Literature DB >> 21299326

Working memory capacity and go/no-go task performance: selective effects of updating, maintenance, and inhibition.

Thomas S Redick1, Alejandra Calvo, Catherine E Gay, Randall W Engle.   

Abstract

The ability to temporarily maintain information in order to successfully perform a task is important in many daily activities. However, the ability to quickly and accurately update existing mental representations in distracting situations is also imperative in many of these same circumstances. In the current studies, individuals varying in working memory capacity (WMC) performed different varieties of go/no-go tasks that have been hypothesized to measure inhibitory ability. The results indicated that low-WMC individuals relative to high-WMC individuals showed worse performance specifically in certain conditions of the conditional go/no-go task. Further analyses showed that increasing the temporal lag/number of intervening items between the previous target and the current lure had a deleterious effect on the performance of the low-WMC group only. The results indicate a relationship between WMC and the ability to selectively update, maintain, and retrieve information, especially in interference-rich conditions. 2011 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21299326     DOI: 10.1037/a0022216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  24 in total

1.  Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Complex span and n-back measures of working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas S Redick; Dakota R B Lindsey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

Review 3.  A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

4.  Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2019-03-29

5.  Individual differences in the gesture effect on working memory.

Authors:  Lars Marstaller; Hana Burianová
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

6.  Working memory capacity and intra-individual variability of proactive control.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2017-11-08

7.  A framework for executive function in the late elementary years.

Authors:  Paul T Cirino; Yusra Ahmed; Jeremy Miciak; W Pat Taylor; Elyssa H Gerst; Marcia A Barnes
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Beyond individual differences: are working memory and inhibition informative specifiers within ASD?

Authors:  Marieke de Vries; Hilde M Geurts
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict.

Authors:  Matt E Meier; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Remembering to prepare: The benefits (and costs) of high working memory capacity.

Authors:  Lauren L Richmond; Thomas S Redick; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.