Literature DB >> 19474684

The more the better?: the impact of surgeon and hospital volume on in-hospital mortality following colorectal resection.

Paul J Karanicolas1, Luc Dubois, Patrick H D Colquhoun, Carol J Swallow, Stephen D Walter, Gordon H Guyatt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the in-hospital mortality rates for patients undergoing colorectal resection for malignant or benign conditions, and to identify risk factors for in-hospital death, particularly the relationships with surgeon and hospital volume.
BACKGROUND: Although there is strong evidence that complex cancer operations are best performed at specialized high-volume centers and by high-volume surgeons, the relationship between surgeon and hospital volume and perioperative outcomes is less well defined for more common procedures such as colorectal resections, particularly for benign diseases.
METHODS: We obtained data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database on all adult patients who underwent colorectal resection between April 1, 2005 and March 31, 2006. We performed a logistic regression to identify variables associated with a higher likelihood of in-hospital death.
RESULTS: Twenty-one thousand seventy-four patients underwent colorectal resection, with the majority being elective (59.4%). Malignancy represented the most common indication for resection (56.8%), followed by diverticular disease (16.2%) and inflammatory bowel disease (7.1%). The overall in-hospital mortality rate among patients undergoing colorectal resection was 5.3%. Increased age (adjusted Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.97 per 10 years, P < 0.001), urgent operation (OR: 2.63, P < 0.001), indication for resection (P < 0.001), nature of the surgery (P < 0.001), and several comorbidities were all independently associated with an increased risk of death. Surgeons with higher volumes of colorectal resections achieved significantly lower mortality rates (OR: 0.92 per 20 cases/y, P = 0.003), corresponding to an adjusted mortality rate of 5.6% for surgeons in the bottom decile (1 case per year) compared with 4.5% for surgeons in the top decile (greater than 43 cases per year). Hospital volume was not associated with mortality (OR: 1.00 per 10 cases, P = 0.504).
CONCLUSIONS: This large, population-based study suggests that surgeons who perform high volumes of colorectal resections achieve lower in-hospital mortality rates than surgeons with low volumes, whereas the hospital volume does not influence mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19474684     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a77bcd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  31 in total

1.  MIS in the management of colon and rectal cancer: consensus meeting of the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada.

Authors:  Christopher M Schlachta; Shady Ashamalla; Andy Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Elective resection of colon cancer by high-volume surgeons is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Sebastien Drolet; Anthony R MacLean; Robert P Myers; Abdel Aziz M Shaheen; Elijah Dixon; W Donald Buie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The growing discrepancy between resident training in colonic surgery and the rising number of general surgery graduates.

Authors:  Samuel A Käser; Andreas Rickenbacher; Daniela Cabalzar-Wondberg; Marcel Schneider; Daniel Dietrich; Benjamin Misselwitz; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Matthias Turina
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Recent Advances in Diverticular Disease.

Authors:  Anne F Peery
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-07

5.  Real-world impact of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  A E Drohan; C M Hoogerboord; P M Johnson; G J Flowerdew; G A Porte
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein and white blood cell counts in the early detection of inflammatory complications after open resection of colorectal cancer: a retrospective study of 1,187 patients.

Authors:  Rene Warschkow; Ignazio Tarantino; Michael Torzewski; Franziska Näf; Jochen Lange; Thomas Steffen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  With widespread adoption of MIS colectomy for colon cancer, does hospital type matter?

Authors:  K Freischlag; M Adam; M Turner; J Watson; B Ezekian; P M Schroder; C Mantyh; J Migaly
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Complex and Reoperative Colorectal Surgery: Setting Expectations and Learning from Experience.

Authors:  Cindy Kin
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-06

9.  Annual case volume has no impact on patient outcomes in laparoscopic partial colectomy.

Authors:  Shaun C Daly; Matthew M Klairmont; Amanda B Francescatti; Jonathan A Myers; Daniel J Deziel; Minh B Luu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Mentoring and telementoring leads to effective incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery.

Authors:  Christopher M Schlachta; Kevin L Lefebvre; A Kent Sorsdahl; Shiva Jayaraman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.