Literature DB >> 22878970

Survival of short hip stems with a "modern", trochanter-sparing design - a systematic literature review.

Elke Rometsch1, Pieter K Bos, Bart W Koes.   

Abstract

Modern total hip arthroplasty delivers excellent and reproducible results. New implant developments include a wide range of implants with a bone and tissue sparing design, including short femoral stems. This review was performed to provide an overview on the currently published survival results of short stems to allow comparison with the results of traditional hip stems. A literature search was performed to identify publications on short stems with a "modern" trochanter sparing design including implant survival information. Information was collected on the study population, follow-up time, implants used, implant survival and functional scores. The revision rate per 100 observed component years was calculated and compared to data presented in national arthroplasty registries. The methodological quality was assessed by employing a score specific to survival assessment of hip stems. In the course of 16 individual searches in EMBASE and Medline, 460 potentially eligible articles were identified. After thorough screening, 14 articles were deemed applicable. The variability in quality of the publications was high. No association between survival outcome and publication quality was apparent. The total revision rate over all studies was found to be 0.38 per 100 component years with endpoint "stem revision for any reason". The survival rate of these stems is encouraging and appears to be comparable with that of more traditional uncemented stems. However, only few mid-term and long-term studies are available. Reports with longer follow-up are needed to draw further conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22878970     DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  21 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Mechanical and biological results of short-stem hip implants: consideration on a series of 74 cases.

Authors:  S Barreca; L Ciriaco; M Ferlazzo; M A Rosa
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-06-27

Review 3.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Bart Stuyts; Tom Vandenlangenbergh; Philippe Cartier; Peter Fennema
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Two- to 4-Year Followup of a Short Stem THA Construct: Excellent Fixation, Thigh Pain a Concern.

Authors:  Richard L Amendola; Devon D Goetz; Steve S Liu; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The influence of resection height on proximal femoral strain patterns after Metha short stem hip arthroplasty: an experimental study on composite femora.

Authors:  Thilo Floerkemeier; Jens Gronewold; Sebastian Berner; Gavin Olender; Christof Hurschler; Henning Windhagen; Gabriela von Lewinski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Clinical outcome of design modifications to the CLS Spotorno Stem in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Angelo Graceffa; Pier Francesco Indelli; Leonardo Latella; Paolo Poli; Alexander Fulco; Massimiliano Marcucci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-09-21

7.  Femoral neck preservation with a short hip stem produced with powder manufacturing: mid-term results of a consecutive case series.

Authors:  Marco Schiraldi; Manuel Bondi; Lodovico Renzi Brivio
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-01-28

8.  Long-term follow-up of 1217 consecutive short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA): a retrospective single-center experience.

Authors:  H Wacha; G Domsel; E Herrmann
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Comparison of tapered-wedge short and standard-length femoral stems in single-stage bilateral direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vahdet Uçan; Volkan Ezici; Orkhan Aliyev; Gökçer Uzer; İbrahim Tuncay; Fatih Yıldız
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Comparison of short-stem versus conventional stem for hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: 7-14 years follow-up.

Authors:  Arnaldo Sousa; João Vale; Sara Diniz; Pedro Neves; Joaquim Ramos; Rafaela Coelho
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.