Literature DB >> 23246088

Efficient separation of oxidized cello-oligosaccharides generated by cellulose degrading lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases.

Bjørge Westereng1, Jane Wittrup Agger, Svein J Horn, Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad, Finn L Aachmann, Yngve H Stenstrøm, Vincent G H Eijsink.   

Abstract

We present an evaluation of HPLC-based analytical tools for the simultaneous analysis of native and oxidized cello-oligosaccharides, which are products of enzymatic cellulose degradation. Whereas cello-oligosaccharides arise from cellulose depolymerization by glycoside hydrolases, oxidized cello-oligosaccharides are produced by cellobiose dehydrogenase and the recently identified copper dependent lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) currently classified as CBM33 and GH61. The latter enzymes are wide-spread and expected to play crucial roles in further development of efficient enzyme technology for biomass conversion. Three HPLC approaches with well documented performance in the field of oligosaccharide analysis have been investigated: high-performance anion-exchange chromatography (HPAEC), hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) and porous graphitized carbon liquid chromatography (PGC-LC). HPAEC with pulsed amperometric detection (PAD) was superior for analysis of oxidized oligosaccharides, combining the best separation with superior sensitivity for oligosaccharide species with a degree of polymerization (DP) ranging from 1 to 10. Furthermore, the HPAEC method can be optimized for operation in a high-throughput manner (run time 10 min). Both PGC-LC and HILIC allow reasonable run times (41 and 25 min, respectively), with acceptable separation, but suffer from poor sensitivity compared to HPAEC-PAD. On the other hand, PGC-LC and HILIC benefit from being fully compatible with online mass spectrometry. Using an LC-MS setup, these methods will deliver much better sensitivity than what can be obtained with conventional detectors such as ultraviolet-, charged aerosol-, or evaporative light scattering and may reach sensitivities similar to or even better than what is obtained in HPAEC-PAD. Pure oxidized cello-oligosaccharide standards, ranging from DP2 to DP5, were obtained by semi-preparative PGC and characterized by MS and NMR analysis.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23246088     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.11.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  53 in total

1.  Structural and Functional Characterization of a Lytic Polysaccharide Monooxygenase with Broad Substrate Specificity.

Authors:  Anna S Borisova; Trine Isaksen; Maria Dimarogona; Abhishek A Kognole; Geir Mathiesen; Anikó Várnai; Åsmund K Røhr; Christina M Payne; Morten Sørlie; Mats Sandgren; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The carbohydrate-binding module and linker of a modular lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase promote localized cellulose oxidation.

Authors:  Gaston Courtade; Zarah Forsberg; Ellinor B Heggset; Vincent G H Eijsink; Finn L Aachmann
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Kinetics of H2O2-driven degradation of chitin by a bacterial lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase.

Authors:  Silja Kuusk; Bastien Bissaro; Piret Kuusk; Zarah Forsberg; Vincent G H Eijsink; Morten Sørlie; Priit Väljamäe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Oxidative cleavage of polysaccharides by monocopper enzymes depends on H2O2.

Authors:  Bastien Bissaro; Åsmund K Røhr; Gerdt Müller; Piotr Chylenski; Morten Skaugen; Zarah Forsberg; Svein J Horn; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 15.040

5.  Recent Liquid Chromatographic Approaches and Developments for the Separation and Purification of Carbohydrates.

Authors:  Gabe Nagy; Tianyuan Peng; Nicola L B Pohl
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.896

6.  Structural determinants of bacterial lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase functionality.

Authors:  Zarah Forsberg; Bastien Bissaro; Jonathan Gullesen; Bjørn Dalhus; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Methylation of the N-terminal histidine protects a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase from auto-oxidative inactivation.

Authors:  Dejan M Petrović; Bastien Bissaro; Piotr Chylenski; Morten Skaugen; Morten Sørlie; Marianne S Jensen; Finn L Aachmann; Gaston Courtade; Anikó Várnai; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  High-resolution structure of a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase from Hypocrea jecorina reveals a predicted linker as an integral part of the catalytic domain.

Authors:  Henrik Hansson; Saeid Karkehabadi; Nils Mikkelsen; Nicholai R Douglas; Steve Kim; Anna Lam; Thijs Kaper; Brad Kelemen; Katlyn K Meier; Stephen M Jones; Edward I Solomon; Mats Sandgren
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Crystal structure and computational characterization of the lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase GH61D from the Basidiomycota fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium.

Authors:  Miao Wu; Gregg T Beckham; Anna M Larsson; Takuya Ishida; Seonah Kim; Christina M Payne; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley; Svein J Horn; Bjørge Westereng; Kiyohiko Igarashi; Masahiro Samejima; Jerry Ståhlberg; Vincent G H Eijsink; Mats Sandgren
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Oxygen Activation by Cu LPMOs in Recalcitrant Carbohydrate Polysaccharide Conversion to Monomer Sugars.

Authors:  Katlyn K Meier; Stephen M Jones; Thijs Kaper; Henrik Hansson; Martijn J Koetsier; Saeid Karkehabadi; Edward I Solomon; Mats Sandgren; Bradley Kelemen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.