Literature DB >> 32734563

A Simple, Centrifugation-Free, Sperm-Sorting Device Eliminates the Risks of Centrifugation in the Swim-Up Method While Maintaining Functional Competence and DNA Integrity of Selected Spermatozoa.

Huidrom Yaiphaba Meitei1, Shubhashree Uppangala1, Krishna Sharan2, Srinidhi Gururajarao Chandraguthi2, Arunkumar Radhakrishnan3, Guruprasad Kalthur1, Stefan Schlatt4, Satish Kumar Adiga5.   

Abstract

This pilot study was conducted to explore the benefits of using a centrifugation-free device based on the migration-sedimentation (MS) technique over centrifugation-based techniques in selecting competent spermatozoa, as compared with using split human semen samples. Ejaculates from 35 men undergoing semen analysis were split into four parts where one part was retained as the neat (NE) and the other three parts were subjected to sperm selection by using migration-sedimentation (MS), density gradient (DG) separation, and swim-up (SU) techniques. Sperm functional characteristics along with mitochondrial integrity, tyrosine phosphorylation, acrosome reaction, and ultrastructure were measured. The ability of selection techniques in reducing spontaneous and radiation-induced sperm DNA lesions was assessed by the TUNEL assay. In results, MS-selected spermatozoa had higher viability (P < 0.001), longevity in terms of total motility at the end of 6 and 18 h post-extraction (P < 0.001), and mitochondrial integrity (P < 0.001) compared with those selected by DG. Furthermore, spontaneous DNA lesions were significantly reduced in MS and SU fractions compared with NE (P < 0.001). Similarly, radiation-induced sperm DNA lesions were significantly lower in MS and SU fractions (P < 0.001) compared with DG. Ultrastructural analysis using scanning electron microscopy suggested a moderate, non-significant increase in the number of spermatozoa with normal head and mid-piece in MS fraction compared with other methods. In conclusion, the MS-based device offers a centrifugation-free, efficient, and reliable sperm selection method, making it suitable for partially equipped intra-uterine insemination (IUI) laboratories or office IUI programmes. Further research should focus on the safety and clinical usefulness of the device in assisted conception programmes in general and IUI in specific.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; MIGLIS; Migration–sedimentation; Sperm function; Sperm preparation; Swim-up

Year:  2020        PMID: 32734563      PMCID: PMC7782414          DOI: 10.1007/s43032-020-00269-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  41 in total

1.  Sperm preparation techniques and iatrogenic failures of in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  D Mortimer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  The Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA(®)) and other sperm DNA fragmentation tests for evaluation of sperm nuclear DNA integrity as related to fertility.

Authors:  Donald P Evenson
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.145

Review 3.  Techniques used for IUI: is it time for a change?

Authors:  L Lemmens; S Kos; C Beijer; D D M Braat; W L D M Nelen; A M M Wetzels
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  The pellet swim-up is the best technique for sperm preparation during in vitro fertilization procedures.

Authors:  Aldo Volpes; Francesca Sammartano; Simona Rizzari; Salvatore Gullo; Angelo Marino; Adolfo Allegra
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Influence of semen processing technique on human sperm DNA integrity.

Authors:  A Zini; A Finelli; D Phang; K Jarvi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Reactive oxygen species: potential cause for DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa.

Authors:  S Lopes; A Jurisicova; J G Sun; R F Casper
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Iatrogenic DNA damage induced in human spermatozoa during sperm preparation: protective significance of seminal plasma.

Authors:  J Twigg; D S Irvine; P Houston; N Fulton; L Michael; R J Aitken
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Sperm quality after density gradient centrifugation with three commercially available media: a controlled trial.

Authors:  Helena Malvezzi; Rakesh Sharma; Ashok Agarwal; Adel M Abuzenadah; Muhammad Abu-Elmagd
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 9.  Measuring Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Clinical Outcomes of Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Maartje Cissen; Madelon van Wely; Irma Scholten; Steven Mansell; Jan Peter de Bruin; Ben Willem Mol; Didi Braat; Sjoerd Repping; Geert Hamer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sperm Chromatin Immaturity Observed in Short Abstinence Ejaculates Affects DNA Integrity and Longevity In Vitro.

Authors:  Shubhashree Uppangala; Sherine Eliza Mathai; Sujith Raj Salian; Dayanidhi Kumar; Vikram Jeet Singh; Fiona D'Souza; Guruprasad Kalthur; Asha Kamath; Satish Kumar Adiga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  The enriched Y-bearing sperm combined with delayed fixed-time artificial insemination for obtaining male Simmental crossbred offspring.

Authors:  Dewa Ketut Meles; Imam Mustofa; Mas'ud Hariadi; Wurlina Wurlina; Suherni Susilowati; Anny Amaliya; Suparto Suparto; Rimayanti Rimayanti
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-01-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.