Literature DB >> 23248308

Joint analysis of stressors and ecosystem services to enhance restoration effectiveness.

J David Allan1, Peter B McIntyre, Sigrid D P Smith, Benjamin S Halpern, Gregory L Boyer, Andy Buchsbaum, G A Burton, Linda M Campbell, W Lindsay Chadderton, Jan J H Ciborowski, Patrick J Doran, Tim Eder, Dana M Infante, Lucinda B Johnson, Christine A Joseph, Adrienne L Marino, Alexander Prusevich, Jennifer G Read, Joan B Rose, Edward S Rutherford, Scott P Sowa, Alan D Steinman.   

Abstract

With increasing pressure placed on natural systems by growing human populations, both scientists and resource managers need a better understanding of the relationships between cumulative stress from human activities and valued ecosystem services. Societies often seek to mitigate threats to these services through large-scale, costly restoration projects, such as the over one billion dollar Great Lakes Restoration Initiative currently underway. To help inform these efforts, we merged high-resolution spatial analyses of environmental stressors with mapping of ecosystem services for all five Great Lakes. Cumulative ecosystem stress is highest in near-shore habitats, but also extends offshore in Lakes Erie, Ontario, and Michigan. Variation in cumulative stress is driven largely by spatial concordance among multiple stressors, indicating the importance of considering all stressors when planning restoration activities. In addition, highly stressed areas reflect numerous different combinations of stressors rather than a single suite of problems, suggesting that a detailed understanding of the stressors needing alleviation could improve restoration planning. We also find that many important areas for fisheries and recreation are subject to high stress, indicating that ecosystem degradation could be threatening key services. Current restoration efforts have targeted high-stress sites almost exclusively, but generally without knowledge of the full range of stressors affecting these locations or differences among sites in service provisioning. Our results demonstrate that joint spatial analysis of stressors and ecosystem services can provide a critical foundation for maximizing social and ecological benefits from restoration investments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23248308      PMCID: PMC3538252          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213841110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

1.  Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses.

Authors:  Crow White; Benjamin S Halpern; Carrie V Kappel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Policies and practices of beach monitoring in the Great Lakes, USA: a critical review.

Authors:  Meredith B Nevers; Richard L Whitman
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2010-01-06

3.  A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems.

Authors:  Benjamin S Halpern; Shaun Walbridge; Kimberly A Selkoe; Carrie V Kappel; Fiorenza Micheli; Caterina D'Agrosa; John F Bruno; Kenneth S Casey; Colin Ebert; Helen E Fox; Rod Fujita; Dennis Heinemann; Hunter S Lenihan; Elizabeth M P Madin; Matthew T Perry; Elizabeth R Selig; Mark Spalding; Robert Steneck; Reg Watson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Quantifying the evidence for ecological synergies.

Authors:  Emily S Darling; Isabelle M Côté
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 5.  Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities.

Authors:  James M Bullock; James Aronson; Adrian C Newton; Richard F Pywell; Jose M Rey-Benayas
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity.

Authors:  C J Vörösmarty; P B McIntyre; M O Gessner; D Dudgeon; A Prusevich; P Green; S Glidden; S E Bunn; C A Sullivan; C Reidy Liermann; P M Davies
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems.

Authors:  Caitlin Mullan Crain; Kristy Kroeker; Benjamin S Halpern
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 9.492

  7 in total
  35 in total

1.  Long-term change of total suspended matter in a deep-valley reservoir with HJ-1A/B: implications for reservoir management.

Authors:  Yibo Zhang; Kun Shi; Yunlin Zhang; Max J Moreno-Madriñán; Guangwei Zhu; Yongqiang Zhou; Xiaolong Yao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Incorporating threat in hotspots and coldspots of biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Authors:  Matthias Schröter; Roland Kraemer; Silvia Ceauşu; Graciela M Rusch
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes.

Authors:  Alan D Steinman; Bradley J Cardinale; Wayne R Munns; Mary E Ogdahl; J David Allan; Ted Angadi; Sarah Bartlett; Kate Brauman; Muruleedhara Byappanahalli; Matt Doss; Diane Dupont; Annie Johns; Donna Kashian; Frank Lupi; Peter McIntyre; Todd Miller; Michael Moore; Rebecca Logsdon Muenich; Rajendra Poudel; James Price; Bill Provencher; Anne Rea; Jennifer Read; Steven Renzetti; Brent Sohngen; Erika Washburn
Journal:  J Great Lakes Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Transforming ecosystems: When, where, and how to restore contaminated sites.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Aïda M Farag; Marc W Cadotte; William H Clements; James R Smith; Cheryl P Ulrich; Richard Woods
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.992

5.  Effect of ecological restoration and climate change on ecosystems: a case study in the Three-Rivers Headwater Region, China.

Authors:  Chong Jiang; Linbo Zhang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Midwestern US Farmers Perceive Crop Advisers as Conduits of Information on Agricultural Conservation Practices.

Authors:  Francis R Eanes; Ajay S Singh; Brian R Bulla; Pranay Ranjan; Linda S Prokopy; Mary Fales; Benjamin Wickerham; Patrick J Doran
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Six decades of Lake Ontario ecological history according to benthos.

Authors:  Lyubov E Burlakova; Alexander Y Karatayev; Allison R Hrycik; Susan E Daniel; Knut Mehler; Lars G Rudstam; James M Watkins; Ronald Dermott; Jill Scharold; Ashley K Elgin; Thomas Nalepa
Journal:  J Great Lakes Res       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 3.032

8.  A Framework for Aquatic Invasive Species Surveillance Site Selection and Prioritization in the US waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes.

Authors:  Andrew J Tucker; W Lindsay Chadderton; Gust Annis; Alisha D Davidson; Jon Bossenbroek; Stephen Hensler; Michael Hoff; Joel Hoffman; Erika Jensen; Donna Kashian; Sarah LeSage; Timothy Strakosh
Journal:  Manag Biol Invasion       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.282

9.  Outsized nutrient contributions from small tributaries to a Great Lake.

Authors:  Robert J Mooney; Emily H Stanley; William C Rosenthal; Peter C Esselman; Anthony D Kendall; Peter B McIntyre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Examining historical mercury sources in the Saint Louis River estuary: How legacy contamination influences biological mercury levels in Great Lakes coastal regions.

Authors:  Sarah E Janssen; Joel C Hoffman; Ryan F Lepak; David P Krabbenhoft; David Walters; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Greg Peterson; Jacob M Ogorek; John F DeWild; Anne Cotter; Mark Pearson; Michael T Tate; Roger B Yeardley; Marc A Mills
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 10.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.