Literature DB >> 977627

Results of proximal tibial osteotomy. The effects of tibiofemoral angle, stance-phase flexion-extension, and medial-plateau force.

D B Kettelkamp, D R Wenger, E Y Chao, C Thompson.   

Abstract

Forty-eight knees were evaluated after proximal tibial osteotomy, performed for varus deformity to determine the desired amount of correction of the deformity, the effect of osteotomy on knee motion during gait and one medial-plateau force during standing, and the relationships between these factors and the result. Correction of the tibiofemoral angle to 5 degrees of genu valgum or more produced the best and most lasting results. Stance-phase flexion-extension increased the rotation decreased in knees with good results while the other gait parameters were not significantly changed. Medial-plateau force was decreased by successful tibial osteotomy. The knees with the best and most lasting results had 7 degrees of stance-phase flexion-extension or more during walking and either a valgus tibiofemoral angle of 5 degrees or more or a medial-plateau force of 50 per cent of body weight or less.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 977627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  30 in total

Review 1.  Ten-year results of tibial osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis. The influence of overcorrection.

Authors:  S Odenbring; N Egund; B Hagstedt; J Larsson; A Lindstrand; S Toksvig-Larsen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  [Imaging and preoperative planning for osteotomies around the knee].

Authors:  D Pape; A Hoffmann; R Seil
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  A comparison of plate versus staple-and-cast fixation in maintaining femoral tibial alignment after valgus tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Mark M Harrison; James P Waddell
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  High valgus tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  S Bhan; P K Dave
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Deterioration of long-term results following high tibial osteotomy in patients under 60 years of age.

Authors:  G Papachristou; S Plessas; J Sourlas; C Levidiotis; E Chronopoulos; C Papachristou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Changes in in vivo knee loading with a variable-stiffness intervention shoe correlate with changes in the knee adduction moment.

Authors:  Jennifer C Erhart; Chris O Dyrby; Darryl D D'Lima; Clifford W Colwell; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Accuracy of high tibial osteotomy: comparison between open- and closed-wedge technique.

Authors:  S Hankemeier; P Mommsen; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski; J Brand; C Meyer; R Meller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Complications of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  James A W Tunggal; Gordon A Higgins; James P Waddell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Osteotomy around the knee: evolution, principles and results.

Authors:  J O Smith; A J Wilson; N P Thomas
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Correction accuracy and collateral laxity in open versus closed wedge high tibial osteotomy. A one-year randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Robert D A Gaasbeek; Loes Nicolaas; Willard J Rijnberg; Corne J M van Loon; Albert van Kampen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.