| Literature DB >> 23268599 |
Adérito L Monjane1, Daniel Pande, Francisco Lakay, Dionne N Shepherd, Eric van der Walt, Pierre Lefeuvre, Jean-Michel Lett, Arvind Varsani, Edward P Rybicki, Darren P Martin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Single-stranded (ss) DNA viruses in the family Geminiviridae are proving to be very useful in real-time evolution studies. The high mutation rate of geminiviruses and other ssDNA viruses is somewhat mysterious in that their DNA genomes are replicated in host nuclei by high fidelity host polymerases. Although strand specific mutation biases observed in virus species from the geminivirus genus Mastrevirus indicate that the high mutation rates in viruses in this genus may be due to mutational processes that operate specifically on ssDNA, it is currently unknown whether viruses from other genera display similar strand specific mutation biases. Also, geminivirus genomes frequently recombine with one another and an alternative cause of their high mutation rates could be that the recombination process is either directly mutagenic or produces a selective environment in which the survival of mutants is favoured. To investigate whether there is an association between recombination and increased basal mutation rates or increased degrees of selection favoring the survival of mutations, we compared the mutation dynamics of the MSV-MatA and MSV-VW field isolates of Maize streak virus (MSV; Mastrevirus), with both a laboratory constructed MSV recombinant, and MSV recombinants closely resembling MSV-MatA. To determine whether strand specific mutation biases are a general characteristic of geminivirus evolution we compared mutation spectra arising during these MSV experiments with those arising during similar experiments involving the geminivirus Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (Begomovirus genus).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23268599 PMCID: PMC3556111 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Distribution of mutations in recombinant and wild-type MSV genomes. Under the name of each group of mutants (that is, VWMPCPLIRMat, MSV-MatA, MSV-VW, and the VWMPCPMat + MatMPCPVW and VWMPCPLIRMat + MatVMPCPLIRVW-derived recombinant MSV) the distribution of mutations is a composite of all the unique mutations identified in each population of viruses. Whereas the numbers that are written in italics and coloured in grey indicate sites where transversion mutations were detected, those in regular font and in black colour indicate sites where transition mutations were detected. These numbers are connected by vertical lines which refer to the mutated nucleotide of a specific virus listed in Additional file 7, and for simplicity we use the genomic co-ordinates of MSV-MatA to pinpoint the genomic position of each mutation. The lines are predominately drawn in black. However, those lines in red, blue or green indicate genomic positions (among at least a pair of viruses belonging to the different virus population groups) where identical mutations were detected. Those genomic sites where at least two viruses isolated from different plants have a particular convergent mutation are indicated using the symbols *, †, ‡ and §. At the bottom of the panels, MP (movement protein), CP (coat protein), SIR (short intergenic region), C2 + C1 (replication-associated proteins), and LIR (long intergenic region) delineate MSV open-reading frames and intergenic regions.
Step-down multiple testing corrected binomial probability support for strand-specific nucleotide mutation biases in MSV and TYLCV (Two-tailed probabilities in brackets)
| A → G : T → C | 2 : 2 | 2 : 1 | 4 : 0 | 1 : 1 | 9 : 4 | 16 : 6 | 8 : 22 |
| Binomial probability | 0.750 (1.000) | 1.000* (1.000*) | 0.252 (0.500) | 0.500 (1.000*) | 0.174 (0.801) | 0.054 (0.157) | 0.020 (0.064) |
| A → C : T → G | 2 : 0 | 1 : 1 | 3 : 1 | 0 : 5 | 6 : 6 | 11 : 10 | 10 : 12 |
| Binomial probability | 0.250 (1.000) | 1.000 (1.000*) | 0.500 (1.000*) | 0.124 (0.252) | 0.904 (1.000) | 0.168 (1.000) | 0.154 (0.832) |
| G → T : C → A | 8 : 2 | 3 : 1 | 1 : 2 | 1 : 2 | 13 : 7 | 29 : 9 | 46 : 30 |
| Binomial probability | 0.132 (0.436) | 1.000 (1.000*) | 0.375 (1.000) | 0.760 (1.000*) | 0.222 (0.526) | 0.004 (0.007) | 0.051 (0.254) |
| G → A : C → T | 4 : 11 | 1 : 3 | 3 : 6 | 5 : 6 | 13 : 26 | 18 : 30 | 48 : 55 |
| Binomial probability | 0.168 (0.354) | 1.000 (1.000*) | 0.492 (1.000*) | 0.675 (1.000*) | 0.060 (0.212) | 0.052 (0.222) | 0.124 (1.108) |
aRecombinant genomes obtained using the MatMPCPVW + VWMPCPMat and MatMPCPLIRVW + VWMPCPLIRMat parental chimaeric MSV genomes [47].
bData combined using values from this study only.
cData combined using values from this study and from van der Walt et al.[29].
dData obtained from Martin et al. [48]*The calculated step-down multiple tested corrected p-values greater than 1 are simply represented as having a p-value of 1.