| Literature DB >> 23282172 |
Ibrahim Sangare1, Yannis Michalakis, Bienvenue Yameogo, Roch Dabire, Isabelle Morlais, Anna Cohuet.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The question whether Plasmodium falciparum infection affects the fitness of mosquito vectors remains open. A hurdle for resolving this question is the lack of appropriate control, non-infected mosquitoes that can be compared to the infected ones. It was shown recently that heating P. falciparum gametocyte-infected blood before feeding by malaria vectors inhibits the infection. Therefore, the same source of gametocyte-infected blood could be divided in two parts, one heated, serving as the control, the other unheated, allowing the comparison of infected and uninfected mosquitoes which fed on exactly the same blood otherwise. However, before using this method for characterizing the cost of infection to mosquitoes, it is necessary to establish whether feeding on previously heated blood affects the survival and fecundity of mosquito females.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23282172 PMCID: PMC3543248 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Statistical analysis of effects on females survival
| Heat treatment | 1 | 1.441 | 0.2300 |
| Blood donor | 4 | 95.705 | <.0001 |
| Heat treatment* Blood donor | 4 | 3.114 | 0.5390 |
| Wing length | 1 | 8.087 | 0.0045 |
| Haematin | 1 | 10.240 | 0.0014 |
Analysis of the effect of blood heat treatment, blood donor and their interaction on female mosquito survival after the blood meal using the Cox Proportional Hazards model.
Figure 1Survival curves. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival of female mosquitoes after a blood meal as a function of whether the blood had been previously heated (in red) or not (in blue) (A) or as a function of blood donor (B). In A, survival curves between females fed on heated versus non-heated blood are not significantly different according to the Cox Proportional Hazards tests (P = 0.46). In B, survival curves between females fed on blood from different blood donors are significantly different according to the Cox Proportional Hazards tests (P <0.001).
Statistical analysis of effects on development of at least one egg in
| Heat treatment | 1 | 0.304 | 0.5816 |
| Blood donor | 4 | 5.611 | 0.2302 |
| Heat treatment *Blood donor | 4 | 1.829 | 0.7672 |
| Wing length | 1 | 1.811 | 0.1784 |
| Haematin | 1 | 20.151 | <.0001 |
Nominal logistic regression on whether a female laid any eggs as a function of blood treatment, blood donor, their interaction, female wing length and quantity of haematin excreted.
Statistical analysis of effects on number of eggs developed in
| Heat treatment | 1 | 1921.585 | 1.3775 | 0.2414 |
| Blood donor | 4 | 24304.107 | 4.3557 | 0.0019 |
| Heat treatment *Blood donor | 4 | 8354.035 | 1.4972 | 0.2027 |
| Wing length | 1 | 68160.616 | 48.8617 | <.0001 |
| Haematin | 1 | 3889.278 | 2.7881 | 0.0959 |
Analysis of variance of the number of eggs developed per female as a function of blood treatment, blood donor and their interaction, female wing length and haematin excreted (model R2 = 0.24).
Figure 2Eggs numbers. Number of eggs per dissected female for each blood donor and blood treatment (circles for heated blood and triangles for non-heated blood). Horizontal bars indicate median.
Statistical analysis of effects on blood meal size in
| Heat treatment | 1 | 3.4092 | 0.0756 | 0.7835 |
| Blood donor | 4 | 1165.2930 | 6.4596 | <.0001 |
| Heat treatment *Blood donor | 4 | 346.0512 | 1.9183 | 0.1062 |
Analysis of variance of the quantity of haematin excreted as a function of blood treatment and blood donor (model R2 = 0.07).