Literature DB >> 23274125

Can technical factors explain the volume-outcome relationship in gastric bypass surgery?

Mark D Smith1, Emma Patterson, Abdus S Wahed, Steven H Belle, Anita P Courcoulas, David Flum, Saurabh Khandelwal, James E Mitchell, Alfons Pomp, Walter J Pories, Bruce Wolfe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The existence of a relationship between surgeon volume and patient outcome has been reported for different complex surgical operations. This relationship has also been confirmed for patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study. Despite multiple studies demonstrating volume-outcome relationships, fewer studies investigate the causes of this relationship.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study is to understand possible explanations for the volume-outcome relationship in LABS.
METHODS: LABS includes a 10-center, prospective study examining 30-day outcomes after bariatric surgery. The relationship between surgeon annual RYGB volume and incidence of a composite endpoint (CE) has been published previously. Technical aspects of RYGB surgery were compared between high and low volume surgeons. The previously published model was adjusted for select technical factors.
RESULTS: High-volume surgeons (>100 RYGBs/yr) were more likely to perform a linear stapled gastrojejunostomy, use fibrin sealant, and place a drain at the gastrojejunostomy compared with low-volume surgeons (<25 RYGBs/yr), and less likely to perform an intraoperative leak test. After adjusting for the newly identified technical factors, the relative risk of CE was .93 per 10 RYGB/yr increase in volume, compared with .90 for clinical risk adjustment alone.
CONCLUSION: High-volume surgeons exhibited certain differences in technique compared with low-volume surgeons. After adjusting for these differences, the strength of the volume-outcome relationship previously found was reduced only slightly, suggesting that other factors are also involved.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; RYGB; Volume-outcome relationship

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23274125      PMCID: PMC3630240          DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  34 in total

1.  The relationship of surgeon and hospital volume to outcome after gastric bypass surgery in Pennsylvania: a 3-year summary.

Authors:  Anita Courcoulas; Matthew Schuchert; Guido Gatti; James Luketich
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Procedure incidence and in-hospital complication rates of bariatric surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Edward H Livingston
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Long-term outcomes after gastric bypass.

Authors:  Sarah White; Emma Brooks; Lydia Jurikova; Richard S Stubbs
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Bellal Joseph; John M Morton; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Ilan Rubinfeld; Chadi Faraj; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer.

Authors:  E Kuhry; H J Bonjer; E Haglind; W C J Hop; R Veldkamp; M A Cuesta; J Jeekel; L Påhlman; M Morino; A Lacy; S Delgado
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results and learning curve of a high-volume academic program.

Authors:  Scott A Shikora; Julie J Kim; Michael E Tarnoff; Elizabeth Raskin; Rebecca Shore
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-04

Review 7.  Gastric bypass.

Authors:  R E Brolin
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  The volume-outcomes effect in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: hospital versus surgeon contributions and specificity of the relationship.

Authors:  Hari Nathan; John L Cameron; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  The more the better?: the impact of surgeon and hospital volume on in-hospital mortality following colorectal resection.

Authors:  Paul J Karanicolas; Luc Dubois; Patrick H D Colquhoun; Carol J Swallow; Stephen D Walter; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Surgeon volume impacts hospital mortality for pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Robert W Eppsteiner; Nicholas G Csikesz; James T McPhee; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  3 in total

1.  Health Care Institutions Volume Is Significantly Associated with Postoperative Outcomes in Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Laurent Brunaud; Stephanie Polazzi; Jean-Christophe Lifante; Lea Pascal; David Nocca; Antoine Duclos
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  [Quality indicators for metabolic and bariatric surgery in Germany : Evidence-based development of an indicator panel for the quality of results, indications and structure].

Authors:  F Seyfried; H-J Buhr; C Klinger; T P Huettel; B Herbig; S Weiner; C Jurowich; A Dietrich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Fibrin Sealant: The Only Approved Hemostat, Sealant, and Adhesive-a Laboratory and Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  William D Spotnitz
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2014-03-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.