Literature DB >> 16245310

Characterization of pathologic complete response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in carcinoma of the esophagus and outcome after pathologic complete response.

Pooja Rohatgi1, Stephen G Swisher, Arlene M Correa, Tsung-T Wu, Zhongxing Liao, Ritsuko Komaki, Garrett L Walsh, Ara A Vaporciyan, David C Rice, Jack A Roth, Jaffer A Ajani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to test the hypothesis that a lower clinical TNM stage is associated with a higher rate of pathologic complete response (pathCR) in patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy and to determine whether outcome after pathCR is related to clinical stage or treatment.
METHODS: Clinical parameters and surgical specimens of patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy were analyzed to identify predictors of pathCR. In patients with pathCR, predictors of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and distant recurrence were studied.
RESULTS: Sixty-nine (29%) of 235 patients achieved pathCR. In patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage II carcinoma, the proportion achieving pathCR was significantly larger than that achieving <pathCR (65% vs. 35%; P = 0.03). The proportion of patients who received induction chemotherapy was higher in the pathCR group than in the <pathCR group (54% vs. 46%; P = 0.05). However, neither TNM classification, primary tumor location, histologic type, gender, therapy sequence, or radiation dose (45 grays [Gy] vs. 50.4 Gy) were found to have any influence on OS or DFS. The median OS from pathCR was significantly longer than that from <pathCR (133 mos vs. 34 mos; P = 0.002). Similarly, DFS was longer in the pathCR group than in the <pathCR (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with clinical AJCC Stage II esophageal carcinoma are more likely to achieve a pathCR after preoperative chemoradiotherapy than are those with Stage III carcinoma. Chemoradiotherapy as primary therapy for patients with Stage I esophageal carcinoma warrants investigation as a means to preserve their esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16245310     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  38 in total

1.  The effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on pTNM staging and its prognostic significance in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Simon Law; Dora L W Kwong; Kam-Ho Wong; Ka-Fai Kwok; John Wong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  A phase II randomized trial of induction chemotherapy versus no induction chemotherapy followed by preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  J A Ajani; L Xiao; J A Roth; W L Hofstetter; G Walsh; R Komaki; Z Liao; D C Rice; A A Vaporciyan; D M Maru; J H Lee; M S Bhutani; A Eid; J C Yao; A P Phan; A Halpin; A Suzuki; T Taketa; P F Thall; S G Swisher
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  A nomogram that predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation also predicts survival outcomes after definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Steven H Lin; Jingya Wang; Pamela K Allen; Arlene M Correa; Dipen M Maru; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne L Hofstetter; Zhongxing Liao; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

4.  Radiation therapy in the postoperative management of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Salma K Jabbour; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2010-12

5.  Association of Aurora-A (STK15) kinase polymorphisms with clinical outcome of esophageal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Pan; Jaffer A Ajani; Jian Gu; Yubo Gong; Angel Qin; Angel Quin; Maosheng Hung; Xifeng Wu; Julie G Izzo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Non responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: why better prediction is necessary.

Authors:  Chantal M den Bakker; Justin K Smit; Anna M E Bruynzeel; Nicole C T van Grieken; Freek Daams; Sarah Derks; Miguel A Cuesta; John T M Plukker; Donald L van der Peet
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  ALDH-1 expression levels predict response or resistance to preoperative chemoradiation in resectable esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  J A Ajani; X Wang; S Song; A Suzuki; T Taketa; K Sudo; R Wadhwa; W L Hofstetter; R Komaki; D M Maru; J H Lee; M S Bhutani; B Weston; V Baladandayuthapani; Y Yao; S Honjo; A W Scott; H D Skinner; R L Johnson; D Berry
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery for esophageal cancer: does the pattern of recurrence differ for patients with complete response and those with partial or no response?

Authors:  Robert A Meguid; Craig M Hooker; Joshua T Taylor; Laurence R Kleinberg; Stephen M Cattaneo; Marc S Sussman; Stephen C Yang; Richard F Heitmiller; Arlene A Forastiere; Malcolm V Brock
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  18-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission computed tomography as predictive of response after chemoradiation in oesophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Elena Elimova; Xuemei Wang; Elba Etchebehere; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Roopma Wadhwa; Venkatram Planjery; Nikolaos Charalampakis; Mariela A Blum; Wayne Hofstetter; Jeff H Lee; Brian R Weston; Manoop S Bhutani; Jane E Rogers; Dipen Maru; Heath D Skinner; Homer A Macapinlac; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Mucosal endocrine cell micronests and single endocrine cells following neo-adjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Colin J R Stewart; Simon Hillery
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.