition During Spoken-Word Stroop Task Performance in People With Aphasia.

Authors:  Rebecca Hunting Pompon; Malcolm R McNeil; Kristie A Spencer; Diane L Kendall
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Exploring the factor structure of neurocognitive measures in older individuals.

Authors:  Nadine Correia Santos; Patrício Soares Costa; Liliana Amorim; Pedro Silva Moreira; Pedro Cunha; Jorge Cotter; Nuno Sousa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Foundations of cumulative culture in apes: improved foraging efficiency through relinquishing and combining witnessed behaviours in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Sarah J Davis; Gillian L Vale; Steven J Schapiro; Susan P Lambeth; Andrew Whiten
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Verbal Working Memory but Not Attention Is Related to Language Proficiency: Evidence from Multilingual Speakers.

Authors:  Marion Bouffier; Cristina Barbu; Steve Majerus
Journal:  Psychol Belg       Date:  2020-09-04

Review 8.  Age differences in sustained attention tasks: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonino Vallesi; Virginia Tronelli; Francesco Lomi; Rachele Pezzetta
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-26

Review 9.  Inhibitory Control in Aging: The Compensation-Related Utilization of Neural Circuits Hypothesis.

Authors:  Weixi Kang; Junxin Wang; Antonio Malvaso
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 5.702

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.