Literature DB >> 12068251

Biphasic alcohol response differs in heavy versus light drinkers.

Andrea C King1, Tim Houle, Harriet de Wit, Louis Holdstock, Alyson Schuster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most studies of risk factors for alcohol-related problems have focused on biological family history as a primary risk factor. However, other factors, such as early-age heavy drinking, are also risk factors for sustained or progressive heavy consumption. Little is currently known about the mechanisms underlying binge or heavy drinking.
METHODS: This study examined the acute subjective and objective effects of ethanol in heavy drinkers versus light drinkers. Thirty-four subjects participated in this within-subjects study consisting of three early-evening testing sessions in which subjects consumed a beverage containing either 0.8 or 0.4 g/kg ethanol or placebo.
RESULTS: Compared with lighter drinkers, heavy drinkers were more sensitive to the positive stimulant-like effects of ethanol (p < 0.05), especially during the increasing limb of the blood alcohol curve. Heavy drinkers also showed less sedation and cortisol response after alcohol than the light drinkers (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that young adult binge drinkers show a biphasic alcohol response, with heightened sensitivity to stimulant-like alcohol effects and greater tolerance to sedative alcohol effects compared with their light-drinking counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12068251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  122 in total

1.  Subjective perceptions associated with the ascending and descending slopes of breath alcohol exposure vary with recent drinking history.

Authors:  Leah Wetherill; Sandra L Morzorati; Tatiana Foroud; Kyle Windisch; Todd Darlington; Ulrich S Zimmerman; Martin H Plawecki; Sean J O'Connor
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Subjective and neural responses to intravenous alcohol in young adults with light and heavy drinking patterns.

Authors:  Jodi M Gilman; Vijay A Ramchandani; Tess Crouss; Daniel W Hommer
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Idiographically determined versus standard absorption periods in alcohol administration studies.

Authors:  Rebecca L Schacht; Susan A Stoner; William H George; Jeanette Norris
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Responses to alcohol and cigarette use during ecologically assessed drinking episodes.

Authors:  Thomas M Piasecki; Phillip K Wood; Saul Shiffman; Kenneth J Sher; Andrew C Heath
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  The genetic relationships between ethanol preference, acute ethanol sensitivity, and ethanol tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Anita V Devineni; Kimberly D McClure; Douglas J Guarnieri; Ammon B Corl; Fred W Wolf; Mark Eddison; Ulrike Heberlein
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.160

6.  Does Self-Reported or Behavioral Impulsivity Predict Subjective Response to Low-Dose Alcohol?

Authors:  Benjamin L Berey; Robert F Leeman; Brian Pittman; Nicholas Franco; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.826

7.  Dutasteride reduces alcohol's sedative effects in men in a human laboratory setting and reduces drinking in the natural environment.

Authors:  Jonathan Covault; Timothy Pond; Richard Feinn; Albert J Arias; Cheryl Oncken; Henry R Kranzler
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Alcohol attenuates amygdala-frontal connectivity during processing social signals in heavy social drinkers: a preliminary pharmaco-fMRI study.

Authors:  Stephanie M Gorka; Daniel A Fitzgerald; Andrea C King; K Luan Phan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Behavioral genetic contributions to the study of addiction-related amphetamine effects.

Authors:  Tamara J Phillips; Helen M Kamens; Jeanna M Wheeler
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  The amphetamine response moderates the relationship between negative emotionality and alcohol use.

Authors:  Kenneth J D Allen; Frances H Gabbay
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.