Literature DB >> 21332572

Influence of attitudes on pharmacists' intention to report serious adverse drug events to the Food and Drug Administration.

Paul Gavaza1, Carolyn M Brown, Kenneth A Lawson, Karen L Rascati, James P Wilson, Mary Steinhardt.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the influence of pharmacists' attitudes on intention to report serious adverse drug events (ADEs) to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a mail survey to collect data from hospital and community pharmacists practicing in Texas, United States. Three and 16 items were used to measure intention and attitudes, respectively, using a seven-point bipolar scale. Pharmacists' demographic and practice characteristics, and past reporting were also measured.
RESULTS: The response rate was 26.4% (n= 377/1500 pharmacists). Most pharmacists intended (n= 297, 78.8%) to report serious ADEs that they will encounter to the FDA through MedWatch. Overall, pharmacists held favourable attitudes towards reporting serious ADEs (mean = 24.5, SD = 6.7, possible range 1-49, neutral = 16). Pharmacists intending to report serious ADEs had more favourable attitudes than those who did not (P < 0.001). About 90% of the pharmacists believed that reporting serious ADEs would improve patient safety. However, 72.6% indicated that reporting serious ADEs was time consuming and over half (55.5%) of the respondents believed that reporting serious ADEs disrupted the normal workflow. Non-intenders held stronger beliefs that ADE reporting would disrupt the normal workflow and was time consuming compared with intenders. Years of experience, number of hours worked and practice setting were associated with pharmacists' attitudes towards reporting (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Most pharmacists held moderately favourable attitudes and high intentions toward reporting serious ADEs to the FDA. This study's findings contribute to an increased understanding of individual factors that influence pharmacists' attitude and intention towards reporting serious ADEs to the FDA.
© 2011 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21332572      PMCID: PMC3141196          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03944.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  51 in total

Review 1.  Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines.

Authors:  A S Adams; S B Soumerai; J Lomas; D Ross-Degnan
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Test of the Fishbein and Ajzen models as predictors of health care workers' glove use.

Authors:  P F Levin
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Postmarketing surveillance and adverse drug reactions: current perspectives and future needs.

Authors:  T Brewer; G A Colditz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Salient beliefs and intentions to prescribe antibiotics for patients with a sore throat.

Authors:  A. E. Walker; J. M. Grimshaw; E. M. Armstrong
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2001-11

Review 5.  The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors.

Authors:  G Godin; G Kok
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec

6.  Nurses' intention to report child abuse in Taiwan: a test of the theory of planned behavior.

Authors:  Jui-Ying Feng; Yow-Wu B Wu
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Physicians' attitudes and adverse drug reaction reporting : a case-control study in Portugal.

Authors:  Maria T Herdeiro; Adolfo Figueiras; Jorge Polónia; Juan Jesus Gestal-Otero
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Prediction of pharmacist intention to provide Medicare medication therapy management services using the theory of planned behavior.

Authors:  Kathleen E Herbert; Julie M Urmie; Brand A Newland; Karen B Farris
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2006-09

Review 9.  The role of hospital and community pharmacists in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  A C van Grootheest; L T W de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2005-03

10.  Applying theory of planned behavior to predict nurses' intention and volunteering to care for SARS patients in southern Taiwan.

Authors:  Nai-Ying Ko; Ming-Chu Feng; Dan-Ying Chiu; Mei-Hsin Wu; Jui-Ying Feng; Shung-Mei Pan
Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.744

View more
  24 in total

1.  Risk of medication safety incidents with antibiotic use measured by defined daily doses.

Authors:  Anas Hamad; Gillian Cavell; Paul Wade; James Hinton; Cate Whittlesea
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2013-06-21

2.  Pharmacy students' attitudes toward reporting serious adverse drug events.

Authors:  Paul Gavaza; Bihn Bui
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Non-medical prescribers and pharmacovigilance: participation, competence and future needs.

Authors:  Derek Stewart; Katie MacLure; Vibhu Paudyal; Carmel Hughes; Molly Courtenay; James McLay
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2013-01-01

4.  Adverse drug event reporting: awareness is not enough.

Authors:  Joyce A Generali
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-02

5.  Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Evaluate Factors That Influence PharmD Students' Intention to Attend Lectures.

Authors:  Erik Skoglund; Julianna Fernandez; Jeffrey T Sherer; Elizabeth A Coyle; Kevin W Garey; Marc L Fleming; Amelia K Sofjan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Patients' Perspectives on Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in a Developing Country: A Case Study from Ghana.

Authors:  George Tsey Sabblah; Delese Mimi Darko; Hudu Mogtari; Linda Härmark; Eugène van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Occurrences and Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Induced Vitiligo in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Samy Babai; Anne-Laure Voisin; Célia Bertin; Amandine Gouverneur; Hervé Le-Louet
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Bias in spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in Japan.

Authors:  Shinichi Matsuda; Kotonari Aoki; Takuya Kawamata; Tetsuji Kimotsuki; Takumi Kobayashi; Hiroshi Kuriki; Terumi Nakayama; Seigo Okugawa; Yoshihiko Sugimura; Minami Tomita; Yoichiro Takahashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Rare, serious, and comprehensively described suspected adverse drug reactions reported by surveyed healthcare professionals in Uganda.

Authors:  Ronald Kiguba; Charles Karamagi; Paul Waako; Helen B Ndagije; Sheila M Bird
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Impact of a Policy Change on Pharmacists' Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions.

Authors:  Renaud Roy; Janice Ma
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2018-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.