Literature DB >> 23285427

Comparison of the DNA Fragmentation and the Sperm Parameters after Processing by the Density Gradient and the Swim up Methods.

Iraj Amiri1, Marzieh Ghorbani, Safora Heshmati.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The swim up and the density-gradient centrifugation are the two main techniques which are used to separate the viable motile sperm fraction in the assisted reproductive technology. However, there are several published studies about these methods, but there is no sufficient evidence for recommending the superiority of one of them. This study was designed to study the efficiency of the swim-up and the density gradient techniques to recover the spermatozoa with a high degree of motility, a normal morphology and a low level of DNA fragmentation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 35 semen samples were included in the study. The semen samples were collected, one part of the semen was spread on a slide and the remainder was prepared by using the swim-up or the density gradient techniques. The recovered spermatozoa were evaluated for concentration, motility, and normal morphology. A comet assay was carried out to assay the DNA fragmentation in all the samples.
RESULTS: There were significant differences in the sperm parameters between the density gradient and the swim up techniques. Also, the swim-up technique showed a significantly higher level of DNA fragmentation as compare to the density gradient technique.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated several benefits of the gradients method in the separation of normal and motile spermatozoa with healthy DNA, in comparison to the swim up method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comet assay; Gradients sperm separation; Sperm; Swim up

Year:  2012        PMID: 23285427      PMCID: PMC3527767          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4198.2530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  18 in total

1.  Sperm swim-up techniques and DNA fragmentation.

Authors:  E V Younglai; D Holt; P Brown; A Jurisicova; R F Casper
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  C M Boomsma; M J Heineman; B J Cohlen; C Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

3.  Sperm processing by swim-up and density gradient is effective in elimination of sperm with DNA damage.

Authors:  Varshini Jayaraman; Dinesh Upadhya; Pratap Kumar Narayan; Satish Kumar Adiga
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Functional and ultrastructural features of DNA-fragmented human sperm.

Authors:  M Muratori; P Piomboni; E Baldi; E Filimberti; P Pecchioli; E Moretti; L Gambera; B Baccetti; R Biagiotti; G Forti; M Maggi
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

5.  Study of mitochondrial membrane potential, reactive oxygen species, DNA fragmentation and cell viability by flow cytometry in human sperm.

Authors:  Carole Marchetti; Guillaume Obert; André Deffosez; Pierre Formstecher; Philippe Marchetti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies.

Authors:  D Sakkas; G C Manicardi; M Tomlinson; M Mandrioli; D Bizzaro; P G Bianchi; U Bianchi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Adaptation to alkylation damage in DNA measured by the comet assay.

Authors:  K J Angelis; M McGuffie; M Menke; I Schubert
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Deterioration of plasma membrane is associated with activated caspases in human spermatozoa.

Authors:  Uwe Paasch; Sonja Grunewald; Guenter Fitzl; Hans-Juergen Glander
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

9.  Staining of human sperm with fluorochrome-labeled inhibitor of caspases to detect activated caspases: correlation with apoptosis and sperm parameters.

Authors:  Carole Marchetti; Miguel-Angel Gallego; André Defossez; Pierre Formstecher; Philippe Marchetti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 10.  Sperm preparation for ART.

Authors:  Ralf R Henkel; Wolf-Bernhard Schill
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.211

View more
  12 in total

1.  The effect of swim-up and gradient sperm preparation techniques on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragmentation in subfertile patients.

Authors:  Yuksel Oguz; Ismail Guler; Ahmet Erdem; Mehmet Firat Mutlu; Seyhan Gumuslu; Mesut Oktem; Nuray Bozkurt; Mehmet Erdem
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The pellet swim-up is the best technique for sperm preparation during in vitro fertilization procedures.

Authors:  Aldo Volpes; Francesca Sammartano; Simona Rizzari; Salvatore Gullo; Angelo Marino; Adolfo Allegra
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Oviductal epithelial cells selected boar sperm according to their functional characteristics.

Authors:  Rebeca López-Úbeda; Francisco A García-Vázquez; Joaquín Gadea; Carmen Matás
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Adverse effects of paternal obesity on the motile spermatozoa quality.

Authors:  Georges Raad; Joseph Azouri; Kamal Rizk; Nina S Zeidan; Jessica Azouri; Valérie Grandjean; Mira Hazzouri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Novel Techniques of Sperm Selection for Improving IVF and ICSI Outcomes.

Authors:  Iván Oseguera-López; Sara Ruiz-Díaz; Priscila Ramos-Ibeas; Serafín Pérez-Cerezales
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2019-11-29

6.  Semen preparation methods and sperm telomere length: density gradient centrifugation versus the swim up procedure.

Authors:  Feifei Zhao; Qingling Yang; Senlin Shi; Xiaoyan Luo; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Combination of density gradient centrifugation and swim-up methods effectively decreases morphologically abnormal sperms.

Authors:  Masaya Yamanaka; Kazuhisa Tomita; Shu Hashimoto; Hiroshi Matsumoto; Manabu Satoh; Hiromi Kato; Yoshihiko Hosoi; Masayasu Inoue; Yoshiharu Nakaoka; Yoshiharu Morimoto
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  Sperm DNA fragmentation and sex chromosome aneuploidy after swim-up versus density gradient centrifugation.

Authors:  Sung Woo Kim; Byung Chul Jee; Seul Ki Kim; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2017-12-31

9.  Can the SCD test and terminal uridine nick-end labeling by flow cytometry technique (TUNEL/FCM) be used interchangeably to measure sperm DNA damage in routine laboratory practice?

Authors:  Cécile Grèze; Aline Guttmann; Hanae Pons-Rejraji; Marie-Paule Vasson; Jacqueline Lornage; Lemlih Ouchchane; Florence Brugnon
Journal:  Basic Clin Androl       Date:  2019-12-26

10.  A Simple, Centrifugation-Free, Sperm-Sorting Device Eliminates the Risks of Centrifugation in the Swim-Up Method While Maintaining Functional Competence and DNA Integrity of Selected Spermatozoa.

Authors:  Huidrom Yaiphaba Meitei; Shubhashree Uppangala; Krishna Sharan; Srinidhi Gururajarao Chandraguthi; Arunkumar Radhakrishnan; Guruprasad Kalthur; Stefan Schlatt; Satish Kumar Adiga
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.