Literature DB >> 23277419

Non-medical prescribers and pharmacovigilance: participation, competence and future needs.

Derek Stewart1, Katie MacLure, Vibhu Paudyal, Carmel Hughes, Molly Courtenay, James McLay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine UK non-medical prescribers' (NMPs) (supplementary or independent) current participation and self-reported competence in pharmacovigilance, and their perceptions of training and future needs.
SETTING: Non-medical prescribers in health care in the United Kingdom. Awareness of and participation in the Yellow Card Scheme (YCS); attitudes towards ADR reporting; strategies to encourage reporting; pharmacovigilance training; and demographics. The sample comprised nurse (n = 912) and pharmacist (n = 2,439) NMPs in the UK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported competence in pharmacovigilance, knowledge of and participation in the YCS, attitudes towards ADR reporting; strategies to encourage ADR reporting; pharmacovigilance training during NMP training.
RESULTS: Six hundred and thirteen responses were received giving an overall response rate of 20.4 %. Response rates for nurse and pharmacist prescribers were 32.2 % (n = 293) and 13.1 % (n = 320) respectively. Three hundred and fifty-nine respondents (58.6 %) had submitted a Yellow Card. Although the majority of respondents (70.4 %) felt competent in pharmacovigilance, a third (34.2 %) said they needed further training. Respondents reported a positive attitude towards ADR reporting, yet only a minority (22.9 %) correctly answered factual questions about the YCS. Approximately a third of respondents (35.6 %) "couldn't remember" if pharmacovigilance was covered in their prescribing training. Publicity and education were commonly suggested measures to enhance contribution to the YCS.
CONCLUSION: While NMPs report participation and competence in ADR reporting, there are several key issues to consider including the need for further training and support to optimise their role in pharmacovigilance.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23277419     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-012-9739-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  15 in total

Review 1.  Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients.

Authors:  E McColl; A Jacoby; L Thomas; J Soutter; C Bamford; N Steen; R Thomas; E Harvey; A Garratt; J Bond
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Attitudes and knowledge of hospital pharmacists to adverse drug reaction reporting.

Authors:  C F Green; D R Mottram; P H Rowe; M Pirmohamed
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Reporting of adverse drug reactions by nurses.

Authors:  Sally Morrison-Griffiths; Thomas J Walley; B Kevin Park; Alasdair M Breckenridge; Munir Pirmohamed
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-04-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Educating nonmedical prescribers.

Authors:  Derek Stewart; Katie MacLure; Johnson George
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Independent extended and supplementary nurse prescribing practice in the UK: a national questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Molly Courtenay; Nicola Carey; Joanna Burke
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 6.  Determinants of under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elena Lopez-Gonzalez; Maria T Herdeiro; Adolfo Figueiras
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Influence of attitudes on pharmacists' intention to report serious adverse drug events to the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Paul Gavaza; Carolyn M Brown; Kenneth A Lawson; Karen L Rascati; James P Wilson; Mary Steinhardt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  The involvement of nurses in reporting suspected adverse drug reactions: experience with the meningococcal vaccination scheme.

Authors:  S Sri Ranganathan; J E Houghton; D P Davies; P A Routledge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions : a systematic review.

Authors:  Lorna Hazell; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.228

Review 10.  Data quality management in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Marie Lindquist
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.228

View more
  10 in total

1.  Preaching to the converted - optimising adverse drug reaction reporting by dentists.

Authors:  M M Patel; D R Radford; D Brown
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  Pharmacists in pharmacovigilance: can increased diagnostic opportunity in community settings translate to better vigilance?

Authors:  Paul Rutter; David Brown; Justine Howard; Christine Randall
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Nonmedical prescribing: where are we now?

Authors:  Louise C Cope; Aseel S Abuzour; Mary P Tully
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2016-04-29

4.  A Comparative Safety Analysis of Medicines Based on the UK Pharmacovigilance and General Practice Prescribing Data in England.

Authors:  Kinan Mokbel; Rob Daniels; Michael N Weedon; Leigh Jackson
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Challenges to the consolidation of pharmacovigilance practices in Brazil: limitations of the hospital pharmacist.

Authors:  Paulo Henrique Santos Andrade; Amanda Carvalho Barreiros de Almeida; Ana Keilla Santana Dos Santos; Iza Maria Fraga Lobo; Francilene Amaral da Silva; Wellington Barros da Silva
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2020-07-31

6.  Awareness and compliance with pharmacovigilance requirements amongst UK oncology healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Rebecca J Thorne; Rosanne J Bruggink; Stephen J Kelly; Sarah Jl Payne; Simon J Purcell; David A Montgomery
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2018-02-08

7.  Nurses' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice in Relation to Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tahmine Salehi; Naiemeh Seyedfatemi; Mohammad Saeed Mirzaee; Maryam Maleki; Abbas Mardani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Impact of a Policy Change on Pharmacists' Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions.

Authors:  Renaud Roy; Janice Ma
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2018-08-28

Review 9.  Implementation of independent nurse prescribing in UK mental health settings: focus on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Lisa Mangle; Paula Phillips; Mark Pitts; Cathy Laver-Bradbury
Journal:  Atten Defic Hyperact Disord       Date:  2014-04-18

10.  Nonmedical prescriber experiences of training and competence to report adverse drug reactions in the UK.

Authors:  Andrew Thompson; Christine Randall; Justine Howard; Catrin Barker; Debbie Bowden; Paul Mooney; Agatha Munyika; Susan Smith; Munir Pirmohamed
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.512

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.