Literature DB >> 16581154

Flux-based assessment at a manufacturing site contaminated with trichloroethylene.

Nandita B Basu1, P S C Rao, Irene C Poyer, M D Annable, K Hatfield.   

Abstract

Groundwater and contaminant fluxes were measured, using the passive flux meter (PFM) technique, in wells along a longitudinal transect passing approximately through the centerline of a trichloroethylene (TCE) plume at a former manufacturing plant located in the Midwestern US. Two distinct zones of hydraulic conductivity were identified from the measured groundwater fluxes; a 6-m-thick upper zone ( approximately 7 m to 13 m below the ground surface or bgs) with a geometric mean Darcy flux (q(0)) of 2 cm/day, and a lower zone ( approximately 13 m to 16.5m bgs) with a q(0) approximately 15 cm/day; this important hydrogeologic feature significantly impacts any remediation technology used at the site. The flux-averaged TCE concentrations estimated from the PFM results compared well with existing groundwater monitoring data. It was estimated that at least 800 kg of TCE was present in the source zone. The TCE mass discharge across the source control plane (85 m x 38 m) was used to estimate the "source strength" ( approximately 365 g/day), while mass discharges across multiple down-gradient control planes were used to estimate the plume-averaged, TCE degradation rate constant (0.52 year(-1)). This is close to the rate estimated using the conventional centerline approach (0.78 year(-1)). The mass discharge approach provides a more robust and representative estimate than the centerline approach since the latter uses only data from wells along the plume centerline while the former uses all wells in the plume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16581154     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contam Hydrol        ISSN: 0169-7722            Impact factor:   3.188


  5 in total

1.  Source strength functions from long-term monitoring data and spatially distributed mass discharge measurements.

Authors:  Michael C Brooks; A Lynn Wood; Jaehyun Cho; Christine A P Williams; William Brandon; Michael D Annable
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.188

2.  Flux-based risk management strategy of groundwater pollutions: the CMF approach.

Authors:  G Verreydt; I Van Keer; J Bronders; L Diels; P Vanderauwera
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Borehole Diffusive Flux Apparatus for Characterizing Diffusive Mass-transfer in Subsurface Systems.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Kenneth C Carroll; Zhilin Guo; Jon Mainhagu
Journal:  Environ Earth Sci       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.784

4.  Modified Well-Field Configurations for Improved Performance of Contaminant Elution and Tracer Tests.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  Field demonstration and evaluation of the Passive Flux Meter on a CAH groundwater plume.

Authors:  G Verreydt; M D Annable; S Kaskassian; I Van Keer; J Bronders; L Diels; P Vanderauwera
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.