Literature DB >> 23283755

Field demonstration and evaluation of the Passive Flux Meter on a CAH groundwater plume.

G Verreydt1, M D Annable, S Kaskassian, I Van Keer, J Bronders, L Diels, P Vanderauwera.   

Abstract

This study comprises the first application of the Passive Flux Meter (PFM) for the measurement of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbon (CAH) mass fluxes and Darcy water fluxes in groundwater at a European field site. The PFM was originally developed and applied to measurements near source zones. The focus of the PFM is extended from near source to plume zones. For this purpose, 48 PFMs of 1.4 m length were constructed and installed in eight different monitoring wells in the source and plume zone of a CAH-contaminated field site located in France. The PFMs were retrieved, sampled, and analyzed after 3 to 11 weeks of exposure time, depending on the expected contaminant flux. PFM evaluation criteria include analytical, technical, and practical aspects as well as conditions and applicability. PFM flux data were compared with so-called traditional soil and groundwater concentration data obtained using active sampling methods. The PFMs deliver reasonable results for source as well as plume zones. The limiting factor in the PFM applicability is the exposure time together with the groundwater flux. Measured groundwater velocities at the field site range from 2 to 41 cm/day. Measured contaminant flux data raise up to 13 g/m(2)/day for perchloroethylene in the plume zone. Calculated PFM flux averaged concentration data and traditional concentration data were of similar magnitude for most wells. However, both datasets need to be compared with reservation because of the different sampling nature and time. Two important issues are the PFM tracer loss during installation/extraction and the deviation of the groundwater flow field when passing the monitoring well and PFM. The demonstration of the PFM at a CAH-contaminated field site in Europe confirmed the efficiency of the flux measurement technique for source as well as plume zones. The PFM can be applied without concerns in monitoring wells with European standards. The acquired flux data are of great value for the purpose of site characterization and mass discharge modeling, and can be used in combination with traditional soil and groundwater sampling methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23283755     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-1417-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  9 in total

1.  A hybrid method for inverse characterization of subsurface contaminant flux.

Authors:  Mark Newman; Kirk Hatfield; Joel Hayworth; P S C Rao; Tom Stauffer
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 3.188

2.  Field-scale evaluation of the passive flux meter for simultaneous measurement of groundwater and contaminant fluxes.

Authors:  Michael D Annable; Kirk Hatfield; Jaehyun Cho; Harald Klammler; Beth L Parker; John A Cherry; P Suresh C Rao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  A direct passive method for measuring water and contaminant fluxes in porous media.

Authors:  Kirk Hatfield; Michael Annable; Jaehyun Cho; P S C Rao; Harald Klammler
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.188

4.  Contaminant plume classification system based on mass discharge.

Authors:  Charles J Newell; Shahla K Farhat; David T Adamson; Brian B Looney
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Flux-based risk management strategy of groundwater pollutions: the CMF approach.

Authors:  G Verreydt; I Van Keer; J Bronders; L Diels; P Vanderauwera
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Impact of in situ chemical oxidation on contaminant mass discharge: linking source-zone and plume-scale characterizations of remediation performance.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; K C Carroll; T Allen; J Baker; W Diguiseppi; J Hatton; C Morrison; A Russo; J Berkompas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Flux-based assessment at a manufacturing site contaminated with trichloroethylene.

Authors:  Nandita B Basu; P S C Rao; Irene C Poyer; M D Annable; K Hatfield
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 3.188

8.  Integration of traditional and innovative characterization techniques for flux-based assessment of dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) sites.

Authors:  Nandita B Basu; P Suresh; C Rao; Irene C Poyer; Subhas Nandy; Megharaj Mallavarapu; Ravi Naidu; Greg B Davis; Bradley M Patterson; Michael D Annable; Kirk Hatfield
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 3.188

9.  Changes in contaminant mass discharge from DNAPL source mass depletion: evaluation at two field sites.

Authors:  Michael C Brooks; A Lynn Wood; Michael D Annable; Kirk Hatfield; Jaehyun Cho; Charles Holbert; P Suresh C Rao; Carl G Enfield; Kira Lynch; Richard E Smith
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.188

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Source strength functions from long-term monitoring data and spatially distributed mass discharge measurements.

Authors:  Michael C Brooks; A Lynn Wood; Jaehyun Cho; Christine A P Williams; William Brandon; Michael D Annable
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.188

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.