BACKGROUND: The patient handoff process can be a highly variable and unstructured period at risk for communication errors. The morning sign-in process used by resident physicians at teaching hospitals typically involves less rigorous handoff protocols than the resident evening sign-out process. Little research has been conducted on best practices for handoffs during morning sign-in exchanges between resident physicians. Research must evaluate optimal protocols for the resident morning sign-in process. METHODS: Three morning handoff protocols consisting of written, electronic, and face-to-face methods were implemented over 3 study phases during an academic year. Study participants included all interns covering the internal medicine inpatient teaching service at a tertiary hospital. Study measures entailed intern survey-based interviews analyzed for failures in handoff protocols with or without missed pertinent information. Descriptive and comparative analyses examined study phase differences. RESULTS: A scheduled face-to-face handoff process had the fewest protocol deviations and demonstrated best communication of essential patient care information between cross-covering teams compared to written and electronic sign-in protocols. CONCLUSION: Intern patient handoffs were more reliable when the sign-in protocol included scheduled face-to-face meetings. This method provided the best communication of patient care information and allowed for open exchanges of information.
BACKGROUND: The patient handoff process can be a highly variable and unstructured period at risk for communication errors. The morning sign-in process used by resident physicians at teaching hospitals typically involves less rigorous handoff protocols than the resident evening sign-out process. Little research has been conducted on best practices for handoffs during morning sign-in exchanges between resident physicians. Research must evaluate optimal protocols for the resident morning sign-in process. METHODS: Three morning handoff protocols consisting of written, electronic, and face-to-face methods were implemented over 3 study phases during an academic year. Study participants included all interns covering the internal medicine inpatient teaching service at a tertiary hospital. Study measures entailed intern survey-based interviews analyzed for failures in handoff protocols with or without missed pertinent information. Descriptive and comparative analyses examined study phase differences. RESULTS: A scheduled face-to-face handoff process had the fewest protocol deviations and demonstrated best communication of essential patient care information between cross-covering teams compared to written and electronic sign-in protocols. CONCLUSION: Intern patient handoffs were more reliable when the sign-in protocol included scheduled face-to-face meetings. This method provided the best communication of patient care information and allowed for open exchanges of information.
Entities:
Keywords:
Communication errors; interns; patient handoffs; patient information; teaching hospital
Authors: Andrew A White; Seth W Wright; Roberto Blanco; Brent Lemonds; Janice Sisco; Sandy Bledsoe; Cindy Irwin; Jennifer Isenhour; James W Pichert Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Max V Wohlauer; Kyle O Rove; Thomas J Pshak; Christopher D Raeburn; Ernest E Moore; Chad Chenoweth; Apoorva Srivastava; Jonathan Pell; Randall B Meacham; Mark R Nehler Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2011-05-05 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Joshua Davis; Lee Ann Riesenberg; Matthew Mardis; John Donnelly; Branden Benningfield; Mallory Youngstrom; Imelda Vetter Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2015-06