Literature DB >> 23288047

Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a comparison of opening and closing wedge osteotomy.

Ricardo Bastos Filho1, Robert A Magnussen, Victoria Duthon, Guillaume Demey, Elvire Servien, José Mauro Granjeiro, Philippe Neyret.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is frequently used to treat varus osteoarthritis in younger patients with the goal of delaying the need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While it has been reported that the results of TKA following HTO are worse than those in patients without prior knee surgery, the influence of osteotomy technique (medial opening-wedge versus lateral closing-wedge) has not been explored. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of HTO technique on the performance and results of TKA.
METHODS: A total of 141 TKA's performed in 118 patients with prior HTO (24 opening wedge and 117 closing wedge) were reviewed at a mean follow-up of two years. Reviewed data included intra-operative factors (tourniquet time, the need for additional exposure, and intra-operative complications), clinical results (International Knee Score (IKS)) and radiographic assessment of limb alignment.
RESULTS: The average IKS knee and function scores improved from 54.0 and 60.3 to 87.0 and 79.5 (p <  0.0001). There was no significant difference in IKS scores based on osteotomy technique. There was a trend toward an increased need for tibial tubercle osteotomy in the closing wedge group. There was an increased need for extensive medial release in the opening wedge group and extensive lateral release in the closing wedge group. No differences in tourniquet time, complication rates, or hip-knee-ankle angle were noted between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic limb alignment, patient-reported outcomes, and complication rates are equal in patients undergoing TKA after opening and closing wedge HTO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23288047      PMCID: PMC3580093          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1765-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  Long term evaluation of high tibial valgus osteotomy.

Authors:  J R Valenti; R Calvo; R Lopez; J Cañadell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Results of proximal tibial osteotomy. The effects of tibiofemoral angle, stance-phase flexion-extension, and medial-plateau force.

Authors:  D B Kettelkamp; D R Wenger; E Y Chao; C Thompson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Proximal tibial osteotomy. Factors that influence the duration of satisfactory function.

Authors:  L S Matthews; S A Goldstein; T A Malvitz; B P Katz; H Kaufer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  High tibial osteotomy for medial osteoarthritis of the knee. A 5 to 7 and 11 year follow-up.

Authors:  I Ivarsson; R Myrnerts; J Gillquist
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-03

6.  The total condylar knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis. A five to nine-year follow-up of the first one hundred consecutive replacements.

Authors:  J N Insall; R W Hood; L B Flawn; D J Sullivan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. A five to ten-year follow-up study.

Authors:  S Vainionpää; E Läike; P Kirves; P Tiusanen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis. A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  J N Insall; D M Joseph; C Msika
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Total knee arthroplasty following proximal tibial osteotomy: risk factors for failure.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Arlen D Hanssen; Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Patella baja after the modified Coventry-Maquet high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  David Backstein; Borna Meisami; Allan E Gross
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.757

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review of open versus closed wedge osteotomy.

Authors:  Jae Hwi Han; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Nikhl N Bhandare; Dong Won Suh; Jong Seong Lee; Yong Suk Chang; Ji Woong Yeom; Kyung Wook Nha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The effect of high tibial osteotomy on the posterior tibial slope.

Authors:  Serban Dragosloveanu; Stefan Cristea; Calin Dragosloveanu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2014-06

3.  High tibial osteotomy in varus knees: indications and limits.

Authors:  Marco Corgiat Loia; Stefania Vanni; Federica Rosso; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Matteo Bruzzone; Federico Dettoni; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-08-18

4.  Intra-articular injections of expanded mesenchymal stem cells with and without addition of platelet-rich plasma are safe and effective for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ricardo Bastos; Marcelo Mathias; Renato Andrade; Raquel Bastos; Alex Balduino; Vinicius Schott; Scott Rodeo; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Xavier Paredes-Carnero; Manuel Leyes; Francisco Forriol; Ana Belén Fernández-Cortiñas; Jesús Escobar; Javier G Babé
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis (UKOA): Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) or High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO)?

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-10

7.  Comparison of the impact of closing wedge versus opening wedge high tibial osteotomy on proximal tibial deformity and subsequent revision to total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Umito Kuwashima; Yasutaka Tashiro; Ken Okazaki; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Satoshi Hamai; Koji Murakami; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Computer-assisted total knee replacement after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: medium-term results in a series of ninety cases.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Julie Massfelder; Ramsay Refaie; Brice Rubens-Duval; Roch Mader; René Christopher Rouchy; Régis Pailhé
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Medial open wedge vs. lateral closed wedge high tibial osteotomy - Indications based on the findings of patellar height, leg length, torsional correction and clinical outcome in one hundred cases.

Authors:  Felix Ferner; Christoph Lutter; Joerg Dickschas; Wolf Strecker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Cruciate retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after previous high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Ngai Nung Lo; Hwei Chi Chong; Hee Nee Pang; Darren Keng Jin Tay; Pak Lin Chin; Shi-Lu Chia; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.