Literature DB >> 29209749

[Quality indicators for metabolic and bariatric surgery in Germany : Evidence-based development of an indicator panel for the quality of results, indications and structure].

F Seyfried1, H-J Buhr2, C Klinger2, T P Huettel3, B Herbig4, S Weiner5, C Jurowich6, A Dietrich7,8.   

Abstract

An expert committee was appointed by the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery to develop a panel of appropriate quality indicators to collate the quality of results, indications and structure in metabolic and bariatric surgery. This entailed assimilating the available evidence (systematic literature search), results from the national registry of the society (StuDoQ|MBE) and specific socioeconomic aspects (e. g. severely limited access to metabolic and bariatric surgery in Germany). These quality parameters were to be incorporated into the national guidelines and the rules of procedure for certification in the future. The committee concluded that mortality, MTL30 and severe complications needing intervention (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b) are suitable indicators to measure surgical outcome quality due to their relevance, scientific soundness and practicability. As a systematic follow-up is mandatory after bariatric surgery, a minimum follow-up quota is now required using reported quality of life data as an indicator of process quality. As intestinal bypass procedures have been shown to be superior in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, these procedures should be offered to eligible patients and also be performed. The proposed threshold values based on the results of the available literature and StuDoQ registry are to be considered as preliminary and need to be validated and adjusted if necessary in the future. The StuDoQ|MBE is considered a valuable tool to gather this information and also represents the appropriate infrastructure for the collation of relevant risk adjustors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aftercare; Bariatric surgery; Complications needing intervention; MTL30; Mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29209749     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-017-0563-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  122 in total

1.  Perioperative safety and volume: outcomes relationships in bariatric surgery: a study of 32,000 patients.

Authors:  Jon C Gould; K Craig Kent; Yin Wan; Victoria Rajamanickam; Glen Leverson; Guilherme M Campos
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  A 7-Year Clinical Audit of 1107 Cases Comparing Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass, and Mini-Gastric Bypass, to Determine an Effective and Safe Bariatric and Metabolic Procedure.

Authors:  Gurvinder S Jammu; Rajni Sharma
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with preexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease : a national analysis.

Authors:  Cecily E DuPree; Kelly Blair; Scott R Steele; Matthew J Martin
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes--3-year outcomes.

Authors:  Philip R Schauer; Deepak L Bhatt; John P Kirwan; Kathy Wolski; Stacy A Brethauer; Sankar D Navaneethan; Ali Aminian; Claire E Pothier; Esther S H Kim; Steven E Nissen; Sangeeta R Kashyap
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Assessment of postdischarge complications after bariatric surgery: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.

Authors:  Sophia Y Chen; Miloslawa Stem; Michael A Schweitzer; Thomas H Magnuson; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Five-year outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic duodenal switch in patients with body mass index of 50 to 60: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Hilde Risstad; Torgeir T Søvik; My Engström; Erlend T Aasheim; Morten W Fagerland; Monika Fagevik Olsén; Jon A Kristinsson; Carel W le Roux; Thomas Bøhmer; Kåre I Birkeland; Tom Mala; Torsten Olbers
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Weight loss, cardiovascular risk factors, and quality of life after gastric bypass and duodenal switch: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Torgeir T Søvik; Erlend T Aasheim; Osama Taha; My Engström; Morten W Fagerland; Sofia Björkman; Jon Kristinsson; Kare I Birkeland; Tom Mala; Torsten Olbers
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Is Sleeve Gastrectomy Always an Absolute Contraindication in Patients with Barrett's?

Authors:  Michel Gagner
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Risk factors associated with mortality after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  Peter Benotti; G Craig Wood; Deborah A Winegar; Anthony T Petrick; Christopher D Still; George Argyropoulos; Glenn S Gerhard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Similar postoperative safety between primary and revisional gastric bypass for failed gastric banding.

Authors:  Jérémie Thereaux; Nicolas Veyrie; Charles Barsamian; Nicola Corigliano; Alain Beauchet; Christine Poitou; Jean-Michel Oppert; Sebastien Czernichow; Jean-Luc Bouillot
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 14.766

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Barriers to the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) accreditation "Center for bariatric and metabolic surgery"].

Authors:  T Hasenberg; S Weiner; D Birk; E Bonrath
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  [Will laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy continue to exist as a stand-alone procedure? : A procedure critical perspective].

Authors:  A Dietrich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  [Bariatric surgery: Expectations and therapeutic goals-a contradiction?]

Authors:  I Hering; C Stier; F Seyfried
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [Evidence of the Mini-/One-anastomosis-gastric-Bypass for being a standard procedure in obesity and metabolic surgery].

Authors:  S Chiappetta; R Weiner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Safety of anastomoses in colorectal cancer surgery in octogenarians: a prospective cohort study with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Kai S Lehmann; Carsten Klinger; Johannes Diers; Heinz-Johannes Buhr; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Armin Wiegering
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-11-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.