Literature DB >> 17017216

Reproductive output of female Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae): comparison of molecular forms.

A S Yaro1, A Dao, A Adamou, J E Crawford, S F Traoré, A M Touré, R Gwadz, T Lehmann.   

Abstract

Knowledge of ecological differences between the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) might lead to understanding of their unique contribution to disease transmission, to better vector control, and to identification of the forces that have separated them. We compared female fecundity measured as egg batch size in relation to body size between the molecular forms in Mali and contrasted them with their sibling species, Anopheles arabiensis Patton. To determine whether eggs of different egg batches are of similar "quality," we compared the total protein content of first-stage larvae (L1s), collected < 2 h after hatching in deionized water. Egg batch size significantly varied between An. gambiae and An. arabiensis and between the molecular forms of An. gambiae (mean batch size was 186.3, 182.5, and 162.0 eggs in An. arabiensis and the M and the S molecular form of An. gambiae, respectively). After accommodating female body size, however, the difference in batch size was not significant. In the S molecular form, egg protein content was not correlated with egg batch size (r = -0.08, P > 0.7) nor with female body size (r = -0.18, P > 0.4), suggesting that females with more resources invest in more eggs rather than in higher quality eggs. The mean total protein in eggs of the M form (0.407 microg per L1) was 6% higher than that of the S form (0.384 microg per L1), indicating that the M form invests a greater portion of her resources into current (rather than future) reproduction. A greater investment per offspring coupled with larger egg batch size may reflect an adaptation of the M form to low productivity larval sites as independent evidence suggests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17017216     DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)43[833:roofag]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  14 in total

1.  Comparative analyses reveal discrepancies among results of commonly used methods for Anopheles gambiaemolecular form identification.

Authors:  Federica Santolamazza; Beniamino Caputo; Maria Calzetta; José L Vicente; Emiliano Mancini; Vincenzo Petrarca; João Pinto; Alessandra della Torre
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.979

2.  Dry season reproductive depression of Anopheles gambiae in the Sahel.

Authors:  Alpha S Yaro; Adama I Traoré; Diana L Huestis; Abdoulaye Adamou; Seydou Timbiné; Yaya Kassogué; Moussa Diallo; Adama Dao; Sékou F Traoré; Tovi Lehmann
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.354

3.  Reproduction-longevity trade-off in Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Adama Dao; Yaya Kassogue; Abdoulaye Adamou; Moussa Diallo; Alpha Seydou Yaro; Sekou F Traore; Tovi Lehmann
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.278

Review 4.  Anopheline Reproductive Biology: Impacts on Vectorial Capacity and Potential Avenues for Malaria Control.

Authors:  Sara N Mitchell; Flaminia Catteruccia
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 5.  The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective.

Authors:  Tovi Lehmann; Abdoulaye Diabate
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.342

6.  A user-friendly software to easily count Anopheles egg batches.

Authors:  Ali Mollahosseini; Marie Rossignol; Cédric Pennetier; Anna Cohuet; António Dos Anjos; Fabrice Chandre; Hamid Reza Shahbazkia
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  A dynamic model of some malaria-transmitting anopheline mosquitoes of the Afrotropical region. I. Model description and sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Torleif Markussen Lunde; Diriba Korecha; Eskindir Loha; Asgeir Sorteberg; Bernt Lindtjørn
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  The effects of oviposition-site deprivation on Anopheles gambiae reproduction.

Authors:  Kathryne L Dieter; Diana L Huestis; Tovi Lehmann
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Studying fitness cost of Plasmodium falciparum infection in malaria vectors: validation of an appropriate negative control.

Authors:  Ibrahim Sangare; Yannis Michalakis; Bienvenue Yameogo; Roch Dabire; Isabelle Morlais; Anna Cohuet
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Evidence for divergent selection between the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: role of predation.

Authors:  Abdoulaye Diabaté; Roch K Dabiré; Kyle Heidenberger; Jacob Crawford; William O Lamp; Lauren E Culler; Tovi Lehmann
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.