BACKGROUND: There are presently no available therapeutic options for patients with peanut allergy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the safety, efficacy, and immunologic effects of peanut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). METHODS: After a baseline oral food challenge (OFC) of up to 2 g of peanut powder (approximately 50% protein; median successfully consumed dose [SCD], 46 mg), 40 subjects, aged 12 to 37 years (median, 15 years), were randomized 1:1 across 5 sites to daily peanut or placebo SLIT. A 5-g OFC was performed after 44 weeks, followed by unblinding; placebo-treated subjects then crossed over to higher dose peanut SLIT, followed by a subsequent crossover Week 44 5-g OFC. Week 44 OFCs from both groups were compared with baseline OFCs; subjects successfully consuming 5 g or at least 10-fold more peanut powder than the baseline OFC threshold were considered responders. RESULTS: After 44 weeks of SLIT, 14 (70%) of 20 subjects receiving peanut SLIT were responders compared with 3 (15%) of 20 subjects receiving placebo (P < .001). In peanut SLIT responders, median SCD increased from 3.5 to 496 mg. After 68 weeks of SLIT, median SCD significantly increased to 996 mg (compared with Week 44, P = .05). The median SCD at the Week 44 Crossover OFC was significantly higher than baseline (603 vs 71 mg, P = .02). Seven (44%) of 16 crossover subjects were responders; median SCD increased from 21 to 496 mg among responders. Of 10,855 peanut doses through the Week 44 OFCs, 63.1% were symptom free; excluding oral-pharyngeal symptoms, 95.2% were symptom free. CONCLUSIONS: Peanut SLIT safely induced a modest level of desensitization in a majority of subjects compared with placebo. Longer duration of therapy showed statistically significant increases in the SCD. Published by Mosby, Inc.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There are presently no available therapeutic options for patients with peanutallergy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the safety, efficacy, and immunologic effects of peanut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). METHODS: After a baseline oral food challenge (OFC) of up to 2 g of peanut powder (approximately 50% protein; median successfully consumed dose [SCD], 46 mg), 40 subjects, aged 12 to 37 years (median, 15 years), were randomized 1:1 across 5 sites to daily peanut or placebo SLIT. A 5-g OFC was performed after 44 weeks, followed by unblinding; placebo-treated subjects then crossed over to higher dose peanut SLIT, followed by a subsequent crossover Week 44 5-g OFC. Week 44 OFCs from both groups were compared with baseline OFCs; subjects successfully consuming 5 g or at least 10-fold more peanut powder than the baseline OFC threshold were considered responders. RESULTS: After 44 weeks of SLIT, 14 (70%) of 20 subjects receiving peanut SLIT were responders compared with 3 (15%) of 20 subjects receiving placebo (P < .001). In peanut SLIT responders, median SCD increased from 3.5 to 496 mg. After 68 weeks of SLIT, median SCD significantly increased to 996 mg (compared with Week 44, P = .05). The median SCD at the Week 44 Crossover OFC was significantly higher than baseline (603 vs 71 mg, P = .02). Seven (44%) of 16 crossover subjects were responders; median SCD increased from 21 to 496 mg among responders. Of 10,855 peanut doses through the Week 44 OFCs, 63.1% were symptom free; excluding oral-pharyngeal symptoms, 95.2% were symptom free. CONCLUSIONS:Peanut SLIT safely induced a modest level of desensitization in a majority of subjects compared with placebo. Longer duration of therapy showed statistically significant increases in the SCD. Published by Mosby, Inc.
Authors: Lara S Ford; Steve L Taylor; Robert Pacenza; Lynn M Niemann; Debra M Lambrecht; Scott H Sicherer Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Edwin H Kim; J Andrew Bird; Michael Kulis; Susan Laubach; Laurent Pons; Wayne Shreffler; Pamela Steele; Janet Kamilaris; Brian Vickery; A Wesley Burks Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: G W Scadding; M H Shamji; M R Jacobson; D I Lee; D Wilson; M T Lima; L Pitkin; C Pilette; K Nouri-Aria; S R Durham Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: Agnes Dechartres; Isabelle Boutron; Ludovic Trinquart; Pierre Charles; Philippe Ravaud Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: A Wesley Burks; Stacie M Jones; Robert A Wood; David M Fleischer; Scott H Sicherer; Robert W Lindblad; Donald Stablein; Alice K Henning; Brian P Vickery; Andrew H Liu; Amy M Scurlock; Wayne G Shreffler; Marshall Plaut; Hugh A Sampson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robyn E O'Hehir; Leanne M Gardner; Maria P de Leon; Belinda J Hales; Mark Biondo; Jo A Douglass; Jennifer M Rolland; Alessandra Sandrini Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Julie Wang; Stacie M Jones; Jacqueline A Pongracic; Ying Song; Nan Yang; Scott H Sicherer; Melanie M Makhija; Rachel G Robison; Erin Moshier; James Godbold; Hugh A Sampson; Xiu-Min Li Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 10.793