Literature DB >> 23240777

The amphetamine response moderates the relationship between negative emotionality and alcohol use.

Kenneth J D Allen1, Frances H Gabbay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Considerable evidence suggests that sensitivity to the stimulant effects of alcohol and other drugs is a risk marker for heavy or problematic use of those substances. A separate body of research implicates negative emotionality. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the independent and interactive effects of the stimulant response, assessed with an amphetamine challenge, and negative emotionality on alcohol and drug use.
METHODS: Healthy young women and men completed the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) and an inventory assessing alcohol and other drug use. Subsequently, the effects of 10-mg d-amphetamine were determined in the laboratory using the Stimulant scale of the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale. Hierarchical regression analyses evaluated the effects of amphetamine response and the MPQ factor Negative Emotionality on measures of substance use.
RESULTS: The amphetamine response moderated relationships between negative emotionality and alcohol use: in combination with a robust amphetamine response (i.e., enhanced stimulant effects as compared with baseline), negative emotionality predicted greater alcohol consumption, more episodes of binge drinking, and more frequent intoxication in regression models. A strong stimulant response independently predicted having used an illicit drug, and there was a trend for it to predict having used alcohol. Negative emotionality alone was not associated with any measure of alcohol or drug use.
CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the idea that emotion-based behavioral dysregulation promotes reward seeking, a high level of negative emotionality was associated with maladaptive alcohol use when it co-occurred with sensitivity to drug-based reward. The findings contribute to our understanding of how differences in personality may interact with those in drug response to affect alcohol use.
Copyright © 2012 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23240777      PMCID: PMC3563713          DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01935.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  95 in total

1.  The relation of personality to alcohol abuse/dependence in a high-risk sample.

Authors:  A Loukas; J L Krull; L Chassin; A C Carle
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2000-12

2.  Personality factors moderate subjective and psychophysiological responses to d-amphetamine in humans.

Authors:  K E Hutchison; M D Wood; R Swift
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Subjective and objective responses to ethanol in moderate/heavy and light social drinkers.

Authors:  L Holdstock; A C King; H de Wit
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Different sensitivity to the motor-stimulating effect of amphetamine in Sardinian alcohol-preferring and non-preferring rats.

Authors:  Paolo S D'Aquila; Alessandra T Peana; Olga Tanda; Gino Serra
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2002-01-18       Impact factor: 4.432

5.  Biphasic alcohol response differs in heavy versus light drinkers.

Authors:  Andrea C King; Tim Houle; Harriet de Wit; Louis Holdstock; Alyson Schuster
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Individual differences in responses to ethanol and d-amphetamine: a within-subject study.

Authors:  L Holdstock; H de Wit
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Effects of amphetamine on locomotor activity in adult and juvenile alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring rats.

Authors:  D L McKinzie; W J McBride; J M Murphy; L Lumeng; T-K Li
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Alcohol stimulates motor activity in selectively bred Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP), but not in Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP), rats.

Authors:  R Agabio; M A Carai; C Lobina; M Pani; R Reali; G Vacca; G L Gessa; G Colombo
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.405

9.  Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine.

Authors:  Rick A Bevins; Jessica L Peterson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Self-reported subjective perception of intoxication reflects family history of alcoholism when breath alcohol levels are constant.

Authors:  Sandra L Morzorati; V A Ramchandani; L Flury; T-K Li; S O'Connor
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  4 in total

1.  Social cognitive mediators of the relationship between impulsivity traits and adolescent alcohol use: Identifying unique targets for prevention.

Authors:  Kiri A Patton; Matthew J Gullo; Jason P Connor; Gary C K Chan; Adrian B Kelly; Richard F Catalano; John W Toumbourou
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Simultaneous co-ingestion of prescription stimulants, alcohol and other drugs: a multi-cohort national study of US adolescents.

Authors:  Sean Esteban McCabe; Brady T West; Ty S Schepis; Christian J Teter
Journal:  Hum Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 1.672

3.  Concurrent use of amphetamine stimulants and antidepressants by undergraduate students.

Authors:  Kim Vo; Patricia J Neafsey; Carolyn A Lin
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 4.  The role of rumination in illness trajectories in youth: linking trans-diagnostic processes with clinical staging models.

Authors:  A B Grierson; I B Hickie; S L Naismith; J Scott
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 7.723

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.