Literature DB >> 23283673

Can joint contact dynamics be restored by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Yuichi Hoshino1, Freddie H Fu, James J Irrgang, Scott Tashman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rotational kinematics has become an important consideration after ACL reconstruction because of its possible influence on knee degeneration. However, it remains unknown whether ACL reconstruction can restore both rotational kinematics and normal joint contact patterns, especially during functional activities. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether knee kinematics (tibial anterior translation and axial rotation) and joint contact mechanics (tibiofemoral sliding distance) would be restored by double-bundle (DB) or single-bundle (SB) reconstruction.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 17 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction by the SB (n = 7) or DB (n = 10) procedure. We used dynamic stereo x-ray to capture biplane radiographic images of the knee during downhill treadmill running. Tibial anterior translation, axial rotation, and joint sliding distance in the medial and lateral compartments were compared between reconstructed and contralateral knees in both SB and DB groups.
RESULTS: We observed reduced anterior tibial translation and increased knee rotation in the reconstructed knees compared to the contralateral knees in both SB and DB groups. The mean joint sliding distance on the medial compartment was larger in the reconstructed knees than in the contralateral knees for both the SB group (9.5 ± 3.9 mm versus 7.5 ± 4.3 mm) and the DB group (11.1 ± 1.3 mm versus 7.9 ± 3.8 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: Neither ACL reconstruction procedure restored normal knee kinematics or medial joint sliding. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Further study is necessary to understand the clinical significance of abnormal joint contact, identify the responsible mechanisms, and optimize reconstruction procedures for restoring normal joint mechanics after ACL injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23283673      PMCID: PMC3734431          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2761-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  39 in total

1.  Quadriceps tendon: the forgotten graft.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Kenneth D Illingworth; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  The anatomic approach to primary, revision and augmentation anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Verena M Schreiber; T Thomas Liu; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A comparison of the effect of central anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on pivot-shift kinematics.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Volker Musahl; Padhraig O'Loughlin; Travis Maak; Musa Citak; Peter Dixon; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic analysis of knee rotational stability after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Alexander Tsarouhas; Michael Iosifidis; Dimitrios Kotzamitelos; Giannis Spyropoulos; Themistoklis Tsatalas; Giannis Giakas
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Intraoperative evaluation of anteroposterior and rotational stabilities in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: lower femoral tunnel placed single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Atsushi Kanaya; Mitsuo Ochi; Masataka Deie; Nobuo Adachi; Makoto Nishimori; Atsuo Nakamae
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Tibiofemoral joint kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee during a single-legged hop landing.

Authors:  Jessica M Deneweth; Michael J Bey; Scott G McLean; Terrence R Lock; Patricia A Kolowich; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Differences in tibial rotation during walking in ACL reconstructed and healthy contralateral knees.

Authors:  Sean F Scanlan; Ajit M W Chaudhari; Chris O Dyrby; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The effects of femoral graft placement on in vivo knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  E S Abebe; G M Utturkar; D C Taylor; C E Spritzer; J P Kim; C T Moorman; W E Garrett; L E DeFrate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Knee rotational laxity in a randomized comparison of single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrea Hemmerich; Willem van der Merwe; Marijka Batterham; Christopher L Vaughan
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Equal kinematics between central anatomic single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  Jason Y Ho; Aaron Gardiner; Vivek Shah; Mark E Steiner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  24 in total

1.  Changes in Joint Contact Mechanics in a Large Quadrupedal Animal Model After Partial Meniscectomy and a Focal Cartilage Injury.

Authors:  David J Heckelsmiller; M James Rudert; Thomas E Baer; Douglas R Pedersen; Douglas C Fredericks; Jessica E Goetz
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Clinical assessment of antero-medial rotational knee laxity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dinesh Sirisena; Enrica Papi; Eleanor Tillett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations.

Authors:  Christopher V Nagelli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Altered medial versus lateral hamstring muscle activity during hop testing in female athletes 1-6 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  K Briem; A M Ragnarsdóttir; S I Árnason; T Sveinsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Knee contact force asymmetries in patients who failed return-to-sport readiness criteria 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Emily S Gardinier; Stephanie Di Stasi; Kurt Manal; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  Functional knee assessment with advanced imaging.

Authors:  Keiko Amano; Qi Li; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

Review 7.  Stem cell therapy: a promising biological strategy for tendon-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Zi-Chen Hao; Shan-Zheng Wang; Xue-Jun Zhang; Jun Lu
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 6.831

8.  Cartilage Damage Is Related to ACL Stiffness in a Porcine Model of ACL Repair.

Authors:  Jillian E Beveridge; Benedikt L Proffen; Naga Padmini Karamchedu; Kaitlyn E Chin; Jakob T Sieker; Gary J Badger; Ata M Kiapour; Martha M Murray; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Knee Biomechanical Deficits During a Single-Leg Landing Task Are Addressed With Neuromuscular Training in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Athletes.

Authors:  Christopher V Nagelli; Stephanie Di Stasi; Samuel C Wordeman; Albert Chen; Rachel Tatarski; Joshua Hoffman; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.638

10.  Biomechanical Outcomes of Bridge-enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Are Influenced by Sex in a Preclinical Model.

Authors:  Ata M Kiapour; Braden C Fleming; Martha M Murray
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.