Literature DB >> 21782273

Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities.

James M Bullock1, James Aronson, Adrian C Newton, Richard F Pywell, Jose M Rey-Benayas.   

Abstract

Ecological restoration is becoming regarded as a major strategy for increasing the provision of ecosystem services as well as reversing biodiversity losses. Here, we show that restoration projects can be effective in enhancing both, but that conflicts can arise, especially if single services are targeted in isolation. Furthermore, recovery of biodiversity and services can be slow and incomplete. Despite this uncertainty, new methods of ecosystem service valuation are suggesting that the economic benefits of restoration can outweigh costs. Payment for Ecosystem Service schemes could therefore provide incentives for restoration, but require development to ensure biodiversity and multiple services are enhanced and the needs of different stakeholders are met. Such approaches must be implemented widely if new global restoration targets are to be achieved.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21782273     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  57 in total

1.  Effects of Re-vegetation on Herbaceous Species Composition and Biological Soil Crusts Development in a Coal Mine Dumping Site.

Authors:  Yang Zhao; Peng Zhang; Yigang Hu; Lei Huang
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Healing the wounds in the landscape-reclaiming gravel roads in conservation areas.

Authors:  Oili Tarvainen; Anne Tolvanen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Restoring forest landscapes: important lessons learnt.

Authors:  Stephanie Mansourian; Daniel Vallauri
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Protected area certificates: gaining ground for better ecosystem protection?

Authors:  Anna Segerstedt; Ulrike Grote
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Avian functional responses to landscape recovery.

Authors:  Karen Ikin; Philip S Barton; Wade Blanchard; Mason Crane; John Stein; David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Risks and opportunities of trophic rewilding for arthropod communities.

Authors:  Roel van Klink; Michiel F WallisDeVries
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Transforming ecosystems: When, where, and how to restore contaminated sites.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Aïda M Farag; Marc W Cadotte; William H Clements; James R Smith; Cheryl P Ulrich; Richard Woods
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.992

8.  Joint analysis of stressors and ecosystem services to enhance restoration effectiveness.

Authors:  J David Allan; Peter B McIntyre; Sigrid D P Smith; Benjamin S Halpern; Gregory L Boyer; Andy Buchsbaum; G A Burton; Linda M Campbell; W Lindsay Chadderton; Jan J H Ciborowski; Patrick J Doran; Tim Eder; Dana M Infante; Lucinda B Johnson; Christine A Joseph; Adrienne L Marino; Alexander Prusevich; Jennifer G Read; Joan B Rose; Edward S Rutherford; Scott P Sowa; Alan D Steinman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Emergy-based evaluation of system sustainability and ecosystem value of a large-scale constructed wetland in North China.

Authors:  Yiran Zhang; Jian Liu; Jian Zhang; Renqing Wang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Impact of perceived importance of ecosystem services and stated financial constraints on willingness to pay for riparian meadow restoration in Flanders (Belgium).

Authors:  Wendy Y Chen; Joris Aertsens; Inge Liekens; Steven Broekx; Leo De Nocker
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.