Literature DB >> 24623009

[Mammography screening in Germany. Current results and future challenges].

K Bock1, S Heywang-Köbrunner, L Regitz-Jedermann, G Hecht, V Kääb-Sanyal.   

Abstract

The concept of mammography screening is based on the expectation that early diagnosis in a preclinical tumor stage enables less invasive treatment with a better prognosis than detection in advanced tumor stages. Mammography screening was implemented in European countries after results from large randomized controlled trials showed that regular screening led to a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality by 25-30 %. Recently, a major review of breast cancer screening services in Europe concluded that the benefits of screening clearly outweighed the disadvantages. In comparison to other European screening nations the German mammography screening program is relatively new. The challenge to prove the effectiveness by reduction in mortality still has to be solved. Continuous evaluation and optimization concerning the quality of structure, processes and results already confirm the high quality of the nationwide German screening services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24623009     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-013-2581-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  10 in total

Review 1.  Influence of study features and methods on overdiagnosis estimates in breast and prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Roman Gulati; Leslie Mallinger; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Overdiagnosis in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review.

Authors:  Donella Puliti; Stephen W Duffy; Guido Miccinesi; Harry de Koning; Elsebeth Lynge; Marco Zappa; Eugenio Paci
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 3.  Breast cancer mortality in mammographic screening in Europe: a review of incidence-based mortality studies.

Authors:  Sisse Njor; Lennarth Nyström; Sue Moss; Eugenio Paci; Mireille Broeders; Nereo Segnan; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Andriy I Bandos; Randi Gullien; Ellen B Eben; Ulrika Ekseth; Unni Haakenaasen; Mina Izadi; Ingvild N Jebsen; Gunnar Jahr; Mona Krager; Loren T Niklason; Solveig Hofvind; David Gur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A pooled analysis of interval cancer rates in six European countries.

Authors:  Sven Törnberg; Levent Kemetli; Nieves Ascunce; Solveig Hofvind; Ahti Anttila; Brigitte Sèradour; Eugenio Paci; Cathrine Guldenfels; Edward Azavedo; Alfonso Frigerio; Vitor Rodrigues; Antonio Ponti
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Kari Young; Arnulf Skjennald
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Arnulf Skjennald
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia.

Authors:  Oliver Heidinger; Wolf Ulrich Batzler; Volker Krieg; Stefanie Weigel; Cornelis Biesheuvel; Walter Heindel; Hans-Werner Hense
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 10.  Interpreting overdiagnosis estimates in population-based mammography screening.

Authors:  Rianne de Gelder; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Jacques Fracheboud; Gerrit Draisma; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography.

Authors:  Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Franziska Steudle; Daniel Paech; Anna Mlynarska; Tristan Anselm Kuder; Wolfgang Lederer; Heidi Daniel; Martin Freitag; Stefan Delorme; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Frederik Bernd Laun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.