Literature DB >> 11527903

Sperm swim-up techniques and DNA fragmentation.

E V Younglai1, D Holt, P Brown, A Jurisicova, R F Casper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Swim-up techniques for sperm separation may have detrimental effects on sperm DNA. We wished to determine whether the normal swim-up method with centrifugation used in our laboratory, which involves a centrifugation step, was harmful to sperm compared with swim-up without centrifugation.
METHODS: Semen samples were obtained from patients undergoing IVF or andrology assessment. An aliquot was removed for fixation and subsequent DNA fragmentation determination. The remaining sample was divided into two equal parts, which were subjected to swim-up either with (normal swim-up) or without (direct-swim-up) centrifugation. Semen analysis was performed both before and after swim-up. DNA fragmentation, in spermatozoa previously fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, was assessed by the terminal transferase-mediated DNA end-labelling procedure (TUNEL). The percentage of spermatozoa with DNA damage after each swim-up technique was compared with that in the original semen sample.
RESULTS: DNA damage was <5% in most samples. No significant change in DNA fragmentation was observed between the two swim-up procedures, although the 'normal' swim-up sample had significantly less DNA fragmentation than the pre-swim-up sample.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that our normal swim-up technique caused no more DNA damage to spermatozoa from normal semen samples than a direct swim-up technique that involved no centrifugation step.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11527903     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  28 in total

1.  The ability of sperm selection techniques to remove single- or double-strand DNA damage.

Authors:  María Enciso; Miriam Iglesias; Isabel Galán; Jonás Sarasa; Antonio Gosálvez; Jaime Gosálvez
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Comparison of the DNA Fragmentation and the Sperm Parameters after Processing by the Density Gradient and the Swim up Methods.

Authors:  Iraj Amiri; Marzieh Ghorbani; Safora Heshmati
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2012-11

3.  Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection outcomes: the role of sperm preparation techniques.

Authors:  Edson Borges; Amanda Souza Setti; Livia Vingris; Rita de Cassia Savio Figueira; Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Assumpto Iaconelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The effect of swim-up and gradient sperm preparation techniques on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragmentation in subfertile patients.

Authors:  Yuksel Oguz; Ismail Guler; Ahmet Erdem; Mehmet Firat Mutlu; Seyhan Gumuslu; Mesut Oktem; Nuray Bozkurt; Mehmet Erdem
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Effects of laser-assisted thinning versus opening on clinical outcomes according to maternal age in patients with repeated implantation failure.

Authors:  Jung-Woo Lee; Jeong-Ho Cha; Sun-Hee Shin; Yun-Jeong Kim; Seul-Ki Lee; Choon-Keun Park; Kyung-Ah Pak; Ji-Sung Yoon; Seo-Young Park
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 6.  Simulating nature in sperm selection for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Erica T Y Leung; Cheuk-Lun Lee; Xinyi Tian; Kevin K W Lam; Raymond H W Li; Ernest H Y Ng; William S B Yeung; Philip C N Chiu
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Does Microfluidic Sperm Sorting Affect Embryo Euploidy Rates in Couples with High Sperm DNA Fragmentation?

Authors:  Müge Keskin; Emre Göksan Pabuçcu; Tufan Arslanca; Özgür Doğuş Demirkıran; Recai Pabuçcu
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.060

8.  Desialylation of Spermatozoa and Epithelial Cell Glycocalyx Is a Consequence of Bacterial Infection of the Epididymis.

Authors:  Farhad Khosravi; Vera Michel; Christina E Galuska; Sudhanshu Bhushan; Philipp Christian; Hans-Christian Schuppe; Adrian Pilatz; Sebastian P Galuska; Andreas Meinhardt
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Machine learning for sperm selection.

Authors:  Jae Bem You; Christopher McCallum; Yihe Wang; Jason Riordon; Reza Nosrati; David Sinton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Smart RISUG: a potential new contraceptive and its magnetic field-mediated sperm interaction.

Authors:  Rakhi K Jha; Pradeep K Jha; Sujoy K Guha
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2009-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.