Literature DB >> 25060479

Preaching to the converted - optimising adverse drug reaction reporting by dentists.

M M Patel, D R Radford1, D Brown2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of knowledge and reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of dentists at different stages of their careers and conduct a training need analysis.
DESIGN: Structured questionnaires were distributed to final year dental students (DSs), foundation year one students (DF1s) and general dental practitioners (GDPs).
SETTING: Opportunity samples of DSs from Kings College London, DF1s from the postgraduate deaneries of Kent, Surrey and Sussex, and Oxford and GDPs in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. The study was conducted from November 2012 to February 2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative knowledge and awareness of ADRs and ADR reporting, and performance in an assessment of these aspects.
RESULTS: Thirty-one DSs, 35 DF1s and 98 GDPs took part in the study. Awareness of the Yellow Card Scheme varied between groups (30.8%, 48.6% and 88.8% respectively). Reported use of the scheme was uniformly low (2.6%, 5.7% and 5.1% respectively). There were no differences in knowledge about ADRs and ADR reporting between the three groups of dentists as indicated by median scores achieved in the questionnaire test (54%, 73% and 62% for DSs, DF1s and GDPs respectively; p = 0.638). All of the DSs, 91.4% of DF1s and 91.8% of GDPs said that they would welcome further training. Key topics included training on ADRs to medicines commonly used in their dental practice and deciding what ADRs needed to be reported. The most popular format for delivery of this training was formal lectures for DF1s and GDPs, but workshops for DSs. Postgraduate deaneries were the most popular provider choice for DF1s and GDPs.
CONCLUSIONS: Dentists at different stages of their careers showed variable awareness and knowledge of the UK Yellow Card Scheme and what to report. Training should be tailored to fit the needs of the different groups. A questionnaire survey incorporating a summative knowledge assessment demonstrated variable levels of knowledge about adverse drug reactions and what to report. Large majorities of all groups (>90%) expressed a desire for training in these areas and in the case of graduate and practising dentists, indicated that this should be organised by the postgraduate deaneries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25060479     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  11 in total

1.  Adverse drug reaction teaching in UK undergraduate medical and pharmacy programmes.

Authors:  A R Cox; J F Marriott; K A Wilson; R E Ferner
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 2.  Problem based learning.

Authors:  Diana F Wood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-08

3.  Pharmacovigilance teaching in UK undergraduate pharmacy programmes.

Authors:  Melvyn P Smith; Sherael D Webley
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Knowledge and attitudes to reporting adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Andrew Pulford; William Malcolm
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2010 Jul 22-Aug 11

Review 5.  The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gerald Choon-Huat Koh; Hoon Eng Khoo; Mee Lian Wong; David Koh
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Yellow card scheme.

Authors:  J Taylor; M N Pemberton
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Pharmacovigilance in clinical dentistry: overlooked or axiomatic?

Authors:  Sunitha Carnelio; Sohil Ahmed Khan; Gabriel Rodrigues
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

8.  Adverse drug reactions: when the risk becomes a reality for patients.

Authors:  Anthony R Cox; Tehreem F Butt
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Chlorhexidine and hypersensitivity reactions in dentistry.

Authors:  M N Pemberton; J Gibson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.626

10.  How do UK dentists deal with adverse drug reaction reporting?

Authors:  J Yip; D R Radford; D Brown
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.626

View more
  1 in total

1.  Summary of: preaching to the converted - optimising adverse drug reaction reporting by dentists.

Authors:  David Wray
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.626

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.