Literature DB >> 16201648

Field-scale evaluation of the passive flux meter for simultaneous measurement of groundwater and contaminant fluxes.

Michael D Annable1, Kirk Hatfield, Jaehyun Cho, Harald Klammler, Beth L Parker, John A Cherry, P Suresh C Rao.   

Abstract

A new method, passive flux meter (PFM), has been developed and field-tested for simultaneously measuring contaminant and groundwater fluxes in the saturated zone at hazardous waste sites. The PFM approach uses a sorptive permeable medium placed in either a borehole or monitoring well to intercept contaminated groundwater and release "resident" tracers. The sorbent pack is placed in a groundwater flow field for a specified exposure time and then recovered for extraction and analysis. By quantifying the mass fraction of resident tracers lost and the mass of contaminant sorbed, groundwater and contaminant fluxes are calculated. Here, we assessed the performance of PFMs at the Canadian Forces Base Borden field site in Ontario, Canada. Two field tests were conducted under imposed groundwater flow fields: (1) radial flow to a well and (2) linear flow in a test channel confined by sheet pile walls on three sides. Both tests demonstrate that the local fluxes measured by PFM and averaged overthe screen interval were within 15% of imposed groundwaterflow and within 30% of measured contaminant mass flux. Patterns in depth variations in groundwater and contaminant fluxes, determined by the PFM approach, allow for site characterization at a higher spatial resolution. These results support the PMF method as a potential innovative alternative for measuring groundwater and contaminant fluxes in screened wells.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16201648     DOI: 10.1021/es050074g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  Source strength functions from long-term monitoring data and spatially distributed mass discharge measurements.

Authors:  Michael C Brooks; A Lynn Wood; Jaehyun Cho; Christine A P Williams; William Brandon; Michael D Annable
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.188

2.  Flux-based risk management strategy of groundwater pollutions: the CMF approach.

Authors:  G Verreydt; I Van Keer; J Bronders; L Diels; P Vanderauwera
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  An ex situ evaluation of TBA- and MTBE-baited bio-traps.

Authors:  Katharine P North; Douglas M Mackay; Michael D Annable; Kerry L Sublette; Greg Davis; Reef B Holland; Daniel Petersen; Kate M Scow
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Field demonstration and evaluation of the Passive Flux Meter on a CAH groundwater plume.

Authors:  G Verreydt; M D Annable; S Kaskassian; I Van Keer; J Bronders; L Diels; P Vanderauwera
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.