Literature DB >> 23254863

Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes using pedicle screw only constructs in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Steven W Hwang1, Amer F Samdani, Michelle Marks, Tracy Bastrom, Hitesh Garg, Baron Lonner, James T Bennett, Joshua Pahys, Suken Shah, Firoz Miyanji, Harry Shufflebarger, Peter Newton, Randal Betz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the mid-term clinical and radiographic impact of pedicle screw fixation in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
METHODS: A multicenter AIS database was retrospectively queried to identify 99 consecutive patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion using an all pedicle screw construct with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Radiographic and clinical parameters were reviewed at regular intervals up to 5 years.
RESULTS: The mean age was 14.4 ± 2.0 years with 79 % being female. The mean preoperative major curve was 51.7 ± 14.2° with a mean correction of 66 and 64 % at 2 and 5 years (p = 0.16). Pre-op thoracic kyphosis averaged 22.3 ± 12.9° and was 18.4 ± 10.6° at 5 years with no significant change from 2 years (p = 0.33). SRS total and domain scores demonstrated significant improvements at 2 years, which were slightly decreased at 5 years (p = 0.06). SRS scores of self-image (p = 0.99) and satisfaction (p = 0.18) were significantly improved after surgery with minimal change by 5 years. The change in SRS total scores from 2 to 5 years was attributed to differences in SRS scores of pain and mental health (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Intermediate follow-up of patients with AIS treated with an all pedicle screw construct demonstrates maintenance of their coronal, and sagittal plane correction between 2- and 5-year follow-up. At 5 years, improvements in SRS scores were consistent with 2-year values, except for a decline in pain and mental health scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23254863      PMCID: PMC3676554          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2625-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  34 in total

1.  Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Long-term functional and radiographic outcomes.

Authors:  Ilkka Helenius; Ville Remes; Timo Yrjönen; Mauno Ylikoski; Dietrich Schlenzka; Miia Helenius; Mikko Poussa
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Comparative analysis of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.

Authors:  U Liljenqvist; U Lepsien; L Hackenberg; T Niemeyer; H Halm
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Computer tomography evaluation of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M L Ecker; R R Betz; P S Trent; S Mahboubi; M Mesgarzadeh; A Bonakdapour; D S Drummond; M Clancy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Effect of direct vertebral body derotation on the sagittal profile in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Steven W Hwang; Amer F Samdani; Loyola V Gressot; Kyle Hubler; Michelle C Marks; Tracey P Bastrom; Randal R Betz; Patrick J Cahill
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Rotational changes of the vertebral-pelvic axis following Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation.

Authors:  K B Wood; E E Transfeldt; J W Ogilvie; M J Schendel; D S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Internal thoracoplasty. A new procedure.

Authors:  H L Shufflebarger; K Smiley; H J Roth
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Outcome of Wisconsin instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  C L Jeng; P D Sponseller; V T Tolo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The rib deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective study to evaluate changes after Harrington distraction and posterior fusion.

Authors:  C R Weatherley; V Draycott; J F O'Brien; D R Benson; K C Gopalakrishnan; J H Evans; J P O'Brien
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-03

9.  Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion.

Authors:  T Cochran; L Irstam; A Nachemson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Current concepts and management of patients with fixed decompensated spinal deformity.

Authors:  D S Bradford; C B Tribus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  11 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using high-density pedicle screw constructs: Is 5-year routine visit required?

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Rodrigo Remondino; J Joncas; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Skipped versus consecutive pedicle screw constructs for correction of Lenke 1 curves.

Authors:  Simon Morr; Alexandra Carrer; Luis Ignacio Alvarez-García de Quesada; Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Olaverri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Titanium vs cobalt chromium: what is the best rod material to enhance adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction with sublaminar bands?

Authors:  Audrey Angelliaume; E Ferrero; K Mazda; M Le Hanneur; F Accabled; J Sales de Gauzy; B Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  CoCr rods provide better frontal correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by all-pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Mayalen Lamerain; Manon Bachy; Marion Delpont; Reda Kabbaj; Pierre Mary; Raphaël Vialle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effect of surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on the quality of life: a prospective study with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Massimo Mariconda; Claudia Andolfi; Simone Cerbasi; Valeria Servodidio
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Efficacy of Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering in Skeletally Mature Children with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Sajan K Hegde; Muralidharan Venkatesan; Keyur Kantilal Akbari; Vigneshwara M Badikillaya
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

7.  Instrumentation complication rates following spine surgery: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) morbidity and mortality database.

Authors:  Jamal N Shillingford; Joseph L Laratta; Nana O Sarpong; Rami G Alrabaa; Meghan K Cerpa; Ronald A Lehman; Lawrence G Lenke; Charla R Fischer
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-03

8.  Preservation of Spine Motion in the Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using an Innovative Apical Fusion Technique: A 2-Year Follow-Up Pilot Study.

Authors:  Pooria Hosseini; Allen Carl; Michael Grevitt; Colin Nnadi; Martin Repko; Dennis G Crandall; Ufuk Aydinli; Ľuboš Rehák; Martin Zabka; Steven Seme; Behrooz A Akbarnia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-31

9.  Reproducibility of thoracic kyphosis measurements in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Søren Ohrt-Nissen; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Dennis Winge Hallager; Martin Gehrchen; Kenny Kwan; Benny Dahl; Kenneth M C Cheung; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-02-21

10.  Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Sohail Rafi; Naseem Munshi; Asad Abbas; Rabia Hassan Shaikh; Imtiaz Hashmi
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.