Literature DB >> 22395980

Prediction of response and prognosis by a score including only pretherapeutic parameters in 410 neoadjuvant treated gastric cancer patients.

Sylvie Lorenzen1, Susanne Blank, Florian Lordick, Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert, Katja Ott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor in locally advanced gastric cancer. However, no prospectively tested pretherapeutic parameters predicting response and/or survival in gastric cancer are available in clinical routine.
METHODS: We evaluated the prognostic significance of various clinical pathologic parameters in 410 patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy. Clinical and histopathologic response evaluation was performed by using standardized criteria. A prognostic score was created on the basis of the variables identified in the multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Three pretherapeutic parameters were identified as positive predictive factors for response and prognosis: tumor localization in the middle third of the stomach (P=0.001), well-differentiated tumors (P=0.001), and intestinal tumor type according to Laurén classification (P=0.03). A prognostic index was constructed, dividing the patients into three risk groups: low (n=73), intermediate (n=274), and high (n=63). The three groups had significantly different clinical (P=0.007) and histopathologic response rates (P=0.001) and survival times, with a median survival time that was not reached in the low-risk group, 39.2 months in the intermediate-risk group, and 20.5 months in the high-risk group. The corresponding 5-year survival rates were 65.3, 41.2, and 21.2% (P<0.001), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A simple scoring system based on three clinicopathologic parameters accurately predicts response and prognosis in neoadjuvant treated gastric cancer. This system provides additional useful information that could be applied to select gastric cancer patients pretherapeutically for different treatment approaches. Prospective testing of the score in an independent patient cohort is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22395980     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2254-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  23 in total

1.  Interim endoscopy results during neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer correlate with histopathological response and prognosis.

Authors:  Ulrike Heger; Franz Bader; Florian Lordick; Maria Burian; Rupert Langer; Martin Dobritz; Susanne Blank; Thomas Bruckner; Karen Becker; Ken Herrmann; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Katja Ott
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Different regimens of perioperative chemotherapy for esophagogastric and gastric adenocarcinoma: does a triplet therapy with taxane generate a survival benefit?

Authors:  Nicole Samm; Alexander Novotny; Helmut Friess; Daniel Reim
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-03-30

Review 3.  Role of imaging in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Robert Michael Kwee; Thomas Christian Kwee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Preoperative chemotherapy in gastric cancer: expanding the indications, limiting the overuse.

Authors:  Ferdinando C M Cananzi; Alberto Biondi; Luca Cozzaglio; Domenico D'Ugo; Roberto Persiani; Vittorio Quagliuolo
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 5.  Neo-adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy in gastric cancer: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Alberto Biondi; Maria C Lirosi; Domenico D'Ugo; Valeria Fico; Riccardo Ricci; Francesco Santullo; Antonia Rizzuto; Ferdinando Cm Cananzi; Roberto Persiani
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

6.  Preoperative therapy of esophagogastric cancer: the problem of nonresponding patients.

Authors:  S Blank; A Stange; L Sisic; W Roth; L Grenacher; F Sterzing; M Burian; D Jäger; M Büchler; K Ott
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  15-PGDH expression as a predictive factor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Min Hu; Kai Li; Ninu Maskey; Zhigao Xu; ChunWei Peng; Sufang Tian; Yan Li; Guifang Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 8.  What make differences in the outcome of adjuvant treatments for resected gastric cancer?

Authors:  Toshifusa Nakajima; Masashi Fujii
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Factors predicting prognosis and recurrence in patients with esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma and histopathological response with less than 10 % residual tumor.

Authors:  Katja Ott; Susanne Blank; Karen Becker; Rupert Langer; Wilko Weichert; Wilfried Roth; Leila Sisic; Annika Stange; Dirk Jäger; Markus Büchler; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Florian Lordick
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  International comparison of the German evidence-based S3-guidelines on the diagnosis and multimodal treatment of early and locally advanced gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus.

Authors:  Markus Moehler; Christoph T H Baltin; Matthias Ebert; Wolfgang Fischbach; Ines Gockel; Lars Grenacher; Arnulf H Hölscher; Florian Lordick; Peter Malfertheiner; Helmut Messmann; Hans-Joachim Meyer; Anne Palmqvist; Christoph Röcken; Christoph Schuhmacher; Michael Stahl; Martin Stuschke; Michael Vieth; Christian Wittekind; Dorothea Wagner; Stefan P Mönig
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 7.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.