Literature DB >> 23264826

The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia.

Oliver Heidinger1, Wolf Ulrich Batzler, Volker Krieg, Stefanie Weigel, Cornelis Biesheuvel, Walter Heindel, Hans-Werner Hense.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer screening programs must meet high standards for quality and effectiveness, because many healthy persons need to be screened to detect relatively few cases of cancer. In this study, we use the rate of interval cancers as an important surrogate indicator for evaluating the German mammography screening program (MSP).
METHODS: All first-time participants in the MSP in the German federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia over the period 2005-2008 whose screening mammogram had been read as negative were followed over the next 24 months for the potential development of breast cancer (an "interval cancer" or IC). The screening data in the MSP database were compared in anonymized fashion with reports of cancer that were recorded at the Epidemiological Cancer Registry North Rhine-Westphalia.
RESULTS: Among the 878,764 women with negative screening mammograms in the first screening round, 2036 (23.2 per 10,000) developed an IC in the ensuing 24 months. These ICs accounted for 40% of all T2-T4 breast cancers occurring in first-time participants in the screening program in the 2 years after screening. The relative rate of IC compared to the background incidence of breast cancer before introduction of the MSP was 27% in the first year and 58% in the second. Screening detected 78% of all breast cancers that occurred during a maximum of 2 years after screening.
CONCLUSION: The IC rates in the implementation phase of the MSP agree with those found in other, established European programs. The present study is the first one to assess this important surrogate parameter to characterize the effectiveness of the German MSP among women in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany's largest state by population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23264826      PMCID: PMC3514772          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  13 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor: Hofvind S, Skaane P. Stage distribution of breast cancer diagnosed before and after implementation of population-based mammographic screening. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2012; 184: 437-442.

Authors:  M Kalager
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2012-07-31

2.  Mammography Screening: Evidence, History and Current Practice in Germany and Other European Countries.

Authors:  Cornelis Biesheuvel; Stefanie Weigel; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: time to tackle an underappreciated harm.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Methodological issues in international comparison of interval breast cancers.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Bulliard; Peter Sasieni; Carrie Klabunde; Jean-Pierre De Landtsheer; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Jacques Fracheboud
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].

Authors:  I Urbschat; J Kieschke; U Schlanstedt-Jahn; S von Gehlen; A Thiel; P Jensch
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2005-07

6.  A pooled analysis of interval cancer rates in six European countries.

Authors:  Sven Törnberg; Levent Kemetli; Nieves Ascunce; Solveig Hofvind; Ahti Anttila; Brigitte Sèradour; Eugenio Paci; Cathrine Guldenfels; Edward Azavedo; Alfonso Frigerio; Vitor Rodrigues; Antonio Ponti
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Pamela M Vacek; Joan Skelly; Donald L Weaver; Berta M Geller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Decline in hormone replacement prescription and fall in breast cancer incidence: an epidemiological discourse.

Authors:  Andreas Stang
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  [Planning, implementation and evaluation of cancer screening programs].

Authors:  Klaus Giersiepen; Hans-Werner Hense; Stefanie J Klug; Gerd Antes; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich       Date:  2007

Review 10.  Trends in hormone therapy and breast cancer incidence - results from the German Network of Cancer Registries.

Authors:  Alexander Katalinic; Anna Lemmer; Anette Zawinell; Rajesh Rawal; Annika Waldmann
Journal:  Pathobiology       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  21 in total

1.  German mammography screening program: quality assurance.

Authors:  Maria Blettner; Sylke Ruth Zeissig
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  In reply.

Authors:  Oliver Heidinger; Wolf Ulrich Batzler; Stefanie Weigel; Walter Heindel; Hans-Werner Hense
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Differentiation of breast cancers is missing.

Authors:  Gerhard Weth
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  [Mammography screening in Germany. Current results and future challenges].

Authors:  K Bock; S Heywang-Köbrunner; L Regitz-Jedermann; G Hecht; V Kääb-Sanyal
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density.

Authors:  Stefanie Weigel; W Heindel; J Heidrich; H-W Hense; O Heidinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Relevance of Health Economics in the Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Germany - the View of the Professional Association of Practicing Gynecologic Oncologists e.V. (BNGO).

Authors:  Christoph Uleer; Joachim Wagner; Christina Moisidis-Tesch
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Mammography Screening - as of 2013.

Authors:  S Heywang-Koebrunner; K Bock; W Heindel; G Hecht; L Regitz-Jedermann; A Hacker; V Kaeaeb-Sanyal
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Differences in Breast Cancer Characteristics by Mammography Screening Participation or Non-Participation.

Authors:  Bettina Braun; Laura Khil; Joke Tio; Barbara Krause-Bergmann; Andrea Fuhs; Oliver Heidinger; Hans-Werner Hense
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Implementation of the German Mammography Screening Program (German MSP) and First Results for Initial Examinations, 2005-2009.

Authors:  Daniela Malek; Vanessa Kääb-Sanyal
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  [Limits of mammography screening: current controversies and perspectives].

Authors:  K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.