Literature DB >> 28503701

Incorporating threat in hotspots and coldspots of biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Matthias Schröter1,2, Roland Kraemer3,4, Silvia Ceauşu4,5, Graciela M Rusch6.   

Abstract

Spatial prioritization could help target conservation actions directed to maintain both biodiversity and ecosystem services. We delineate hotspots and coldspots of two biodiversity conservation features and five regulating and cultural services by incorporating an indicator of 'threat', i.e. timber harvest profitability for forest areas in Telemark (Norway). We found hotspots, where high values of biodiversity, ecosystem services and threat coincide, ranging from 0.1 to 7.1% of the area, depending on varying threshold levels. Targeting of these areas for conservation follows reactive conservation approaches. In coldspots, high biodiversity and ecosystem service values coincide with low levels of threat, and cover 0.1-3.4% of the forest area. These areas might serve proactive conservation approaches at lower opportunity cost (foregone timber harvest profits). We conclude that a combination of indicators of biodiversity, ecosystem services and potential threat is an appropriate approach for spatial prioritization of proactive and reactive conservation strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon sequestration; Carbon storage; Conservation management; Existence value; Recreation; Spatial priority setting

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28503701      PMCID: PMC5622886          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-017-0922-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  19 in total

1.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

Authors:  N Myers; R A Mittermeier; C G Mittermeier; G A da Fonseca; J Kent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The biodiversity challenge: expanded hot-spots analysis.

Authors:  N Myers
Journal:  Environmentalist       Date:  1990

3.  Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat.

Authors:  C David L Orme; Richard G Davies; Malcolm Burgess; Felix Eigenbrod; Nicola Pickup; Valerie A Olson; Andrea J Webster; Tzung-Su Ding; Pamela C Rasmussen; Robert S Ridgely; Ali J Stattersfield; Peter M Bennett; Tim M Blackburn; Kevin J Gaston; Ian P F Owens
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Integrating economic costs into conservation planning.

Authors:  Robin Naidoo; Andrew Balmford; Paul J Ferraro; Stephen Polasky; Taylor H Ricketts; Mathieu Rouget
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 5.  Towards a Threat Assessment Framework for Ecosystem Services.

Authors:  Martine Maron; Matthew G E Mitchell; Rebecca K Runting; Jonathan R Rhodes; Georgina M Mace; David A Keith; James E M Watson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  A framework for identifying carbon hotspots and forest management drivers.

Authors:  Nilesh Timilsina; Francisco J Escobedo; Wendell P Cropper; Amr Abd-Elrahman; Thomas J Brandeis; Sonia Delphin; Samuel Lambert
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 6.789

7.  Joint analysis of stressors and ecosystem services to enhance restoration effectiveness.

Authors:  J David Allan; Peter B McIntyre; Sigrid D P Smith; Benjamin S Halpern; Gregory L Boyer; Andy Buchsbaum; G A Burton; Linda M Campbell; W Lindsay Chadderton; Jan J H Ciborowski; Patrick J Doran; Tim Eder; Dana M Infante; Lucinda B Johnson; Christine A Joseph; Adrienne L Marino; Alexander Prusevich; Jennifer G Read; Joan B Rose; Edward S Rutherford; Scott P Sowa; Alan D Steinman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Uncertainties in ecosystem service maps: a comparison on the European scale.

Authors:  Catharina J E Schulp; Benjamin Burkhard; Joachim Maes; Jasper Van Vliet; Peter H Verburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity.

Authors:  Matthias Schröter; Graciela M Rusch; David N Barton; Stefan Blumentrath; Björn Nordén
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An empirical assessment and comparison of species-based and habitat-based surrogates: a case study of forest vertebrates and large old trees.

Authors:  David B Lindenmayer; Philip S Barton; Peter W Lane; Martin J Westgate; Lachlan McBurney; David Blair; Philip Gibbons; Gene E Likens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Where are the hotspots and coldspots of landscape values, visitor use and biodiversity in an urban forest?

Authors:  Silviya Korpilo; Joel Jalkanen; Tarmo Virtanen; Susanna Lehvävirta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Spatial analyses of threats to ecosystem service hotspots in Greater Durban, South Africa.

Authors:  Rashieda Davids; Mathieu Rouget; Richard Boon; Debra Roberts
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Prioritizing actions: spatial action maps for conservation.

Authors:  Heather Tallis; Joe Fargione; Edward Game; Rob McDonald; Leandro Baumgarten; Nirmal Bhagabati; Rane Cortez; Bronson Griscom; Jonathan Higgins; Christina M Kennedy; Joe Kiesecker; Timm Kroeger; Trina Leberer; Jennifer McGowan; Lisa Mandle; Yuta J Masuda; Scott A Morrison; Sally Palmer; Rebecca Shirer; Priya Shyamsundar; Nicholas H Wolff; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 6.499

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.