Literature DB >> 21844236

Infection intensity-dependent responses of Anopheles gambiae to the African malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum.

Antonio M Mendes1, Parfait H Awono-Ambene, Sandrine E Nsango, Anna Cohuet, Didier Fontenille, Fotis C Kafatos, George K Christophides, Isabelle Morlais, Dina Vlachou.   

Abstract

Malaria remains a devastating disease despite efforts at control and prevention. Extensive studies using mostly rodent infection models reveal that successful Plasmodium parasite transmission by the African mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae depends on finely tuned vector-parasite interactions. Here we investigate the transcriptional response of A. gambiae to geographically related Plasmodium falciparum populations at various infection intensities and different infection stages. These responses are compared with those of mosquitoes infected with the rodent parasite Plasmodium berghei. We demonstrate that mosquito responses are largely dependent on the intensity of infection. A major transcriptional suppression of genes involved in the regulation of midgut homeostasis is detected in low-intensity P. falciparum infections, the most common type of infection in Africa. Importantly, genes transcriptionally induced during these infections tend to be phylogenetically unique to A. gambiae. These data suggest that coadaptation between vectors and parasites may act to minimize the impact of infection on mosquito fitness by selectively suppressing specific functional classes of genes. RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated gene silencing provides initial evidence for important roles of the mosquito G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in controlling infection intensity-dependent antiparasitic responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21844236      PMCID: PMC3257935          DOI: 10.1128/IAI.05647-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  31 in total

Review 1.  Insect G protein-coupled receptors and signal transduction.

Authors:  J V Broeck
Journal:  Arch Insect Biochem Physiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.698

2.  GeneMerge--post-genomic analysis, data mining, and hypothesis testing.

Authors:  Cristian I Castillo-Davis; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  G protein-coupled receptors in Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Catherine A Hill; A Nicole Fox; R Jason Pitts; Lauren B Kent; Perciliz L Tan; Mathew A Chrystal; Anibal Cravchik; Frank H Collins; Hugh M Robertson; Laurence J Zwiebel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Immune response of Anopheles gambiae to the early sporogonic stages of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Rachida Tahar; Christian Boudin; Isabelle Thiery; Catherine Bourgouin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-12-16       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Anopheles gambiae PGRPLC-mediated defense against bacteria modulates infections with malaria parasites.

Authors:  Stephan Meister; Bogos Agianian; Fanny Turlure; Angela Relógio; Isabelle Morlais; Fotis C Kafatos; George K Christophides
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 6.823

6.  Polymorphisms in Anopheles gambiae immune genes associated with natural resistance to Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Caroline Harris; Louis Lambrechts; François Rousset; Luc Abate; Sandrine E Nsango; Didier Fontenille; Isabelle Morlais; Anna Cohuet
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 6.823

7.  The role of reactive oxygen species on Plasmodium melanotic encapsulation in Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kumar; George K Christophides; Rafael Cantera; Bradley Charles; Yeon Soo Han; Stephan Meister; George Dimopoulos; Fotis C Kafatos; Carolina Barillas-Mury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Effects of mosquito genes on Plasmodium development.

Authors:  Mike A Osta; George K Christophides; Fotis C Kafatos
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Anopheles mortality is both age- and Plasmodium-density dependent: implications for malaria transmission.

Authors:  Emma J Dawes; Thomas S Churcher; Shijie Zhuang; Robert E Sinden; María-Gloria Basáñez
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Implication of the mosquito midgut microbiota in the defense against malaria parasites.

Authors:  Yuemei Dong; Fabio Manfredini; George Dimopoulos
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 6.823

View more
  28 in total

1.  Molecular Profiling of Phagocytic Immune Cells in Anopheles gambiae Reveals Integral Roles for Hemocytes in Mosquito Innate Immunity.

Authors:  Ryan C Smith; Jonas G King; Dingyin Tao; Oana A Zeleznik; Clara Brando; Gerhard G Thallinger; Rhoel R Dinglasan
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  The Peptidoglycan Recognition Proteins PGRPLA and PGRPLB Regulate Anopheles Immunity to Bacteria and Affect Infection by Plasmodium.

Authors:  Mathilde Gendrin; Fanny Turlure; Faye H Rodgers; Anna Cohuet; Isabelle Morlais; George K Christophides
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 7.349

3.  Anopheles Imd pathway factors and effectors in infection intensity-dependent anti-Plasmodium action.

Authors:  Lindsey S Garver; Ana C Bahia; Suchismita Das; Jayme A Souza-Neto; Jessica Shiao; Yuemei Dong; George Dimopoulos
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 6.823

4.  Association mapping by pooled sequencing identifies TOLL 11 as a protective factor against Plasmodium falciparum in Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Seth N Redmond; Karin Eiglmeier; Christian Mitri; Kyriacos Markianos; Wamdaogo M Guelbeogo; Awa Gneme; Alison T Isaacs; Boubacar Coulibaly; Emma Brito-Fravallo; Gareth Maslen; Daniel Mead; Oumou Niare; Sekou F Traore; N'Fale Sagnon; Dominic Kwiatkowski; Michelle M Riehle; Kenneth D Vernick
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Transient knockdown of Anopheles stephensi LRIM1 using RNAi increases Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite salivary gland infections.

Authors:  Peter F Billingsley; Kasim I George; Abraham G Eappen; Robert A Harrell; Robert Alford; Tao Li; Sumana Chakravarty; B Kim Lee Sim; Stephen L Hoffman; David A O'Brochta
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.979

6.  Insecticide resistance alleles affect vector competence of Anopheles gambiae s.s. for Plasmodium falciparum field isolates.

Authors:  Haoues Alout; Nicaise Tuikue Ndam; Marcel Maurice Sandeu; Innocent Djégbe; Fabrice Chandre; Roch Kounbobr Dabiré; Luc Salako Djogbénou; Vincent Corbel; Anna Cohuet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Studying fitness cost of Plasmodium falciparum infection in malaria vectors: validation of an appropriate negative control.

Authors:  Ibrahim Sangare; Yannis Michalakis; Bienvenue Yameogo; Roch Dabire; Isabelle Morlais; Anna Cohuet
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Regulation of anti-Plasmodium immunity by a LITAF-like transcription factor in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Ryan C Smith; Abraham G Eappen; Andrea J Radtke; Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Diverged alleles of the Anopheles gambiae leucine-rich repeat gene APL1A display distinct protective profiles against Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Inge Holm; Catherine Lavazec; Thierry Garnier; Christian Mitri; Michelle M Riehle; Emmanuel Bischoff; Emma Brito-Fravallo; Eizo Takashima; Isabelle Thiery; Agnes Zettor; Stephane Petres; Catherine Bourgouin; Kenneth D Vernick; Karin Eiglmeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Costs of crowding for the transmission of malaria parasites.

Authors:  Laura C Pollitt; Thomas S Churcher; Emma J Dawes; Shahid M Khan; Mohammed Sajid; María-Gloria Basáñez; Nick Colegrave; Sarah E Reece
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.