Literature DB >> 15003150

Comparison of histologic grade between initial and follow-up biopsy in untreated, low to intermediate grade, localized prostate cancer.

R Choo1, V Do, L Sugar, L Klotz, E Bahk, E Hong, C Danjoux, G Morton, G DeBoer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the change of histologic grade of untreated, low to intermediate grade, clinically localized prostate cancer over time on repeat prostate biopsy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a prospective single-arm cohort study, patients were managed with observation alone unless they met pre-defined criteria of disease progression (PSA, clinical or histologic progression). Sixty-seven (54%) of a total of 123 eligible patients underwent follow-up prostate biopsy. Median time to the follow-up biopsy was 22 months (range: 7-60).
RESULTS: On the follow-up biopsy, Gleason score was unchanged in 20 patients (30%), upgraded in 19 (28%), and downgraded in 27 (40%). Twenty-one (31%) had no malignancy on the follow-up biopsy. Sixteen (37%) of 43 patients with < or = 2 positive cores on the initial biopsy had negative follow-up biopsy, while only 2 (11%) out of 18 with > or = 3 positive cores on the initial biopsy did. Five (7%) patients were upgraded to Gleason score 8. There was no correlation between the extent of grade change and baseline variables (age, clinical stage, and initial PSA) as well as PSA doubling time.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no consistent histologic upgrade on the follow-up biopsy at a median of 22 months in untreated, low to intermediate grade, clinically localized prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15003150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  5 in total

1.  Detection rate of clinically insignificant prostate cancer increases with repeat prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Bumsoo Park; Seong-Soo Jeon; Sung-Ho Ju; Byong-Chang Jeong; Seong-Il Seo; Hyun-Moo Lee; Han-Yong Choi
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  Current Management Strategy for Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jamil S Syed; Juan Javier-Desloges; Stephanie Tatzel; Ansh Bhagat; Kevin A Nguyen; Kevin Hwang; Sarah Kim; Preston C Sprenkle
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Prostate cancer: is inapparent tumor at endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging a favorable prognostic finding in patients who select active surveillance?

Authors:  Alvin R Cabrera; Fergus V Coakley; Antonio C Westphalen; Ying Lu; Shoujun Zhao; Katsuto Shinohara; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Coexistence of pernicious anemia and prostate cancer - 'an experiment of nature' involving vitamin B(12 )modulation of prostate cancer growth and metabolism: a case report.

Authors:  Glenn Tisman; Seth Kutik; Christa Rainville
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-11-24

5.  The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT) in Perspective.

Authors:  Jian Y Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2013-06-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.