Literature DB >> 33087330

Expanded Low Allele Frequency RAS and BRAF V600E Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer as Predictive Biomarkers for Cetuximab in the Randomized CO.17 Trial.

Jonathan M Loree1, Anthony Dowers2, Dongsheng Tu3, Derek J Jonker4, Daniel L Edelstein5, Hannah Quinn5, Frank Holtrup5, Timothy Price6, John R Zalcberg7, Malcolm J Moore1, Christos S Karapetis8, Chris J O'Callaghan3, Paul Waring2, Hagen F Kennecke9, Stanley R Hamilton10, Scott Kopetz11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Expanded RAS/BRAF mutations have not been assessed as predictive for single-agent cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and low mutant allele frequency (MAF) mutations are of unclear significance. We aimed to establish cetuximab efficacy in optimally selected patients using highly sensitive beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics (BEAMing) analysis, capable of detecting alterations below standard clinical assays. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CO.17 trial compared cetuximab versus best supportive care (BSC) in RAS/BRAF-unselected mCRC. We performed RAS/BRAF analysis on microdissected tissue of 242 patients in CO.17 trial using BEAMing for KRAS/NRAS (codons 12/13/59/61/117/146) and BRAF V600E. Patients without BEAMing but with previous Sanger sequencing-detected mutations were included.
RESULTS: KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations were present in 53%, 4%, and 3% of tumors, respectively. Cetuximab improved overall survival [OS; HR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32-0.81; P = 0.004] and progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.15-0.41; P < 0.0001) compared with BSC in RAS/BRAF wild-type patients. Cetuximab did not improve OS/PFS for KRAS-, NRAS-, or BRAF-mutated tumors, and tests of interaction confirmed expanded KRAS (P = 0.0002) and NRAS (P = 0.006) as predictive, while BRAF mutations were not (P = 0.089). BEAMing identified 14% more tumors as RAS mutant than Sanger sequencing, and cetuximab lacked activity in these patients. Mutations at MAF < 5% were noted in 6 of 242 patients (2%). One patient with a KRAS A59T mutation (MAF = 2%) responded to cetuximab. More NRAS than KRAS mutations were low MAF (OR, 20.50; 95% CI, 3.88-96.85; P = 0.0038).
CONCLUSIONS: We establish single-agent cetuximab efficacy in optimally selected patients and show that subclonal RAS/BRAF alterations are uncommon and remain of indeterminate significance. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33087330      PMCID: PMC7785657          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  26 in total

1.  Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sandra Misale; Rona Yaeger; Sebastijan Hobor; Elisa Scala; Manickam Janakiraman; David Liska; Emanuele Valtorta; Roberta Schiavo; Michela Buscarino; Giulia Siravegna; Katia Bencardino; Andrea Cercek; Chin-Tung Chen; Silvio Veronese; Carlo Zanon; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Marcello Gambacorta; Margherita Gallicchio; Efsevia Vakiani; Valentina Boscaro; Enzo Medico; Martin Weiser; Salvatore Siena; Federica Di Nicolantonio; David Solit; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  BEAMing: single-molecule PCR on microparticles in water-in-oil emulsions.

Authors:  Frank Diehl; Meng Li; Yiping He; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Devin Dressman
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Prevalence of RAS mutations and individual variation patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A pooled analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  M Peeters; G Kafatos; A Taylor; V M Gastanaga; K S Oliner; G Hechmati; J-H Terwey; J H van Krieken
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Why a One Size Fits All Approach to RAS Might Not Fit Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 5.  Current companion diagnostics in advanced colorectal cancer; getting a bigger and better piece of the pie.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz; Kanwal P S Raghav
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

6.  Anti-EGFR-resistant clones decay exponentially after progression: implications for anti-EGFR re-challenge.

Authors:  C M Parseghian; J M Loree; V K Morris; X Liu; K K Clifton; S Napolitano; J T Henry; A A Pereira; E Vilar; B Johnson; B Kee; K Raghav; A Dasari; J Wu; N Garg; V M Raymond; K C Banks; A A Talasaz; R B Lanman; J H Strickler; D S Hong; R B Corcoran; M J Overman; S Kopetz
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Effect of low-frequency KRAS mutations on the response to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D Tougeron; T Lecomte; J C Pagès; C Villalva; C Collin; A Ferru; J M Tourani; C Silvain; P Levillain; L Karayan-Tapon
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Y Douillard; S Siena; J Cassidy; J Tabernero; R Burkes; M Barugel; Y Humblet; G Bodoky; D Cunningham; J Jassem; F Rivera; I Kocákova; P Ruff; M Błasińska-Morawiec; M Smakal; J L Canon; M Rother; K S Oliner; Y Tian; F Xu; R Sidhu
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  The relevance of primary tumour location in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of first-line clinical trials.

Authors:  Julian Walter Holch; Ingrid Ricard; Sebastian Stintzing; Dominik Paul Modest; Volker Heinemann
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Serial assessment of human tumor burdens in mice by the analysis of circulating DNA.

Authors:  Carlo Rago; David L Huso; Frank Diehl; Baktiar Karim; Guosheng Liu; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Yardena Samuels; Victor E Velculescu; Bert Vogelstein; Kenneth W Kinzler; Luis A Diaz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  6 in total

1.  A dual-targeted molecular therapy of PP242 and cetuximab plays an anti-tumor effect through EGFR downstream signaling pathways in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Linghui Kong; Qun Zhang; Jialei Mao; Lei Cheng; Xiao Shi; Lixia Yu; Jing Hu; Mi Yang; Li Li; Baorui Liu; Xiaoping Qian
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-08

2.  Encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: real-life data from an Italian multicenter experience.

Authors:  A Boccaccino; B Borelli; R Intini; M Antista; M Bensi; D Rossini; A Passardi; S Tamberi; R Giampieri; L Antonuzzo; L Noto; G Roviello; C Zichi; M Salati; A Puccini; C Noto; A Parisi; K Rihawi; M Persano; V Crespi; M Libertini; M Giordano; R Moretto; S Lonardi; C Cremolini
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 3.  Encorafenib plus cetuximab for the treatment of BRAF-V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Javier Ros; Nadia Saoudi; Iosune Baraibar; Francesc Salva; Josep Tabernero; Elena Elez
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.802

4.  Clinical and Functional Characterization of Atypical KRAS/NRAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Yucai Wang; Muddassir A Syed; Alexey V Sorokin; Oluwadara Coker; Joanne Xiu; Benjamin A Weinberg; Ari M Vanderwalde; Anteneh Tesfaye; Victoria M Raymond; Benjamin Miron; Gabi Tarcic; Ori Zelichov; Russell R Broaddus; Patrick Kwok Shing Ng; Kang Jin Jeong; Yiu Huen Tsang; Gordon B Mills; Michael J Overman; Axel Grothey; John L Marshall; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Tumor Biomarker Testing for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Canadian Consensus Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Irene S Yu; Francine Aubin; Rachel Goodwin; Jonathan M Loree; Cheryl Mather; Brandon S Sheffield; Stephanie Snow; Sharlene Gill
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 5.485

6.  Expression of Immuno-Oncologic Biomarkers Is Enriched in Colorectal Cancers and Other Solid Tumors Harboring the A59T Variant of KRAS.

Authors:  Emil Lou; Joanne Xiu; Yasmine Baca; Andrew C Nelson; Benjamin A Weinberg; Muhammad Shaalan Beg; Mohamed E Salem; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Philip Philip; Wafik S El-Deiry; W Michael Korn
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.