Literature DB >> 36072892

A Framework for Aquatic Invasive Species Surveillance Site Selection and Prioritization in the US waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes.

Andrew J Tucker1, W Lindsay Chadderton1, Gust Annis2, Alisha D Davidson3, Jon Bossenbroek4, Stephen Hensler5,6, Michael Hoff7, Joel Hoffman8, Erika Jensen9, Donna Kashian3, Sarah LeSage10, Timothy Strakosh11.   

Abstract

Risk-based prioritization for early detection monitoring is of utmost importance to prevent and mitigate invasive species impacts. The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, a binational commitment between the United States and Canada to restore and protect the waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes, identifies aquatic invasive species (AIS) as one of ten priority issues (annexes) that must be addressed to ensure the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Great Lakes. The Agreement calls out the need for a comprehensive strategy for detecting and tracking new and potentially invasive species. Yet, with a surface water area of 95, 000 square miles (246, 049 square km) and shoreline length of 10, 210 miles (16, 431 km), the Great Lakes represent a daunting challenge for prioritizing where AIS surveillance activities should occur. Our goal was to develop a spatially-explicit and quantitative approach for identifying the highest risk sites for AIS introduction into the US waters of the Great Lakes based on the cumulative risk of new introductions (including range expansions) from a range of pathways and associated taxa. We estimate "invasion risk" scores for nearly 6,000 sites (9 km x 9 km) across the Great Lakes basin using proxy measures for propagule pressure weighted by the proportion of taxa associated with each proxy variable. Proxy variables include human population, number of ship visits, marina size, number of ponds, and number of natural or artificial aquatic connections. In total, we identify more than 1,800 sites with invasion risk scores >0. A small subset of these 1,800+ sites accounts for a majority of predicted propagule pressure and are therefore logical targets for future surveillance and AIS prevention efforts. Many of the highest risk sites are located in western Lake Erie, southern Lake Michigan, and the St. Clair-Detroit River System.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aquatic invasive species; risk assessment; surveillance

Year:  2020        PMID: 36072892      PMCID: PMC9447411          DOI: 10.3391/mbi.2020.11.3.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Manag Biol Invasion        ISSN: 1989-8649            Impact factor:   2.282


  15 in total

1.  Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management.

Authors:  David M Lodge; Susan Williams; Hugh J MacIsaac; Keith R Hayes; Brian Leung; Sarah Reichard; Richard N Mack; Peter B Moyle; Maggie Smith; David A Andow; James T Carlton; Anthony McMichael
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  Evaluating efficacy of an environmental policy to prevent biological invasions.

Authors:  Sarah A Bailey; Matthew G Deneau; Laurent Jean; Chris J Wiley; Brian Leung; Hugh J MacIsaac
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Pathways and places associated with nonindigenous aquatic species introductions in the Laurentian Great Lakes.

Authors:  Elon M O'Malia; Lucinda B Johnson; Joel C Hoffman
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  Brachionus leydigii (Monogononta: Ploima) reported from the western basin of Lake Erie.

Authors:  J K Connolly; J M Watkins; C C Marshall; J M Adams; L G Rudstam; L A Błędzki
Journal:  J Great Lakes Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  Joint analysis of stressors and ecosystem services to enhance restoration effectiveness.

Authors:  J David Allan; Peter B McIntyre; Sigrid D P Smith; Benjamin S Halpern; Gregory L Boyer; Andy Buchsbaum; G A Burton; Linda M Campbell; W Lindsay Chadderton; Jan J H Ciborowski; Patrick J Doran; Tim Eder; Dana M Infante; Lucinda B Johnson; Christine A Joseph; Adrienne L Marino; Alexander Prusevich; Jennifer G Read; Joan B Rose; Edward S Rutherford; Scott P Sowa; Alan D Steinman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The Asian cyclopoid copepod Mesocyclops pehpeiensis reported from the western basin of Lake Erie.

Authors:  Joseph Connolly; James M Watkins; Elizabeth K Hinchey; Lars G Rudstam; Janet W Reid
Journal:  J Great Lakes Res       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  First record of the Neotropical cladoceran Diaphanosoma fluviatile in the Great Lakes basin.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Whitmore; Joseph K Connolly; Kay Van Damme; James M Watkins; Elizabeth K Hinchey; Lars G Rudstam
Journal:  Bioinvasions Rec       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.672

8.  A spatial modeling approach to predicting the secondary spread of invasive species due to ballast water discharge.

Authors:  Jennifer L Sieracki; Jonathan M Bossenbroek; W Lindsay Chadderton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessing threats of non-native species to native freshwater biodiversity: Conservation priorities for the United States.

Authors:  Stephanie Panlasigui; Amy J S Davis; Michael J Mangiante; John A Darling
Journal:  Biol Conserv       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.990

10.  Recreational freshwater fishing drives non-native aquatic species richness patterns at a continental scale.

Authors:  A J S Davis; J A Darling
Journal:  Divers Distrib       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.139

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Framework for Aquatic Invasive Species Surveillance Site Selection and Prioritization in the US waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes.

Authors:  Andrew J Tucker; W Lindsay Chadderton; Gust Annis; Alisha D Davidson; Jon Bossenbroek; Stephen Hensler; Michael Hoff; Joel Hoffman; Erika Jensen; Donna Kashian; Sarah LeSage; Timothy Strakosh
Journal:  Manag Biol Invasion       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.282

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.