Literature DB >> 23274390

Detection rate of clinically insignificant prostate cancer increases with repeat prostate biopsies.

Bumsoo Park1, Seong-Soo Jeon, Sung-Ho Ju, Byong-Chang Jeong, Seong-Il Seo, Hyun-Moo Lee, Han-Yong Choi.   

Abstract

To analyze if clinically insignificant prostate cancer (CIPC) is more frequently detected with repeat prostate biopsies, we retrospectively analyzed the records of 2146 men diagnosed with prostate cancer after one or more prostate biopsies. The patients were divided into five groups according to the number of prostate biopsies obtained, e.g. group 1 had one biopsy, group 2 had two biopsies and group 3 had three biopsies. Of the 2146 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, 1956 (91.1%), 142 (6.6%), 38 (1.8%), 9 (0.4%) and 1 (0.1%) men were in groups 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Groups 4 and 5 were excluded because of the small sample sizes. The remaining three groups (groups 1, 2 and 3) were statistically analyzed. There were no differences in age or prostate-specific antigen level among the three groups. CIPC was detected in 201 (10.3%), 28 (19.7%) and 9 (23.7%) patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (P<0.001). A multivariate analysis showed that the number of biopsies was an independent predictor to detect CIPC (OR=2.688 for group 2; OR=4.723 for group 3). In conclusion, patients undergoing multiple prostate biopsies are more likely to be diagnosed with CIPC than those who only undergo one biopsy. However, the risk still exists that the patient could have clinically significant prostate cancer. Therefore, when counseling patients with regard to serial repeat biopsies, the possibility of prostate cancer overdiagnosis and overtreatment must be balanced with the continued risk of clinically significant disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23274390      PMCID: PMC3739144          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2012.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  27 in total

1.  Comparison of histologic grade between initial and follow-up biopsy in untreated, low to intermediate grade, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Choo; V Do; L Sugar; L Klotz; E Bahk; E Hong; C Danjoux; G Morton; G DeBoer
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.344

2.  Changes in molecular forms of prostate-specific antigen during treatment with finasteride.

Authors:  F España; M Martínez; M Royo; A Estellés; J M Alapont; S Navarro; J Aznar; J F Jiménez-Cruz
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; H Ballentine Carter; Sonja I Berndt; Winnie Ricker; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study.

Authors:  Joseph C Presti; Gerard J O'Dowd; M Craig Miller; Rubina Mattu; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop?

Authors:  B Djavan; V Ravery; A Zlotta; P Dobronski; M Dobrovits; M Fakhari; C Seitz; M Susani; A Borkowski; L Boccon-Gibod; C C Schulman; M Marberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Effect of finasteride on serum PSA concentration in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Results from the North American phase III clinical trial.

Authors:  H A Guess; J F Heyse; G J Gormley; E Stoner; J E Oesterling
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.241

7.  Improved detection of clinically significant, curable prostate cancer with systematic 12-core biopsy.

Authors:  Herb Singh; Eduardo I Canto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Dov Kadmon; Brian J Miles; Thomas M Wheeler; Kevin M Slawin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors. A contemporary analysis.

Authors:  Patrick J Bastian; Leslie A Mangold; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prostate cancer detection and tumor characteristics in men with multiple biopsy sessions.

Authors:  M Lujan; A Paez; C Santonja; T Pascual; I Fernandez; A Berenguer
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Clinical and pathologic features of prostate cancer detected after repeat false-negative biopsy in a screening population.

Authors:  Hannes Steiner; Patrizia Moser; Martina Hager; Andreas P Berger; Helmut Klocker; Robert Spranger; Hermann Rogatsch; Georg Bartsch; Wolfgang Horninger
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 4.104

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Marc A Bjurlin; Joseph Nicholson; Teuvo L Tammela; David F Penson; H Ballentine Carter; Peter Carroll; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Are 10-, 10-12-, or > 12-mm prostate biopsy core quality control cutoffs reasonable?

Authors:  Brunno C F Sanches; Ana Luiza Lalli; Wilmar Azal Neto; Athanase Billis; Leonardo Oliveira Reis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Clinicopathologic differences between prostate cancers detected during initial and repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in Korea.

Authors:  Dong Jin Park; Ki Ho Kim; Tae Gwon Kwon; Chun Ii Kim; Cheol Hee Park; Jae Shin Park; Duck Youn Kim; Jae Soo Kim; Ki Hak Moon; Kyung Seop Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-11-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.