Literature DB >> 15388285

Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine.

Rick A Bevins1, Jessica L Peterson.   

Abstract

Rat's reactivity to inescapable novelty can predict the subsequent psychomotor effects of many stimulants. This relation has not been examined for methamphetamine. Experiment 1 assessed the locomotor effects of methamphetamine (0.0625-1.0 mg/kg). On average, acute administration of methamphetamine (0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg) had a stimulant effect on activity; locomotor sensitization was seen after repeated administration of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg. In a subsequent drug-free test, rats that had the locomotor chamber paired with 0.25, 0.5, or 1 mg/kg methamphetamine on eight separate occasions were more active than controls--conditioned hyperactivity. Experiment 2 used the 0.5-mg/kg dose to examine whether forced novelty exposure (novelty-induced activity) or free-choice novelty (approach to novel environment or object interaction) was predictive of methamphetamine's psychomotor effects. Only reactivity to inescapable novelty was systematically correlated with methamphetamine-induced activity. Rats more reactive to novelty [high responders (HR)] were more active to the acute and chronic methamphetamine challenge. Furthermore, these HR showed more conditioned hyperactivity than low responders (LR). Although acute methamphetamine did not have a stimulant effect in LR, only the LR displayed locomotor sensitization after chronic methamphetamine. This research extends the predictive variable of reactivity to inescapable novelty to methamphetamine's conditioned and unconditioned locomotor effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15388285     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  22 in total

1.  Chronic psychostimulant exposure to adult, but not periadolescent rats reduces subsequent morphine antinociception.

Authors:  Michelle C Cyr; Susan L Ingram; Sue A Aicher; Michael M Morgan
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Chronic variable stress and intravenous methamphetamine self-administration - Role of individual differences in behavioral and physiological reactivity to novelty.

Authors:  S B Taylor; L R Watterson; P R Kufahl; N E Nemirovsky; S E Tomek; C D Conrad; M F Olive
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 3.  Individual differences and social influences on the neurobehavioral pharmacology of abused drugs.

Authors:  M T Bardo; J L Neisewander; T H Kelly
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 25.468

4.  Pavlovian drug discrimination with bupropion as a feature positive occasion setter: substitution by methamphetamine and nicotine, but not cocaine.

Authors:  Jamie L Wilkinson; Chia Li; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  A comparison of amphetamine- and methamphetamine-induced locomotor activity in rats: evidence for qualitative differences in behavior.

Authors:  Darien A Hall; Jessica J Stanis; Hector Marquez Avila; Joshua M Gulley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Differential effects of methamphetamine and cocaine on conditioned place preference and locomotor activity in adult and adolescent male rats.

Authors:  Elena Zakharova; Giorgia Leoni; Ilona Kichko; Sari Izenwasser
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The multifaceted effects of oral administration of methylphenidate in juvenile rats: anxiety, activity, and attention.

Authors:  Ning Zhu; Jeremy Weedon; Diana L Dow-Edwards
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 4.600

8.  The amphetamine response moderates the relationship between negative emotionality and alcohol use.

Authors:  Kenneth J D Allen; Frances H Gabbay
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  The contribution of the central nucleus of the amygdala to individual differences in amphetamine-induced hyperactivity.

Authors:  Mary E Cain; Rosemary A Coolon; Margaret J Gill
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  To breed or not to breed? Empirical evaluation of drug effects in adolescent rats.

Authors:  Jenny L Wiley; Rhys L Evans
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 2.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.