Literature DB >> 23255073

Low percentage of KRAS mutations revealed by locked nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction: implications for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Mariella Dono1, Carlotta Massucco, Silvana Chiara, Claudia Sonaglio, Marco Mora, Anna Truini, Giannamaria Cerruti, Gabriele Zoppoli, Alberto Ballestrero, Mauro Truini, Manlio Ferrarini, Simona Zupo.   

Abstract

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is frequently characterized by the presence of mutations of the KRAS oncogene, which are generally associated with a poor response to treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies. With the methods currently used, a case is classified as KRAS-mutated when approximately 20% of the cells bear an activating KRAS mutation. These considerations raise the question of whether cells with a mutated KRAS can be found in mCRC cases classified as KRAS wild-type when more sensitive methods are used. In addition, the issue arises of whether these mCRC cases with low proportion of KRAS-mutated cells could account at least in part for the therapeutic failure of anti-EGFR therapies that occur in 40-60% of cases classified as KRAS wild type. In this study, we compared the classical assays with a very sensitive test, a locked nucleic acid (LNA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR), capable of detecting KRAS-mutated alleles at extremely low frequency (detection sensitivity limit 0.25% mutated DNA/wild-type DNA). By analyzing a cohort of 213 mCRC patients for KRAS mutations, we found a 20.6% discordance between the sequencing/TheraScreen methods and the LNA-PCR. Indeed, 44 mCRC patients initially considered KRAS wild type were reclassified as KRAS mutated by using the LNA-PCR test. These patients were more numerous among individuals displaying a clinical failure to anti-EGFR therapies. Failure to respond to these biological treatments occurred even in the absence of mutations in other EGFR pathway components such as BRAF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23255073      PMCID: PMC3576474          DOI: 10.2119/molmed.2012.00175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Med        ISSN: 1076-1551            Impact factor:   6.354


  31 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Recommended principles and practices for validating clinical molecular pathology tests.

Authors:  Lawrence Jennings; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Margaret L Gulley
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 3.  KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: proposal for an European quality assurance program.

Authors:  J H J M van Krieken; A Jung; T Kirchner; F Carneiro; R Seruca; F T Bosman; P Quirke; J F Fléjou; T Plato Hansen; G de Hertogh; P Jares; C Langner; G Hoefler; M Ligtenberg; D Tiniakos; S Tejpar; G Bevilacqua; A Ensari
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  KRAS p.G13D mutation and codon 12 mutations are not created equal in predicting clinical outcomes of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chen Mao; Ya-Fang Huang; Zu-Yao Yang; Da-Yong Zheng; Jin-Zhang Chen; Jin-Ling Tang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.

Authors:  W De Roock; H Piessevaux; J De Schutter; M Janssens; G De Hertogh; N Personeni; B Biesmans; J-L Van Laethem; M Peeters; Y Humblet; E Van Cutsem; S Tejpar
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Association of progression-free survival, overall survival, and patient-reported outcomes by skin toxicity and KRAS status in patients receiving panitumumab monotherapy.

Authors:  Marc Peeters; Salvatore Siena; Eric Van Cutsem; Alberto Sobrero; Alain Hendlisz; Stefano Cascinu; Haralabos Kalofonos; Giovanna Devercelli; Michael Wolf; Rafael G Amado
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Christos S Karapetis; Shirin Khambata-Ford; Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Dongsheng Tu; Niall C Tebbutt; R John Simes; Haji Chalchal; Jeremy D Shapiro; Sonia Robitaille; Timothy J Price; Lois Shepherd; Heather-Jane Au; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore; John R Zalcberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Carsten Bokemeyer; Igor Bondarenko; Anatoly Makhson; Joerg T Hartmann; Jorge Aparicio; Filippo de Braud; Serban Donea; Heinz Ludwig; Gunter Schuch; Christopher Stroh; Anja H Loos; Angela Zubel; Piotr Koralewski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; Erika Hitre; Jerzy Zaluski; Chung-Rong Chang Chien; Anatoly Makhson; Geert D'Haens; Tamás Pintér; Robert Lim; György Bodoky; Jae Kyung Roh; Gunnar Folprecht; Paul Ruff; Christopher Stroh; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Johannes Nippgen; Philippe Rougier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Federica Di Nicolantonio; Miriam Martini; Francesca Molinari; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Sabrina Arena; Piercarlo Saletti; Sara De Dosso; Luca Mazzucchelli; Milo Frattini; Salvatore Siena; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  The influence of subclonal resistance mutations on targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  Michael W Schmitt; Lawrence A Loeb; Jesse J Salk
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Expanded RAS: refining the patient population.

Authors:  Chloe E Atreya; Ryan B Corcoran; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Current companion diagnostics in advanced colorectal cancer; getting a bigger and better piece of the pie.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz; Kanwal P S Raghav
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

4.  Clinical Evaluation of IntelliPlex™ KRAS G12/13 Mutation Kit for Detection of KRAS Mutations in Codon 12 and 13: A Novel Multiplex Approach.

Authors:  Chi-Long Chen; Chi-Kuan Chen; Chung-Liang Ho; Wei-Ming Chi; Chien-Hsuan Yeh; Shian-Pin Hu; Peter Friebe; Stuart Palmer; Chin-Shiou Huang
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 5.  Consensus molecular subtypes and the evolution of precision medicine in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Dienstmann; Louis Vermeulen; Justin Guinney; Scott Kopetz; Sabine Tejpar; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Liquid biopsy for detection of actionable oncogenic mutations in human cancers and electric field induced release and measurement liquid biopsy (eLB).

Authors:  Michael Tu; David Chia; Fang Wei; David Wong
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.616

7.  Report from the OECI Oncology Days 2014.

Authors:  Wh van Harten; G Stanta; G Bussolati; P Riegman; G Hoefler; Kf Becker; G Folprecht; M Truini; J Haybaeck; R Buiga; M Dono; A Bagg; Ja López Guerrero; S Zupo; F Lemare; F de Lorenzo; N Goedbloed; D Razavi; J Lövey; Pa Cadariu; Ga Rollandi; F Paparo; M Pierotti; T Ciuleanu; P De Paoli; G Weiner; M Saghatchian; Claudio Lombardo
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2014-12-31

8.  Eprobe-mediated screening system for somatic mutations in the KRAS locus.

Authors:  Jun Atsumi; Takeshi Hanami; Yasuaki Enokida; Hiroomi Ogawa; Diane Delobel; Yasumasa Mitani; Yasumasa Kimura; Takahiro Soma; Michihira Tagami; Yoshiaki Takase; Tatsuo Ichihara; Izumi Takeyoshi; Kengo Usui; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Kimihiro Shimizu
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  Expanded Low Allele Frequency RAS and BRAF V600E Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer as Predictive Biomarkers for Cetuximab in the Randomized CO.17 Trial.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Anthony Dowers; Dongsheng Tu; Derek J Jonker; Daniel L Edelstein; Hannah Quinn; Frank Holtrup; Timothy Price; John R Zalcberg; Malcolm J Moore; Christos S Karapetis; Chris J O'Callaghan; Paul Waring; Hagen F Kennecke; Stanley R Hamilton; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 13.801

10.  Prediction of response to anti-EGFR antibody-based therapies by multigene sequencing in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Laura Lupini; Cristian Bassi; Jitka Mlcochova; Gentian Musa; Marta Russo; Petra Vychytilova-Faltejskova; Marek Svoboda; Silvia Sabbioni; Radim Nemecek; Ondrej Slaby; Massimo Negrini
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.