Literature DB >> 21227425

The effects of femoral graft placement on in vivo knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

E S Abebe1, G M Utturkar, D C Taylor, C E Spritzer, J P Kim, C T Moorman, W E Garrett, L E DeFrate.   

Abstract

Achieving anatomical graft placement remains a concern in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of femoral graft placement on the ability of ACL reconstruction to restore normal knee kinematics under in vivo loading conditions. Two different groups of patients were studied: one in which the femoral tunnel was placed near the anterior and proximal border of the ACL (anteroproximal group, n=12) and another where the femoral tunnel was placed near the center of the ACL (anatomic group, n=10) MR imaging and biplanar fluoroscopy were used to measure in vivo kinematics in these patients during a quasi-static lunge. Patients with anteroproximal graft placement had up to 3.4mm more anterior tibial translation, 1.1mm more medial tibial translation and 3.7° more internal tibial rotation compared to the contralateral side. Patients with anatomic graft placement had motion that more closely replicated that of the intact knee, with anterior tibial translation within 0.8mm, medial tibial translation within 0.5mm, and internal tibial rotation within 1°. Grafts placed anteroproximally on the femur likely provide insufficient restraint to these motions due to a more vertical orientation. Anatomical femoral placement of the graft is more likely to reproduce normal ACL orientation, resulting in a more stable knee. Therefore, achieving anatomical graft placement on the femur is crucial to restoring normal knee function and may decrease the rates of joint degeneration after ACL reconstruction.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21227425      PMCID: PMC3076087          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  46 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of operative or nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture--is sports activity a determining variable?

Authors:  C Fink; C Hoser; W Hackl; R A Navarro; K P Benedetto
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement.

Authors:  Yuji Yamamoto; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Savio L-Y Woo; Andrew H Van Scyoc; Yoshiyuki Takakura; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Transtibial versus anteromedial portal of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Iosif Gavriilidis; Efstathios K Motsis; Emilios E Pakos; Anastasios D Georgoulis; Gregory Mitsionis; Theodore A Xenakis
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques.

Authors:  Ermias S Abebe; C T Moorman; T Scott Dziedzic; Charles E Spritzer; R Lee Cothran; Dean C Taylor; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Comparison of 3-dimensional obliquity and anisometric characteristics of anterior cruciate ligament graft positions using surgical navigation.

Authors:  Andrew D Pearle; Fintan J Shannon; Carinne Granchi; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency alters the in vivo motion of the tibiofemoral cartilage contact points in both the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions.

Authors:  Guoan Li; Jeremy M Moses; Ramprasad Papannagari; Neil P Pathare; Louis E DeFrate; Thomas J Gill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  In vivo kinematics of the tibiotalar joint after lateral ankle instability.

Authors:  Adam M Caputo; Jun Y Lee; Chuck E Spritzer; Mark E Easley; James K DeOrio; James A Nunley; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts.

Authors:  Jason M Scopp; Louis E Jasper; Stephen M Belkoff; Claude T Moorman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  The contralateral knee joint in cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  Michal Kozanek; Samuel K Van de Velde; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Femoral tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: rationale of the two incision technique.

Authors:  Raffaele Garofalo; Biagio Moretti; Cyril Kombot; Lorenzo Moretti; Elyazid Mouhsine
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  47 in total

1.  Recent evolution of cruciate ligament surgery of the knee.

Authors:  Young-Bok Jung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-05-17

2.  Rotatory laxity evaluation of the knee using modified Slocum's test in open magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Toshiaki Izawa; Shuichi Matsuda; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Dynamic knee laxity measurement devices.

Authors:  Mattias Ahldén; Yuichi Hoshino; Kristian Samuelsson; Paulo Araujo; Volker Musahl; Jón Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The effect of tunnel placement on rotational stability after ACL reconstruction: evaluation with use of triaxial accelerometry in a porcine model.

Authors:  Aníbal Debandi; Akira Maeyama; Yuichi Hoshino; Shigehiro Asai; Bunsei Goto; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Three-dimensional isotropic magnetic resonance imaging can provide a reliable estimate of the native anterior cruciate ligament insertion site anatomy.

Authors:  Daisuke Araki; Eric Thorhauer; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael F Vignos; Jarred M Kaiser; Geoffrey S Baer; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Direct Visualization of Existing Footprint and Outside-In Drilling of the Femoral Tunnel in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Knee.

Authors:  E Grant Sutter; John A Anderson; William E Garrett
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-03-09

Review 8.  Review of evolution of tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Faizal Rayan; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Darryl Ramoutar; Sujith Konan; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

9.  Femoral-tibial fixation affects risk of revision and reoperation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft.

Authors:  Lindsey M Spragg; Heather A Prentice; Andrew Morris; Tadashi T Funahashi; Gregory B Maletis; Rick P Csintalan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  The effects of femoral graft placement on cartilage thickness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eziamaka C Okafor; Gangadhar M Utturkar; Margaret R Widmyer; Ermias S Abebe; Amber T Collins; Dean C Taylor; Charles E Spritzer; C T Moorman; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.