Literature DB >> 14743467

Clinical and pathologic features of prostate cancer detected after repeat false-negative biopsy in a screening population.

Hannes Steiner1, Patrizia Moser, Martina Hager, Andreas P Berger, Helmut Klocker, Robert Spranger, Hermann Rogatsch, Georg Bartsch, Wolfgang Horninger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to investigate whether the clinical or pathologic features of prostate cancer (PCa) are related to the number of repeat biopsies required to establish the diagnosis of PCa.
METHODS: Between February 1993 and August 2000, 653 patients were evaluated in this retrospective study. All patients underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate prior to radical retropubic prostatectomy. The pathologic findings of specimens obtained at radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection as well as PSA levels, findings on DRE, prostate volumes, transition zone volumes, and age were analyzed separately for all PCa patients diagnosed at the first set of biopsies (group A) and compared with the data of those diagnosed at the 2nd-5th set of biopsies (group B). In a second step, we compared the results obtained from patients diagnosed at the 2nd set of biopsies (group B1) with those of patients diagnosed at the 3rd to 5th set of biopsies (group B2).
RESULTS: Gleason scores, pathologic tumor stages, and tumor volumes in group B were found to be significantly decreased compared to group A. But from the 2nd to 5th serial biopsy no further decrease in pathologic stage, Gleason score, or tumor volume was observed. On the contrary, there was a tendency towards higher tumor stages and Gleason scores. Of the tumors detected after the second false-negative set of biopsies almost 70% were lesions with Gleason scores of 6 or higher.
CONCLUSIONS: False-negative results at the first needle biopsy are predictive of a lower pathologic stage and grade as well as smaller tumor volumes of PCa diagnosed at repeat sets of biopsies. False-negative results on repeat biopsy, however, have no prognostic significance for the tumor stage of PCas detected at subsequent sets of biopsies. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14743467     DOI: 10.1002/pros.10330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  4 in total

1.  Detection rate of clinically insignificant prostate cancer increases with repeat prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Bumsoo Park; Seong-Soo Jeon; Sung-Ho Ju; Byong-Chang Jeong; Seong-Il Seo; Hyun-Moo Lee; Han-Yong Choi
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Increased rate of positive biopsies using a combination of MR-Tomography, spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging prior to prostate biopsies in patients with persistent elevated prostate-specific antigen values: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  A Lunacek; J Simon; R Bernt; M Huber; E Plas; C Mrstik
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2013-04

3.  Clinicopathologic differences between prostate cancers detected during initial and repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in Korea.

Authors:  Dong Jin Park; Ki Ho Kim; Tae Gwon Kwon; Chun Ii Kim; Cheol Hee Park; Jae Shin Park; Duck Youn Kim; Jae Soo Kim; Ki Hak Moon; Kyung Seop Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-11-10

4.  Characterization of prostate cancer detected at repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Takeshi Yuasa; Norihiko Tsuchiya; Teruaki Kumazawa; Takamitsu Inoue; Shintaro Narita; Mitsuru Saito; Yohei Horikawa; Shigeru Satoh; Tomonori Habuchi
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 2.264

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.